List of fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russia)
Articles
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.15037355

List of fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russia)

Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny"
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0862-7601
Zoological Museum of Moscow University
Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny"
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2653-3879
Checklist collection nets Europe flies Malaise traps yellow pan traps

Abstract

The annotated checklist includes 309 species from the families Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, and Mycetophilidae. In addition to the previous records, 242 species have been recorded for the fauna of the Republic of Mordovia for the first time. Among these are species new to Russia (Orfelia boreoalpina, Mycetophila rudis, Neoclastobasis draskovitsae, Novakia scatopsiformis) and a species new to the Palearctic (Sciophila emarginata). The collection sites are described. For the first time, 242 species are recorded for the fauna of the Republic of Mordovia. Over the course of the study, 275 species were noted in the Mordovia Nature Reserve, 91 species in National Park "Smolny", and 47 species in other locations within the region. Data on trapping methods for the collected fungus gnats are provided. Comparative data on species abundance in neighboring regions are also discussed.

List of fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russia)

Mikhail N. Esin1, Dmitriy I. Gavryushin2, Alexander B. Ruchin1

1 Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny", Russia

2 Zoological Museum of Moscow University, Russia

Corresponding author: Alexaner B. Ruchin (ruchin.alexander@gmail.com)

Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 19 February 2025 | Accepted 7 March 2025 | Published 19 March 2025 |

http://zoobank.org/187FFE64-3BB4-453B-8825-33A685343BFC

Citation: Esin MN, Gavryushin DI, Ruchin AB (2025) List of fungus gnats (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russia). Acta Biologica Sibirica 11: 291–316. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15037355

Keywords

Checklist, collecting nets, Europe, flies, Malaise traps, yellow pan traps

Introduction

In recent years, the decline in insect biodiversity has drawn public attention and increased the demand for intensified studies of regional entomofauna (New and Samways 2014; Ronquist et al. 2020; D'Souza et al. 2021; Dvořák et al. 2023; Rosa et al. 2024). Consequently, comparative studies of insect fauna and populations have become increasingly relevant and necessary in light of growing concerns about insect biodiversity conservation (Montgomery et al. 2021; Köthe et al. 2023; Prosvirov et al. 2024).

Among insects, Diptera occupies one of the leading positions in terms of both biodiversity and abundance within regional faunas (Plotnikov et al. 2013; Hubenov 2019; Dvořák et al. 2020; Gornostaev et al. 2022). Research on this order in specific regions spans several decades and depends on various factors, such as the availability of specialists, the use of diverse methods, comprehensive surveys of different biotopes, and the exploration of undisturbed habitats. In the Republic of Mordovia, the study of Diptera fauna has been particularly active over the past decade. During this period, new species for science have been discovered (MacGowan and Ruchin 2022; Zeegers et al. 2023), and numerous species have been recorded for the first time in Russia's fauna (Chursina and Ruchin 2018; Astakhov et al. 2019; Dvořák et al. 2020; Grichanov 2021; MacGowan et al. 2021; Ruchin et al. 2021; Lutovinovas et al. 2022; Zeegers et al. 2024).

As a result of these studies, the Diptera fauna of the Republic of Mordovia currently includes 1187 species from 71 families (Esin et al. 2023). However, not all families have been studied to date.

The aim of this study is to investigate the biodiversity of several families of fungus gnats using a variety of methods, conduct a comparative analysis of these groups within protected areas, and evaluate different research methods employed in faunistic studies of fungus gnats.

Materials and methods

The Republic of Mordovia is situated in the central part of the East European (Russian) Plain, between 42°11' and 46°45'E and 53°38' and 55°11'N. It is approximately equidistant from the western, northern, and southern seas, with a maximum extent of 298 km from west to east and 140 km from north to south, covering an area of 26,121 km². The region features diverse landscapes, with most of its territory located in the forest-steppe zone of the Volga Upland, transitioning to the Oka-Don Lowland in the west (Yamashkin 2012).

The Mordovia State Nature Reserve is situated between 54°42'N and 54°56'N, and 43°03'E and 43°37'E, in the central part of the East European Plain, along the southern boundary of the mixed and broadleaf forest zones (Milkov 1977). The National Park "Smolny" is located in the northeastern part of the Republic of Mordovia, between 54°43'N and 54°53'N, and 45°04'E and 45°37'E. The park lies within the landscapes of mixed forests on fluvioglacial and ancient alluvial plains along the left bank of the Alatyr River (Yamashkin 2000).

