MORPHOGENETIC RESPONSES OF WHEAT IMMATURE EMBRYO CULTURE DEPENDING ON GROWING CONDITIONS OF DONOR PLANTS
PDF

Keywords

spring wheat
immature embryo
donor plant
genotype
growing conditions
callus
morphogenesis
plant regeneration
variation.

How to Cite

Khlebova, L. P., & Nikitina, E. D. (2016). MORPHOGENETIC RESPONSES OF WHEAT IMMATURE EMBRYO CULTURE DEPENDING ON GROWING CONDITIONS OF DONOR PLANTS. Acta Biologica Sibirica, 2(2), 68-75. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v2i2.1348

Abstract

The article considers the influence of growth conditions of donor plants on in vitro morphogenetic responses of immature embryos from spring bread wheat. The materials were 12 varieties of different ecological and geographical origin from the collection of Altai Research Institute of Agriculture (Barnaul, Russia). Donor plants were grown in the greenhouse and experimental field near Barnaul. Immature embryos with 1.3–1.5 mm in size isolated from seeds collected 14–16 days post anthesis were used as explants. The embryos were placed with the sculletum upwards on a sterile solid agar (0,8%) medium containing the inorganic components of Linsmaier & Skoog (LS), 3% sucrose, 2.0 mg l-1 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and incubated in the darkness at 26±1°C. Induced calli were subcultured after 25–30 days interval in fresh medium supplemented with 0.5 mg l-1 2,4-D and 0.5 mg l-1 kinetin and grown at 25±1 °C under a 16/8-h (day/night) photoperiod with a white fluorescent light. Embryogenic calli were transferred to LS medium containing 0.2 mg l-1 indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) for regeneration. A complete randomized block design with four replications per a genotype (60 embryos) was used. We stated by analysis of the components of phenotypic variance that genetic factor has been the leading one in all stages of tissue culture, but the highest effect (80%) was on plant regeneration. Interaction of the factors considered was competitive with genotypic influence on the stages of morphogenesis (28%) and callusogenesis (27%). Influence of “conditions” was statistically significant, but inferior to other factors. The greatest result was obtained for induction of morphogenic calli. Field conditions were the most favorable for genotypes with high callus and regeneration abilities. Culture responses of those with a low regeneration potential increased after growing donor plants in greenhouse vegetation in 3.4 – 13.9 times. For most genotypes moderate temperature and precipitation as well as natural lighting before collecting material increased morphogenic competence of explants in wheat tissue culture. Possible reasons for the influence of growth conditions of explant donor plants on in vitro culture traits have been discussed. 

https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v2i2.1348
PDF

References

Atchison, J., Head, L., Gates, A. (2010). Wheat as food, wheat as industrial substance; comparative geographies of transformation and mobility. Geoforum, 41, 236–246.

Avksentyeva, O.A., Petrenko, V.A. (2009). Role of the genotype, composition of medium and type of explant in formation of the first callus of wheat isogenic lines. Visnik Harkivskogo nacionalnogo universitetu

imeni V.N. Karazina. Seriya. Biologiya, 9(856), 56–62 (in Russian).

Avksentyeva, O.A., Petrenko, V.A., Tichenko, A.A., Zhmurko, V.V. (2008). Callus initiation and morphogenesis in in vitro culture of isogenetic on gene type and rate of development in winter wheat lines. Annual Wheat Newsletter, 54, 150–152.

Benkırane, H., Sabounj, S., Chlyah, A., Chlyah, H. (2000). Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from fragments of immature inflorescences and coleoptiles of durum wheat. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture, 61, 107–113.

Bhalla, P.L. (2006). Genetic engineering of wheat – current challenges and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol, 24, 305–311.

Bychkova, O.V. (2016). Evaluation of morphogenesis and regeneration of hard spring wheat in vitro. Acta Biologica Sibirica, 2(1), 139–149 (in Russian).

Chauhan, H., Desai, S.A., Khurana, P. (2007). Comparative analysis of the differential regeneration response of various genotypes of Triticum aestivum, Triticum durum and Triticum dicoccum. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult, 91, 191–199.

Dodig, D., Zorić, M., Mitić, N., Nikolić, R., King, S.R., Lalević, B., Šurlan-Momirović, G. (2010). Morphogenetic responses of embryo culture of wheat related to environment culture conditions of the explant donor plant. Sci. Agric. (Piracicaba, Braz.), 67(3), 295–300.

Food and Agriculture Organization (2011). Global cereal supply and demand brief. Crop Prospects and Food Situation, 1, 4–5.

Grigorieva, L.P., Shletser, I.A. Screening wheat caltivars for morphogenesis ability in immature embryo culture in vitro. (2006). Izvestiya altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3, 64–66 (in Russian).

Han, X.F., Tao, L.L., Yin, G.X., Liu, X.L., Du, L.P., Wei, Y.Q., Yan, Y.M., Ye, X.G. (2010). Effect of genotype and growing environment on anther culture in wheat. Acata Agronomica Sinica, 36, 1209–1215.

