Keywords
leaf morphometry
computer vision
OpenCV
developmental stability
bioindication
Siberian elm
How to Cite
Abstract
Developmental stability is a sensitive indicator of environmental quality, and fluctuating asymmetry of bilateral morphological traits offers a straightforward means of its assessment. In plants, leaf blades are convenient structures for such analyses, yet traditional manual morphometry is laborious, subjective, and prone to interoperator variability. This study presents a fully automated computer vision pipeline to measure key morphological features of Siberian elm leaves (Ulmus pumila L.) from scanned herbarium specimens. The workflow comprises a custom calibration template, contour detection, morphological filtering, row-wise sorting, and automated petiole removal. Algorithms are provided for the determination of leaf area, length, width, and, critically, for fluctuating asymmetry studies, the width of the left and right leaf halves. Validation against two conventional methods, pallet counting and a geometric formula, on a set of ten leaves demonstrates that digital area measurements are consistently more precise, avoiding the systematic overestimation inherent in manual partial-square counting and the rigidity of a fixed shape correction factor. The entire pipeline is implemented in Python with OpenCV and delivers metric-scaled results in tabular form, drastically reducing operator effort while ensuring full reproducibility. The proposed approach is suitable for large-scale environmental monitoring and can be embedded in a user-friendly software application.
References
Alves Silva E, Santos JC, Cornelissen TG (2018). How many leaves are enough? The influence of sample size on estimates of plant developmental instability and leaf asymmetry. Ecological Indicators 89: 912–924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.12.060
Backhaus A, Kuwabara A, Bauch M, Monk N, Sanguinetti G, Fleming A (2010). LEAFPROCESSOR: a new leaf phenotyping tool using contour bending energy and shape cluster analysis. New Phytologist 187(1): 251–261. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03266.x
Biot E, Cortizo M, Burguet J, Kiss A, Oughou MS, Maugarny A, Gonçalves B, Adroher B, Andrey Ph, Boudaoud A, Laufs P (2016). Multiscale quantification of morphodynamics: MorphoLeaf, software for 2 D shape analysis. Development 143: 3417-3428. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.134619
Cândea-Crăciun V-C, Rujescu C, Camen D, Manea D, Nicolin AL, Sala F (2018) Non-destructive method for determining the leaf area of the energetic poplar. AgroLife Scientific Journal 7(2): 22–30.
Cornelissen T, Stiling P (2010). small variations over large scales: fluctuating asymmetry over the range of two oak species. International Journal of Plant Sciences 171(3): 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1086/650202
Erofeeva EA, Yakimov BN (2020). Change of leaf trait asymmetry type in Tilia cordata Mill. and Betula pendula Roth under air pollution. Symmetry 12(5): 727. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12050727
FAST: Domestic software for image measurements. Available at: https://ssbg.asu.ru/fast-po-dlya-zamerov/ (in Russian).
Freeman DC, Graham JH, Tracy M, Emlen JM, Alados CL (1999). Developmental instability as a means of assessing stress in plants: a case study using electromagnetic fields and soybeans. International Journal of Plant Sciences 160(S6): 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1086/314213
Graham JH, Whitesell MJ, Fleming IIM, Hel Or H, Nevo E, Raz S (2015). Fluctuating asymmetry of plant leaves: batch processing with LAMINA and continuous symmetry measures. Symmetry 7(1): 255–268. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym7010255
ImageJ – Open-source software for processing and analyzing scientific images. Available at: https://imagej.net/
Korotchenko IS (2015) Bioindication of pollution in Krasnoyarsk districts by fluctuating asymmetry of the leaf blade of the Siberian elm. Vestnik KrasGAU 11(110): 67–72 (in Russian).