Figure 1.Locations of the sampling sites (red dots) in the Republic of Mordovia (Russia) (A) and the location of the region in Europe (B).

The material was collected in the Republic of Mordovia (Russia) during 2019–2024. The majority of data were gathered from two federal protected areas: Mordovia State Nature Reserve (MSNR) and the National Park "Smolny" (NPS). Insect collection was conducted using Malaise traps (Skvarla et al. 2021), pan traps (Csanády et al. 2021), light traps (Singh et al. 2022), and handheld sweep nets.

Full coordinates of the capture sites are provided in the "Material" section and are also available through the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (Esin et al. 2024). Abbreviations used in the text include MSNR for Mordovia State Nature Reserve and NPS for National Park "Smolny" (Ichalki District).

New distributional records are indicated with asterisks as follows: (*) marks a new record for the Republic of Mordovia; (**) marks a new record for Russia; and (***) marks a new record for the Palaearctic region.

Specimens were identified by the second author. The following references were primarily used for species determination: Chandler (2022), Zaitzev (1994, 1999, 2003). Photographs of the specimens were taken by the second author using an eTREK DCM900 camera. Collected specimens are deposited in the collections of the Zoological Museum of Lomonosov Moscow State University (Russia). Additionally, a comprehensive species list for the fauna of Mordovia has been uploaded to the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF), which also documents details of the capture methods (Esin et al. 2024).

Results and discussion

The annotated checklist includes 309 species from the families Bolitophilidae (4 species), Diadocidiidae (3), Ditomyiidae (1), Keroplatidae (28), and Mycetophilidae (273) (Table 1). Among these are species new to Russia (Orfelia boreoalpina, Mycetophila rudis, Neoclastobasis draskovitsae, Novakia scatopsiformis), as well as a species new to the Palearctic region (Sciophila emarginata). Additionally, 242 species have been recorded for the first time in the fauna of the Republic of Mordovia.