Hess, J.R., Carman, J.G. (1998). Embryogenic competence of immature wheat embryos: genotype, donor plant environment and endogenous hormone levels. Crop Science, 38, 249–253.

Jones, H.D. (2005). Wheat transformation: current technology and applications to grain development and composition. J. Cereal Sci, 41, 137–147.

Kruglova, N.N., Katasonova, A.A.(2009). Immature wheat embryo as the morphogenetically competent explant. Fiziologiya i bioximiya kulturnyh rastenij, 41(2), 124–131 (in Russian).

Linsmaier, E., Skoog, F. (1965). Organic growth factor reqularments of tobacco tissue culture. Physiol. Plant, 18(1), 100–127.

Maddock, S.E., Lancaster, V.A., Risiott, R., Franklin, J. (1983). Plant regeneration from cultured immature embryos and inflorescences of 25 cultivars of wheat (T. aestivum). J. Exp. Bot, 34(144), 915–926.

Mamrutha, H.M., Kumar, R., Venkatesh, K., Sharma, P., Kumar, R., Tiwari, V., Sharma, I. (2014). Genetic transformation of wheat – Present status and future potential. Journal of Wheat Research, 6(2), 107–119.

Mitić N., Dodig, D., Nikolić R. (2006). Variability of in vitro culture response in wheat genotypes, genotype and environmental effects. Genetika, 38(3), 183–192.

Mokhtari, A., Alizadeh, H., Samadi, B.Ya., Omidi, M., Otroshy, M., Moeini, Z. (2013). Effect of plant growth regulators on direct shoot regeneration of wheat immature embryonic explants. Journal of Agricultural Engineering and Biotechnology, 1(3), 74–80.

Nasircilar, A.G., Turgut, K., Fiscin, K. (2006). Callus induction and plant regeneration from mature embryos of different wheat genotypes. Pak. J. Bot, 38(2), 637–645.

Nikitina, E.D., Khlebova, L.P., Sokolova, G.G. (2013a). The development of Ni-resistance sources of spring wheat by cell selection in vitro. Izvestiya altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3-1(79) , 88–90 (in Russian).

Nikitina, E.D., Khlebova, L.P., Sokolova, G.G., Ereschenko, O.V. (2013b). The development of stress-resistant stock of spring bread wheat by in vitro cell selection. Izvestiya altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3-2(79) , 95–98. (in Russian). DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2013)3.2-20.

Nikitina, E.D., Khlebova, L.P. (2014). The influence of temperature and light on direct sprouting of Triticum aestivum L. immature embryos in vitro. Izvestiya altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3-1(83) , 46–50 (in Russian).

Nikitina, E.D., Khlebova, L.P., Ereschenko, O.V. (2014). The development of some technology elements of the spring wheat cell selection for resistance to abiotic stresses. Izvestiya altajskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3-2(83), 50–54 (in Russian). DOI: 10.14258/izvasu(2014)3.2-09.

Nikitina, E.D., Khlebova, L.P., Pronina, R.D. (2015). In vitro somaclonal variation as initial material for bread wheat breeding. Acta Biologica Sibirica, 1(3-4), 171–186 (in Russian).

Patnaik, D., Khurana, P. (2001). Wheat biotechnology: A minireview. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, 4(2), 1–29.

Pellegrineschi, A., Brito, R.M., McLean, S., Hoisington, D. (2004). Effect of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and NaCl on the establishment of callus and plant regeneration in durum and bread wheat. Plant Cell, Tissue, Organ Culture, 77(3), 245–250.

Przetakiewicz, A., Orczyk, W., Nadolska-Orczyk A. (2003). The effect of auxin on plant regeneration of wheat, barley and Triticale. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 73(3), 245–256.

Salyaev, R.K., Dudareva, L.V., Lankevich, S.V., Sumtsova, V.M. (2001). The effect of low-intensity coherent radiation on the processes of morphogenesis in the wheat callus culture. Dokl. Akad. Nauk, 376, 830–832.

Vasil, I.K. (2007). Molecular genetic improvement of cereals: transgenic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Cell Rep, 26, 1133–1154.

Wang, X.M., Ren, X., Yin, G.X., Wang, K., Li, J.R., Du, L.P., Xu, H.J., Ye, X.G. (2013). Effects of environmental temperature on the regeneration frequency of the immature embryos of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Journal of Integrative Agriculture. Advanded Online Publication. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60361-5.

Wang, C., Wei, Z. (2004). Embriogenesis and regeneration of green plantlets from wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) leafbase. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 77(2), 149–153.

Zhang, W., Wang, X., Fan, R., Yin, G., Wang, K., Du, L., Xiao, L., Yt, X. (2014) Effects of inter-culture, arabinogalactan proteins, and hydrogen peroxide on the plant regeneration of wheat immature embryos. Journal of Integrative Agriculture. Advanded Online Publication. DOI: 10.1016/S2095-3119(14)60764-4.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.