RISK COMMUNICATION AS A MECHANISM FOR TERRITORIAL COMMUNITY SECURITY STATUS FORMATION IN THE PROCESS OF ADAPTATION
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents the rationale for original content of one of important notions of sociology of risk and safety — risk communication. Several scholars treat risk communication as traditional model of information transfer. It is shown that programs of risk communication in foreign practice are based on methodology of information promotion for the benefits of risk producers and evaluations of risk of communication managers. The main postulate is to recognize the indisputable trustworthiness of the information provided to consumers. The author substantiates the methodological productivity of sociological conception of communication and responsibility, where the main postulate is not to provide information, necessary for producers of risk, but to create a common space of representations, estimations of risk and general attitudes, and eventually the space of admissibility of risk and security status.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Мегрелидзе К.Р. Основные проблемы социологии мышления. Тбилиси: Мецниереба, 1975.
Kasperson R.E., Palmlund I. Evaluating Risk Communication. In: V. Covello, D. McCallum, M. Pavlova (Eds.). Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations. Springer, Boston, MA, 1989. Pp.143–158.
Renn O. Risk Communication: Towards a Rational Discourse with the Public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1992, 29(3), 465–519.
Renn О. Risk Communication: Insight and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs of Health and Environmental Hazards. In: R.L. Heath, H. Don O’Hair (Eds.). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication. Routledge, Talor & Francis, 2015. Pp. 81–99.
REFERENCES
Megrelidze, K.R. (1975). Osnovnye problemy sociologii myshlenija (Main problems of the sociology of thinking). Tbilisi: Mecniereba.
Kasperson, R.E., Palmlund, I. (1989). Evaluating Risk Communication. In: V. Covello, D. McCallum, M. Pavlova (Eds.). Effective Risk Communication. The Role and Responsibility of Government and Nongovernment Organizations (pp. 143–158). Springer, Boston, MA.
Renn, O. (1992). Risk Communication: Towards a Rational Discourse with the Public. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 29(3), 465–519.
Renn, О. (2015). Risk Communication: Insight and Requirements for Designing Successful Communication Programs of Health and Environmental Hazards. In: R.L. Heath, H. Don O’Hair (Eds.). Handbook of Risk and Crisis Communication (pp. 81–99). Routledge, Talor & Francis.