TRUST AS A FORM OF SUPPORT FOR SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 8, 2019
Keywords:
trust, interpersonal trust, institutional trust, confidence index, social institutions
Main Article Content
Tatiana A. Guzhavina
Email: tanja_gta@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0636-7690
Abstract
Trust is a basis of social relations, is a constant object of research attention. It is influenced by many different factors of endogenous and exogenous nature. The focus of the article is trust, revealed as the respondents' attitude to others (interpersonal trust) and attitude to social institutions (institutional). Against the backdrop of a trend of declining confidence recorded by many large research companies (FOM), the analysis of the reasons that help trust is important. It is important to understand what factors and mechanisms form trust, and how it affects social institutions. The paper presents the results of a study obtained by specialists of the VolNС RAS. Interpretation of trust is carried out on the basis of existing theoretical and methodological approaches. An indicator method was used for the analysis and grouping data. The novelty of the work is the use of an integral index. The integral index of trust was calculated on the base of particular indices of interpersonal trust and institutional trust. Both indices are complex and calculated for each respondent. The study revealed the influence of factors of a socializing and institutional nature on trust. It is established that the level of trust influences the attitude to existing political institutions. The purpose of this article is to show by means of empirical material the distribution of trust between groups of respondents identified on the basis of the calculated confidence index, the relationship of interpersonal and institutional trust, as well as the influence of macro and micro level factors on its formation.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Guzhavina, T. A. (2019). TRUST AS A FORM OF SUPPORT FOR SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS. Society and Security Insights, 2(4), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)4-03
Section
STATE, CIVIL SOCIETY AND STABILITY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Алексеева А. Уверенность, обобщенное доверие и межличностное доверие: критерии различения. Социальная реальность, 2008, No. 7, 85–98.
Антоненко И.В. Интегративный потенциал доверия: метаотношения и функции. Вестник Университета (Государственный университет управления), 2012, No. 1, 104–108.
Гидденс Э. Последствия современности. М.: Праксис, 2011.
Глушко И.В. Социальное доверие в контексте межличностных отношений. Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль, 2014, No. 2, 213–216.
Гудков Л. Доверие в России: смысл, функции, структура. НЛО, 2012, No. 117. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/117/g25.html ).
Гужавина Т.А. Социальное доверие в гражданском обществе. Проблемы развития территории, 2012, No. 6, 115–122.
Давыденко В.А., Ромашкин Г.С. Системное доверие как фундаментальное условие функционирования и развития общества. Научный потенциал регионов на службу модернизации. Астрахань: АТСИ, 2011.
Заболотная Г.М. Феномен доверия и его социальные функции. Вестник РУДН. Сер. Социология, 2003, No. 1, 67–73.
Ильин Е.П. Психология доверия. СПб.: Питер, 2013.
Кертман Г. Межличностное доверие в России. Социальная реальность, 2006, No. 4, 7–24.
Купрейченко А.Б. Психология доверия и недоверия. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2008.
Кученкова А.В. Межличностное доверие в российском обществе. Социс, 2016, No. 1 26–36.
Лапин Н.И. Проблема формирования современного социального порядка в России. Вопросы философии, 2006, No. 11, 3–13.
Селигмен А. Проблема доверия. М.: Идея-пресс, 2002. 200с.
Татарко А.Н. Межличностное доверие как фактор социально-экономического развития. Социальная психология и общество, 2014, No. 3, 28–41.
Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. М.: АСТ, 2004.
Шабунова А.А., Гужавина, Т.А., Кожина, Т.П. Доверие и общественное развитие в России. Проблемы развития территории, 2015, No. 2, 7–19.
Штомпка П. Доверие — основа общества. М.: Логос, 2012.
Arrow K.J. The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton, 1974.
Coleman J. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Dasgupta P. Trust as a Commodity // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / Diego Gambetta Ed. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. 1988.
Diamond L. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1999.
Dryzek J., Stephen T. Leonard Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
Luhman N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (electronic edition). Ed. by D. Gambetta. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2000.
Orren K., Skowronek S. Order and Time in Institutional Study: A Brief for the Historical Approach. In: Political Science in History / James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
Stark D. Not by Design: The Myth of Designer Capitalism in Eastern Europe. In: Strategic Choice and Path-Dependency in Post-Socialism / J. Housner, B. Jassop, and K. Nelsen Eds. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar. 1995.
REFERENCES
Alekseeva, A. (2008). Uverennost', obobshchennoe doverie i mezhlichnostnoe doverie: kriterii razlicheniya [Confidence, generalized trust and interpersonal trust: criteria of distinction]. Social'naya real'nost', no 7, 85–98.
Antonenko, I. V. (2012). Integrativnyj potencial doveriya: metaotnosheniya i funkcii [Integrative potential of trust: meta-relations and functions]. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravleniya, no 1, 104–108.
Giddens, A. (2011). Posledstviya sovremennosti [Consequences of modernity]. Moscow: Praksis.