Liao F, Peng J, Chen R (2017). LeafletAnalyzer, an automated software for quantifying, comparing and classifying blade and serration features of compound leaves during development, and among induced mutants and natural variants in the legume Medicago truncatula. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 915. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00915
Moiseichenko VF, Zaveryukha AH, Trifonova MF (1994) Fundamentals of scientific research in fruit growing, vegetable growing and viticulture. Moscow: Kolos, 383 p. (in Russian).
Moller AP (1999). Elm, Ulmus glabra, leaf asymmetry and Dutch elm disease. Oikos 85(1): 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/3546796
Morphological Transformations. Available at: https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d9/d61/tutorial_py_morphological_ops.html
OpenCV Tutorials. Available at: https://docs.opencv.org/4.x/d9/df8/tutorial_root.html
Otto D, Munz S, Memic E, Hartung J, Graeff-Hönninger S (2025) A computer vision approach for quantifying leaf shape of maize (Zea mays L.) and simulating its impact on light interception. Frontiers in Plant Science 16: 1521242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1521242
Park GE, Lee DK, Kim KW, Batkhuu N-O, Tsogtbaatar J, Zhu J-J, Jin Y, Park PS, Hyun JO, Kim HS. (2016). Morphological characteristics and water use efficiency of Siberian elm trees (Ulmus pumila L.) within arid regions of Northeast Asia. Forests 7(11): 280. https://doi.org/10.3390/f7110280
Park GE, Kim KW, Lee DK, Hyun JO (2013). Adaptive phenotypic plasticity of Siberian elm in response to drought stress: increased stomatal pore depth. Microscopy and Microanalysis 19(S5): 178–181. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1431927613012610
Sá Junior JJ de M, Rossatto DR, Kolb RM, Bruno OM (2013). A computer vision approach to quantify leaf anatomical plasticity: a case study on Gochnatia polymorpha (Less.) Cabrera. Ecological Informatics 15: 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2013.02.007
Sandner TM, Matthies D (2017). Fluctuating asymmetry of leaves is a poor indicator of environmental stress and genetic stress by inbreeding in Silene vulgaris. Ecological Indicators 79:247–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.030
Sandner TM, Zverev V, Kozlov MV (2019). Can the use of landmarks improve the suitability of fluctuating asymmetry in plant leaves as an indicator of stress? Ecological Indicators 97: 457–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.10.038
Shi P, Zheng X, Ratkowsky DA, Li Y, Wang P, Cheng L (2018). A simple method for measuring the bilateral symmetry of leaves. Symmetry 10(4): 118. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10040118
Suarez E, Blaser M, Sutton M (2015) Automating leaf area measurement in citrus: The development and validation of a Python-based tool. Applied Sciences 15(17): 9750. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15179750
Vaganov AV, Krotova OS., Khvorova LA (2021) Processing and analysis of botanical micro- and macroobjects using computer vision technologies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2142: 012003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2142/1/012003
Viscosi V (2015). Geometric morphometrics and leaf phenotypic plasticity: assessing fluctuating asymmetry and allometry in European white oaks (Quercus). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 179(2): 335–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12323
Watchareeruetai U, Ditthawibun M, Phanjan K. (2015). Detection of leaf apex and base by using contour and symmetry analysis. 2015 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/icsec.2015.7401441
Weight C, Parnham D, Waites R (2007). Technical advance: LeafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large scale analyses of leaf shape variation. The Plant Journal 53(3): 578–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313x.2007.03330.x
Zakharov VM (2003) Methodological recommendations for environmental quality assessment based on the state of living organisms (developmental stability assessment by the level of fluctuating asymmetry of morphological structures). Moscow: Center for Russian Environmental Policy, 68 p. (in Russian).
Zakharov VM, Klark DM (1993) Biotest: integral assessment of ecosystem and individual species health. Moscow: Moscow Branch of the International Foundation ‘Biotest’, 68 p. (in Russian).
Zverev V, Lama AD, Kozlov MV (2018). The fluctuating asymmetry of the birch leaves did not increase with pollution and drought stress in a controlled experiment. Ecological Indicators 84: 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.08.058
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.