Table 1. Checklist of Fungus Gnats of the Republic of Mordovia

Mordovia State Nature Reserve National Park "Smolny" Other district
Family Bolitophilidae
*Bolitophila cinerea Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Bolitophila acuta Garrett, 1925 + - -
Bolitophila modesta Lackschewitz, 1937 + - -
*Bolitophila rossica Landrock, 1912 + - -
Family Diadocidiidae
*Diadocidia ferruginosa (Meigen, 1830) + - -
*Diadocidia setistylus Papp, 2003 + - -
*Diadocidia spinosula Tollet, 1948 + - -
Family Ditomyiidae
*Ditomyia fasciata (Meigen, 1818) + - -
Family Keroplatidae
Isoneuromyia semirufa (Meigen, 1818) + - -
Keroplatus testaceus Dalman, 1818 + - -
Keroplatus tipuloides Bosc, 1792 - - +
*Macrocera anglica Edwards, 1925 - + -
*Macrocera angulata Meigen, 1818 + - -
Macrocera centralis Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Macrocera fascipennis Staeger, 1840 + - -
*Macrocera inversa Loew, 1869 - + -
*Macrocera longibrachiata Landrock, 1917 + + -
*Macrocera lutea Meigen, 1804 + - -
*Macrocera maculata Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Macrocera phalerata Meigen, 1818 - + -
*Macrocera pilosa Landrock, 1917 + - -
*Macrocera pumilio Loew, 1869 - + -
*Macrocera stigma Curtis, 1837 + - -
*Macrorrhyncha rostrata (Zetterstedt, 1851) + + -
Monocentrota lundstroemi Edwards, 1925 + - -
Neoplatyura flava (Macquart, 1826) + - -
Neoplatyura modesta (Winnertz, 1864) + + +
**Orfelia boreoalpina Salmela in Salmela & Kolcsár, 2017 + - -
*Orfelia discoloria (Meigen, 1818) + + -
*Orfelia fasciata (Meigen, 1804) + - -
Orfelia lugubris (Zetterstedt, 1851) - - +
*Orfelia nemoralis (Meigen, 1818) + + +
*Orfelia nigricornis (Fabricius, 1805) + + -
*Orfelia ochracea (Meigen, 1818) + + -
Pyratula zonata (Zetterstedt, 1855) + - -
*Urytalpa dorsalis (Staeger, 1840) + - -
Family Mycetophilidae
*Acnemia nitidicollis (Meigen, 1818) + + -
*Allocotocera pulchella (Curtis, 1837) + - -
*Allodia ornaticollis (Meigen, 1818) + + -
*Allodia zaitzevi Kurina, 1998 + - -
Allodiopsis domestica (Meigen, 1830) + + +
*Allodiopsis rustica (Edwards, 1941) + - -
*Anatella dampfi Landrock, 1924 - + +
*Anatella simpatica Dziedzicki, 1923 + + -
*Anatella turi Dziedzicki, 1923 + - -
Anatella unguigera Edwards, 1921 + - -
*Azana anomala (Staeger, 1840) - + -
*Boletina anderschi Stannius, 1881 + - -
Boletina basalis (Meigen, 1818) + + -
*Boletina bidenticulata Sasakawa & Kimura, 1974 + + -
Boletina cincticornis (Walker, 1848) + - -
Boletina dispecta Dziedzicki, 1885 + - -
Boletina dubia (Meigen, 1804) + - -
Boletina gripha Dziedzicki, 1885 + + -
*Boletina griphoides Edwards, 1925 - + -
*Boletina lundstroemi Landrock, 1912 - + -
Boletina moravica Landrock, 1912 + + -
*Boletina nigricans Dziedzicki, 1885 - + -
Boletina nigricoxa Staeger, 1840 + - +
*Boletina nitida Grzegorzek, 1885 + + -
*Boletina pallidula Edwards, 1925 + - -
*Boletina populina Polevoi in Zaitzev & Polevoi, 1995 + + -
*Boletina rejecta Edwards, 1941 + - -
*Boletina sciarina Staeger, 1840 + + -
*Boletina silvatica Dziedzicki, 1885 - + -
Boletina trivittata (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Brachycampta alternans (Zetterstedt, 1838) + - -
*Brachycampta barbata (Lundstrom, 1909) + + -
*Brachycampta foliifera (Strobl, 1910) + - -
*Brachycampta grata (Meigen, 1830) + - -
Brachycampta neglecta Edwards, 1925 + - +
*Brachycampta persolla Plassmann, 1972 + - -
*Brachycampta pistillata (Lundstrom, 1911) + - -
Brachycampta silvatica (Landrock, 1912) + - -
*Brachypeza (Brachypeza) bisignata Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Brevicornu arcticoides Caspers, 1985 + - -
*Brevicornu bellum (Johannsen, 1912) + - -
*Brevicornu fennicum (Landrock, 1927) + - -
*Brevicornu fissicauda (Lundstrom, 1911) + - -
Brevicornu fuscipenne (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Brevicornu griseicolle (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Brevicornu serenum (Winnertz, 1864) + - -
Brevicornu sericoma (Meigen, 1830) + - -
*Clastobasis alternans (Winnertz, 1864) - + -
*Clastobasis loici Chandler, 2001 + - -
*Coelophthinia loraasi Kjaerandsen in Kjaerandsen et al. 2023 + - -
*Coelophthinia thoracica (Winnertz, 1864) - + -
Cordyla brevicornis (Staeger, 1840) + - -
Cordyla crassicornis Meigen, 1818 + + +
Cordyla fasciata Meigen, 1830 - + +
Cordyla flaviceps (Staeger, 1840) + - -
Cordyla fusca Meigen, 1804 + - +
Cordyla insons Lastovka & Matile, 1974 - + +
Cordyla murina Winnertz, 1864 + - +
*Cordyla nitens Winnertz, 1864 + + -
Cordyla nitidula Edwards, 1925 + + +
*Cordyla parvipalpis Edwards, 1925 + - +
Cordyla pusilla Edwards, 1925 - - +
*Cordyla semiflava (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Cordyla sixi (Barendrecht, 1938) + + +
*Docosia gilvipes (Haliday in Walker, 1856) + - -
