BURIAL GROUND OF THE TASHTYK CULTURE TESINSKIY ZALIV‑3: ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONTEXT AND DENDROCHRONOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Abstract
The article presents the results of the study of the Tashtyk culture burial ground Tesinskiy Zaliv‑3. The site is located in the Republic of Khakassia in the left-bank part of the Sydo-Yerbinskaya Basin, on a small cape south of the mouth of the Tes’ River. It was discovered in 2012, and its field study has been conducted since 2017. At the time of discovery, the burial ground consisted of 81 objects. Excavations along the coastline revealed four ground graves, three of which contained log cabins, and three objects of ritual purpose. According to the features of the burial rite, three groups of graves are distinguished: cremation in a log cabin, burial in a pit, and a bi-ritual rite (burning and burial) in a log cabin. The range of objects found in burials is widely represented in the cemeteries of the Tashtyk culture: vessels on a tray, hairpins, beads of various types–glass and made of carnelian, which find close analogies with antique beads. Particular emphasis is placed on the study of wooden structures using the dendrochronology method for the purpose of relative dating of the graves. A series of 21 samples was selected from all burials with wood structures (graves 1, 2, 9). For each grave, a generalized tree-ring chronology (TRC) of varying length was constructed: grave 1 — larch, 95 years length; grave 2 — larch, 116 years; grave 9 — pine, 159 years. Cross-dating of the TRC of the three graves with each other and with the dendroscale of the Oglakhty burial ground made it possible to link all three graves with the relative Oglakhty chronology in a narrow interval: 178 (grave 1), 176 (grave 2) and 180 (grave 9) years on the relative scale. These dates are very close to the early group of graves of the Oglakhty necropolis. Radiocarbon dating makes it possible to estimate the time of construction of the burials at both sites: the second quarter of the 2nd — second quarter of the 4th centuries AD.
Downloads
References
Alekseeva E.M. Antique Beads of the Northern Black Sea Region. Moscow : Nauka, 1975. 94 p. (In Russ.)
Ben’kova V.E., Shveingruber V.Kh. Anatomy of Russian Woods. Bern : Khaupt, 2004. 456 p.
Vadetskaya E.B. Tashtyk Epoch in the Ancient History of Siberia. St. Petersburg : Peterburgskoe Vostokovedenie, 1999. 440 p. (In Russ.)
Valiulina S.I. Glass of the Volga Bulgaria. (based on the materials of the Bilyar settlement). Kazan : KGU, 2005. 280 p. (In Russ.)
Goldina E.V. Beads of the Burial Grounds of the Nevolinskaya Culture (late 4th‑10thcenturies). Izhevsk : Izhevskaya respublikanskaya tipografiya, 2010. 264 p. (In Russ.)
Gubenko E.V. Finds of Beads in the Burials of the Tashtyk Burial Ground Tesinsky Zaliv‑3. In: Materials of the LIX RAESK. Blagoveshchensk : BGPU, 2019. Pp. 120–122. (In Russ.)
Lvova Z.A. Technique of Manufacturing North Caucasian Beads of the Second Half of the 1st Millennium. In: V.B. Kovalevskaya. Computer Processing of Mass Archaeological Material from Early Medieval Sites of Eurasia. Moscow : b.i., 2000. Pp. 257–272. (In Russ.)
Mitko O.A. Tashtyk Flat-grave Cemeteries in the Mouth of the Tes River. In: Archaeological Sites of Southern Siberia and Central Asia. St. Petersburg : IIMK RAN, 2021. Pp. 110–113. (In Russ.)
Mitko O.A., Burashnikova K.S., Gubenko E.V. Experimental Traceological Research on
Drilling Solid Minerals. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History and Philology. 2024;23(3): Archaeology and Ethnography:22–33. (In Russ.)
Mitko O.A., Skobelev S.G., Shirin Yu.V., Zubkov V.S., Poselyanin A.I., Davydov R.V., Zhuravleva Е.А., Polovnikov I.S., Sobinov R.L. Tesinsky Zaliv‑3 Earthen Burial Ground of the Tashtyk Culture: Results of the Field Season 2018. In: Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories. Vol. XXIV. Novosibirsk : Izd-vo In-ta arheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2018. Pp. 285–289. (In Russ.)
Mitko O.A., Khudyakov Yu.S., Skobelev S.G., Poselyanin A.I., Polovnikov I.S. Beginning of Research at the Tashtyk Earthen Burial Ground of Tesinsky Zaliv‑3 (Bogradsky District, Republic of Khakassia). In: Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories. Vol. XXIII. Novosibirsk : Izd-vo In-ta arheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2017. Pp. 354–357. (In Russ.)
Ruslanova R.R. Beads of the Southern Urals Based on the Materials from the Necropolises of the 3rd‑8th Centuries. Ufa : Bashkirskaya Enciklopediуa, 2018. 376 p. (In Russ.)
Slyusarenko I.Yu., Garkusha Yu.N. Dendrochronology of Burial Grounds of the Tashtyk Culture in the Khakass-Minusinsk Depression: Towards Formulation of the Problem. In: Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories. Vol. XXIХ. Novosibirsk : Izd-vo In-ta arheologii i etnografii SO RAN, 2023а. Рp. 864–870. (In Russ.)
Slyusarenko I.Yu., Garkusha Yu.N. Dendrochronological Study of Wood from the Oglakhty Burial Ground of the Tashtyk Culture (Republic of Khakassia): First Results. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya = Siberian Historical Research. 2023b;3:204–235. (In Russ.)
Chernykh N.B. Dendrochronology and Archaeology. Moscow : Nox, 1996. 216 p. (In Russ.)
Grissino-Mayer H.D. Evaluating Crossdating Accuracy: A Manual and Tutorial for the Computer Program Cofecha. Tree-Ring Research. 2001;57(2):205–211.
Pankova S.V., Makarov N.P., Simpson St J., Cartwright C.R. New Radiocarbon Dates and Environmental Analyses of Finds from 1903 Excavations in the Eastern Plot of the Tashtyk Cemetery of Oglakhty. Sibirskie istoricheskie issledovaniya = Siberian Historical Research. 2021;3:24–59.
Rinn F. TSAP-Win: Time Series Analysis and Presentation for Dendrochronology and Related Applications. Version 4.64. User reference. Heidelberg, Germany : Frank Rinn Distribution, 2013. 100 p.
Copyright (c) 2025 Ю.Н. Гаркуша, О.А. Митько , И.Ю. Слюсаренко

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



2.jpg)