Glushko, I. V. (2014). Social'noe doverie v kontekste mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenij [Social trust in the context of interpersonal relations]. Istoricheskaya i social'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl', vol. 4, no 2, 213–216.
Gudkov, L. (2012). Doverie v Rossii: smysl, funkcii, struktura NLO, no 117. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/117/g25.html .
Guzhavina, T. A. (2012). Social'noe doverie v grazhdanskom obshchestve [Social trust in civil society]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, vol. 62, no 6, 115–122.
Davydenko, V. A., Romashkin, G. S. (2011). Sistemnoe doverie kak fundamental'noe uslovie funkcionirovaniya i razvitiya obshchestva [System trust as fundamental condition for functionnung and development of society]. Nauchnyj potencial regionov na sluzhbu modernizacii. Astrahan', 166–172.
Zabolotnaya, G. M. (2003). Fenomen doveriya i ego social'nye funkcii [Phenomenon of trust and its social functions]. Vestnik RUDN, Sociology Series, vol. 4, no 1, 67–73.
Lapin, N. I. (2006). Problema formirovaniya sovremennogo social'nogo poryadka v Rossii [Issue of formation of contemporary social order in Russia]. Voprosy filosofii., no 11, 3–13.
Il'in, E. P. (2013). Psihologiya doveriya [Psychology of trust]. SPb.: Piter.
Kertman, G. (2006). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v Rossii [Interpersonal trust]. Social'naya real'nost', no 4, 7— 24.
Kuprejchenko, A. B. (2008). Psihologiya doveriya i nedoveriya [Psychology of trust and distrust]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS.
Kuchenkova, A. V. (2016). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v rossijskom obshchestve [Interpersonal trust in the Russian society]. Sociological studies, no 1, 26–36.
Seligmen, A. (2002). Problema doveriya [Issue of trust]. M.: Ideya-press.
Tatarko, A. N. (2014). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie kak faktor social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Interpersonal trust as a factor of social-economic development]. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo, no 3, 28 — 41.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Moscow: AST; Ermak.
Shabunova, A. A., Guzhavina, T. A., Kozhina, T. P. (2015). Doverie i obshchestvennoe razvitie v Rossii [Trust and social development in Russia]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, no 2, 7–19.
Shtompka, P. (2012). Doverie — osnova obshchestva [Trust – a basis of society]. Moscow. Logos.
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a Commodity. In: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dryzek, J., Leonard, S. T. (1995). History and discipline in Political Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luhman, N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1995). Order and time in institutional study: A brief for the historical approach. Political science in history, 296-317.
Shepsle, K. (1995). Studying institutions: some lessons from the rational choice theory. Political science in history: research programs and political traditions, 276-295.
Stark, D. (1995). Not by Design: The Myth of Designer Capitalism in Eastern Europe In: Hausner J, Jessop B, Nielson K, editors. Strategic Choice and Path Dependence in Post-Socialism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Антоненко И.В. Интегративный потенциал доверия: метаотношения и функции. Вестник Университета (Государственный университет управления), 2012, No. 1, 104–108.
Гидденс Э. Последствия современности. М.: Праксис, 2011.
Глушко И.В. Социальное доверие в контексте межличностных отношений. Историческая и социально-образовательная мысль, 2014, No. 2, 213–216.
Гудков Л. Доверие в России: смысл, функции, структура. НЛО, 2012, No. 117. URL: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/117/g25.html ).
Гужавина Т.А. Социальное доверие в гражданском обществе. Проблемы развития территории, 2012, No. 6, 115–122.
Давыденко В.А., Ромашкин Г.С. Системное доверие как фундаментальное условие функционирования и развития общества. Научный потенциал регионов на службу модернизации. Астрахань: АТСИ, 2011.
Заболотная Г.М. Феномен доверия и его социальные функции. Вестник РУДН. Сер. Социология, 2003, No. 1, 67–73.
Ильин Е.П. Психология доверия. СПб.: Питер, 2013.
Кертман Г. Межличностное доверие в России. Социальная реальность, 2006, No. 4, 7–24.
Купрейченко А.Б. Психология доверия и недоверия. М.: Институт психологии РАН, 2008.
Кученкова А.В. Межличностное доверие в российском обществе. Социс, 2016, No. 1 26–36.
Лапин Н.И. Проблема формирования современного социального порядка в России. Вопросы философии, 2006, No. 11, 3–13.
Селигмен А. Проблема доверия. М.: Идея-пресс, 2002. 200с.
Татарко А.Н. Межличностное доверие как фактор социально-экономического развития. Социальная психология и общество, 2014, No. 3, 28–41.
Фукуяма Ф. Доверие: социальные добродетели и путь к процветанию. М.: АСТ, 2004.
Шабунова А.А., Гужавина, Т.А., Кожина, Т.П. Доверие и общественное развитие в России. Проблемы развития территории, 2015, No. 2, 7–19.