*Dynatosoma cochleare Strobl, 1895 + - -
*Dynatosoma fuscicorne (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Dynatosoma majus Landrock, 1912 + - -
*Dynatosoma nigromaculatum Lundstrom, 1913 + - -
*Dynatosoma nobile Loew, 1873 + - -
*Dynatosoma reciprocum (Walker, 1848) + - -
*Dynatosoma rufescens (Zetterstedt, 1838) + - -
Dynatosoma thoracicum (Zetterstedt, 1838) + + +
*Ectrepesthoneura bucera Plassmann, 1980 - + -
*Ectrepesthoneura colyeri Chandler, 1980 + + -
*Ectrepesthoneura hirta (Winnertz, 1846) + + -
*Ectrepesthoneura pubescens (Zetterstedt, 1860) + - -
Epicypta aterrima (Zetterstedt, 1852) + + +
Epicypta fumigata (Dziedzicki, 1923) + + -
*Epicypta scatophora (Perris, 1849) + - -
*Exechia chandleri Caspers, 1987 + + -
*Exechia dizona Edwards, 1924 + + -
Exechia dorsalis (Staeger, 1840) + - +
*Exechia festiva Winnertz, 1864 + - -
Exechia fusca (Meigen, 1804) + + +
*Exechia macula Chandler, 2001 - + -
*Exechia neorepanda Lindemann, 2021 - + -
*Exechia nigrofusca Lundstrom, 1909 + - -
*Exechia nigroscutellata Landrock, 1912 + - -
*Exechia papyracea Stackelberg, 1948 + - -
*Exechia parva Lundstrom, 1909 + - -
*Exechia pseudocincta Strobl, 1910 + - -
Exechia repanda Johannsen, 1912 + + +
*Exechia repandoides Caspers, 1984 + + -
Exechia separata Lundstrom, 1912 + - +
*Exechia seriata (Meigen, 1830) + + -
*Exechia spinuligera Lundstrom, 1912 - + -
*Exechia ussuriensis Zaitzev, 2003 + - -
*Exechiopsis lackschewitziana (Stackelberg, 1948) + - -
*Exechiopsis pulchella (Winnertz, 1864) - - +
*Exechiopsis subulata (Winnertz, 1864) + - -
*Exechiopsis davatchii Matile, 1969 + - -
*Exechiopsis membranacea (Lundstrom, 1912) + - +
*Exechiopsis seducta (Plassmann, 1976) + - -
Greenomyia mongolica Lastovka & Matile, 1974 + - +
*Grzegorzekia collaris (Meigen, 1818) - + -
*Impleta consorta Plassmann, 1978 + - -
*Leia bilineata (Winnertz, 1864) + - -
*Leia bimaculata (Meigen, 1804) + + -
*Leia cylindrica (Winnertz, 1864) + + -
Leia fascipennis Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Leia picta Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Leia subfasciata (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Leia winthemii Lehmann, 1822 + + -
*Leptomorphus walkeri Curtis, 1831 + - -
*Macrobrachius kowarzii Dziedzicki, 1889 + - -
*Monoclona orientalis Zaitzev, 1983 + - -
*Monoclona rufilatera (Walker, 1837) + + -
*Monoclona silvatica Zaitzev, 1983 - + -
*Mycetophila adumbrata Mik, 1884 + - -
Mycetophila alea Laffoon, 1965 + - +
Mycetophila attonsa Laffoon, 1957 + - -
*Mycetophila autumnalis Lundstrom, 1909 + + -
*Mycetophila bialorussica Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila blanda Winnertz, 1864 + - +
*Mycetophila caudata Staeger, 1840 + + -
*Mycetophila confluens Dziedzicki, 1884 + - +
*Mycetophila confusa Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila deflexa Chandler, 2001 + - -
*Mycetophila dentata Lundstrom, 1915 + - -
*Mycetophila distigma Meigen, 1830 + - -
*Mycetophila dziedzickii Chandler, 1977 + - -
*Mycetophila finlandica Edwards, 1913 + - -
*Mycetophila forcipata Lundstrom, 1913 + - -
*Mycetophila formosa Lundstrom, 1911 + - -
Mycetophila fungorum (De Geer, 1776) + + +
*Mycetophila gibbula Edwards, 1925 + - -
*Mycetophila ichneumonea Say, 1823 + - -
*Mycetophila idonea Lastovka, 1972 + - -
*Mycetophila laeta Walker, 1848 + - -
*Mycetophila lapponica Lundstrom, 1906 + - -
*Mycetophila lastovkai Caspers, 1984 + - -
*Mycetophila lobulata Zaitzev, 1999 + - -
*Mycetophila lubomirskii Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila luctuosa Meigen, 1830 + + -
*Mycetophila magnicauda Strobl, 1895 + - -
*Mycetophila marginata Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Mycetophila mohilevensis Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila montana Landrock, 1925 - + -
*Mycetophila moravica Landrock, 1925 + - -
*Mycetophila nigrofusca Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila ocellus Walker, 1848 + - -
*Mycetophila pictula Meigen, 1830 + - -
*Mycetophila plotnikovae Zaitzev, 2004 + - -
*Mycetophila pseudoforcipata Zaitzev, 1998 + - -
*Mycetophila pumila Winnertz, 1864 - + -
**Mycetophila rudis Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Mycetophila ruficollis Meigen, 1818 + - -
Mycetophila sepulta (Laffoon, 1957) - - +
*Mycetophila sierrae (Laffoon, 1957) + - -
*Mycetophila sigillata Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila sigmoides Loew, 1869 + - +
Mycetophila signata Meigen, 1830 + - +
*Mycetophila signatoides Dziedzicki, 1884 + + -
*Mycetophila sordida van der Wulp, 1874 + + -
Mycetophila stolida Walker, 1856 - - +
*Mycetophila stricklandi (Laffoon, 1957) + - -
Mycetophila strigatoides Landrock, 1927 + - -
*Mycetophila stylata (Dziedzicki, 1884) + - -
*Mycetophila sublunata Zaitzev, 1998 + - -