Штомпка П. Доверие — основа общества. М.: Логос, 2012.
Arrow K.J. The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton, 1974.
Coleman J. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Dasgupta P. Trust as a Commodity // Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations / Diego Gambetta Ed. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. 1988.
Diamond L. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1999.
Dryzek J., Stephen T. Leonard Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
Luhman N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (electronic edition). Ed. by D. Gambetta. Oxford: University of Oxford, 2000.
Orren K., Skowronek S. Order and Time in Institutional Study: A Brief for the Historical Approach. In: Political Science in History / James Farr, John S. Dryzek, and Stephen T. Leonard Eds. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1995.
Stark D. Not by Design: The Myth of Designer Capitalism in Eastern Europe. In: Strategic Choice and Path-Dependency in Post-Socialism / J. Housner, B. Jassop, and K. Nelsen Eds. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar. 1995.
REFERENCES
Alekseeva, A. (2008). Uverennost', obobshchennoe doverie i mezhlichnostnoe doverie: kriterii razlicheniya [Confidence, generalized trust and interpersonal trust: criteria of distinction]. Social'naya real'nost', no 7, 85–98.
Antonenko, I. V. (2012). Integrativnyj potencial doveriya: metaotnosheniya i funkcii [Integrative potential of trust: meta-relations and functions]. Vestnik Universiteta (Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravleniya, no 1, 104–108.
Giddens, A. (2011). Posledstviya sovremennosti [Consequences of modernity]. Moscow: Praksis.
Glushko, I. V. (2014). Social'noe doverie v kontekste mezhlichnostnyh otnoshenij [Social trust in the context of interpersonal relations]. Istoricheskaya i social'no-obrazovatel'naya mysl', vol. 4, no 2, 213–216.
Gudkov, L. (2012). Doverie v Rossii: smysl, funkcii, struktura NLO, no 117. Available at: http://magazines.russ.ru/nlo/2012/117/g25.html .
Guzhavina, T. A. (2012). Social'noe doverie v grazhdanskom obshchestve [Social trust in civil society]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, vol. 62, no 6, 115–122.
Davydenko, V. A., Romashkin, G. S. (2011). Sistemnoe doverie kak fundamental'noe uslovie funkcionirovaniya i razvitiya obshchestva [System trust as fundamental condition for functionnung and development of society]. Nauchnyj potencial regionov na sluzhbu modernizacii. Astrahan', 166–172.
Zabolotnaya, G. M. (2003). Fenomen doveriya i ego social'nye funkcii [Phenomenon of trust and its social functions]. Vestnik RUDN, Sociology Series, vol. 4, no 1, 67–73.
Lapin, N. I. (2006). Problema formirovaniya sovremennogo social'nogo poryadka v Rossii [Issue of formation of contemporary social order in Russia]. Voprosy filosofii., no 11, 3–13.
Il'in, E. P. (2013). Psihologiya doveriya [Psychology of trust]. SPb.: Piter.
Kertman, G. (2006). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v Rossii [Interpersonal trust]. Social'naya real'nost', no 4, 7— 24.
Kuprejchenko, A. B. (2008). Psihologiya doveriya i nedoveriya [Psychology of trust and distrust]. Moscow: Institute of Psychology of the RAS.
Kuchenkova, A. V. (2016). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie v rossijskom obshchestve [Interpersonal trust in the Russian society]. Sociological studies, no 1, 26–36.
Seligmen, A. (2002). Problema doveriya [Issue of trust]. M.: Ideya-press.
Tatarko, A. N. (2014). Mezhlichnostnoe doverie kak faktor social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya [Interpersonal trust as a factor of social-economic development]. Social'naya psihologiya i obshchestvo, no 3, 28 — 41.
Fukuyama, F. (2004). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Moscow: AST; Ermak.
Shabunova, A. A., Guzhavina, T. A., Kozhina, T. P. (2015). Doverie i obshchestvennoe razvitie v Rossii [Trust and social development in Russia]. Problemy razvitiya territorii, no 2, 7–19.
Shtompka, P. (2012). Doverie — osnova obshchestva [Trust – a basis of society]. Moscow. Logos.
Arrow, K. J. (1974). The Limits of Organization. New York: Norton.
Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a Commodity. In: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 49–72). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Dryzek, J., Leonard, S. T. (1995). History and discipline in Political Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Luhman, N. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Alternatives. In: D. Gambetta (Ed.) Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations (pp. 94–107). Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell.
Orren, K., & Skowronek, S. (1995). Order and time in institutional study: A brief for the historical approach. Political science in history, 296-317.
Shepsle, K. (1995). Studying institutions: some lessons from the rational choice theory. Political science in history: research programs and political traditions, 276-295.
Stark, D. (1995). Not by Design: The Myth of Designer Capitalism in Eastern Europe In: Hausner J, Jessop B, Nielson K, editors. Strategic Choice and Path Dependence in Post-Socialism. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.