*Mycetophila subnigrofusca Zaitzev, 1998 + - -
*Mycetophila subsigillata Zaitzev, 1999 + - -
*Mycetophila sumavica (Lastovka, 1963) + - -
*Mycetophila telei Zaitzev, 1999 + - -
Mycetophila triangulata Dziedzicki, 1884 + - -
*Mycetophila trinotata Staeger, 1840 + + -
*Mycetophila uliginosa Chandler, 1988 + - -
*Mycetophila unguiculata Lundstrom, 1913 + - -
*Mycetophila unicolor Stannius, 1831 + + -
Mycetophila unipunctata Meigen, 1818 + - -
*Mycetophila uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 + - -
*Mycomya branderi Vaisanen, 1984 + - -
*Mycomya circumdata (Staeger, 1840) + - -
Mycomya annulata (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Mycomya cinerascens (Macquart, 1826) + - -
*Mycomya danielae Matile, 1972 + - -
*Mycomya dziedzickii Vaisanen, 1984 + - -
*Mycomya egregia (Dziedzicki, 1885) + - -
*Mycomya flavicollis (Zetterstedt, 1852) + - -
*Mycomya marginata (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Mycomya neohyalinata Vaisanen, 1984 + - -
Mycomya occultans (Winnertz, 1864) + + -
*Mycomya onusta (Loew, 1869) + - -
*Mycomya tumida (Winnertz, 1864) + - -
*Mycomya wankowiczii (Dziedzicki, 1885) + - -
*Mycomya affinis (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Mycomya penicillata (Dziedzicki, 1885) + + +
*Mycomya trilineata (Zetterstedt, 1838) + - -
*Myrosia maculosa (Meigen, 1818) + - -
**Neoclastobasis draskovitsae Matile, 1978 + - -
*Neoempheria bimaculata (von Roser, 1840) + - -
Neoempheria brevilineata Okada, 1939 + - -
Neoempheria pictipennis (Haliday, 1833) + + -
*Neoempheria striata (Meigen, 1818) + + -
*Neoempheria winnertzi Edwards, 1913 + - -
*Notolopha cristata (Staeger, 1840) + - -
**Novakia scatopsiformis Strobl, 1893 + + -
*Palaeodocosia vittata (Coquillett, 1901) + - -
*Phronia biarcuata (Becker, 1908) + - +
*Phronia bicolor Dziedzicki, 1889 + - -
*Phronia braueri Dziedzicki, 1889 + - -
*Phronia cinerascens Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phronia conformis (Walker, 1856) + + -
*Phronia coritanica Chandler, 1992 - + -
*Phronia disgrega Dziedzicki, 1889 + - -
*Phronia exigua (Zetterstedt, 1852) + - -
*Phronia forcipata Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phronia forcipula Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phronia longelamellata Strobl, 1898 + - -
*Phronia nigricornis (Zetterstedt, 1852) + + -
*Phronia nitidiventris (van der Wulp, 1859) + - -
*Phronia obtusa Winnertz, 1864 + + -
*Phronia siebeckii Dziedzicki, 1889 + - -
*Phronia strenua Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phronia taczanowskyi Dziedzicki, 1889 - + -
*Phronia tenuis Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phronia triangularis Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Phthinia mira (Ostroverkhova, 1977) + + -
*Phthinia winnertzi Mik, 1869 + - -
*Platurocypta punctum (Stannius, 1831) + + -
Platurocypta testata (Edwards, 1925) + - -
*Polylepta guttiventris (Zetterstedt, 1852) + - -
*Pseudexechia trivittata (Staeger, 1840) + - +
Rondaniella dimidiata (Meigen, 1804) + - +
*Rymosia armata Lackschewitz, 1937 + - -
*Rymosia bifida Edwards, 1925 + - -
*Rymosia fasciata (Meigen, 1804) + - -
Rymosia signatipes (van der Wulp, 1859) + - +
Sceptonia costata (van der Wulp, 1859) + - +
Sceptonia demeijerei Bechev, 1997 + + +
*Sceptonia flavipuncta Edwards, 1925 - + -
Sceptonia fumipes Edwards, 1925 + + -
*Sceptonia hamata Sevcik, 2004 - + -
*Sceptonia longiseta Sevcik, 2004 - + -
Sceptonia nigra (Meigen, 1804) + + +
*Sceptonia thaya Sevcik, 2004 + + -
***Sciophila emarginata Zaitzev, 1982 + - -
*Sciophila fenestella Curtis, 1837 + - -
*Sciophila thoracica Staeger, 1840 + + -
*Sciophila varia (Winnertz, 1864) + - -
*Stigmatomeria crassicornis (Stannius, 1831) + - +
*Synapha vitripennis (Meigen, 1818) + - -
*Synplasta bayardi (Matile, 1971) - - +
Synplasta dulcia (Dziedzicki, 1910) + - -
Synplasta exclusa (Dziedzicki, 1910) + - -
*Synplasta gracilis Winnertz, 1864 + - +
*Tetragoneura pudogensis Polevoi & Jakovlev, 2011 + - -
*Tetragoneura sylvatica (Curtis, 1837) + - -
*Trichonta apicalis Strobl, 1898 + - -
*Trichonta beata Gagne, 1981 + - -
*Trichonta flavicauda Lundstrom, 1914 + - -
*Trichonta girschneri Landrock, 1912 + + -
*Trichonta patens Johannsen, 1912 + - +
*Trichonta perspicua van der Wulp, 1881 + - -
*Trichonta submaculata (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Trichonta tristis (Strobl, 1898) + - -
*Trichonta vitta (Meigen, 1830) + + -
*Zygomyia humeralis (Wiedemann, 1817) + - -
Zygomyia notata (Stannius, 1831) + + +
Zygomyia pictipennis (Staeger, 1840) + - -
*Zygomyia pseudohumeralis Caspers, 1980 + - -
Zygomyia valida Winnertz, 1864 + - -
*Zygomyia vara (Staeger, 1840) + - +
Total of species 275 91 47
Table 1.Checklist of Fungus Gnats of the Republic of Mordovia

Note: * – first record from Republic of Mordovia; ** – first record from Russia; *** – first record from the Palaearctic region.

Family Keroplatidae

** Orfelia boreoalpina

Fig. 2

Material. MSNR: cordon Inorskiy (54.7277°N, 43.1510°E), Malaise trap, 25–31.05.2021, 1♂, Leg. A. Ruchin, M. Esin; 3 km NW of Pushta (54.744°N, 43.204°E),

hand held sweep-net, 14.09.2023, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. West Palaearctic region (Germany, Finland). First record from Russia.

Remarks. The specimen was caught in a Malaise trap located at the boundary of a floodplain deciduous forest and a large forest clearing (Fig. 3). The clearing was characterized by diverse herbaceous vegetation, predominantly grasses. The forest was mainly composed of oak with some linden and birch, and the second layer in cluded rowan and bird cherry.

The second specimen was found in a mixed old-growth forest with pine, spruce, birch, and linden. The shrub layer was well-developed, and the herbaceous vegetation consisted mainly of grasses and lily of the valley. Surrounding the area were swampy patches with moss, as well as mixed forests with pine and spruce. These habitats contained many stumps and fallen wood.

In Finland, this species was captured in a flooded herbaceous meadow with a rich variety of vascular plants. The meadow was surrounded by pine forest (Salmela and Kolcsár 2017). In Bavaria, its habitat was a mountainous forest dominated by coniferous species (Geiger et al. 2016).

Figure 2.Orfelia boreoalpina Salmela in Salmela & Kolcsár, 2017, male hypopygium (ventral view).

Figure 3.Malaise trap located on the cordon Inorskiy (Mordovia State Nature Reserve) is a catch place for a large number of interesting species of fungus gnats.

Family Mycetophilidae

** Mycetophila rudis Winnertz, 1864

Fig. 4

Material. MSNR: cordon Novenkiy (54.709°N, 43.212°E), yellow pan traps, 20– 28.08.2022, 1♂, Leg. K. Tomkovich; 3 km NW of Pushta (54.744°N, 43.204°E), hand held sweep-net, 14.09.2023, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin; Pushta (54.71849°N, 43.23413°E), hand held sweep-net, 13.07, 16.07.2024, 3♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. Europe and Oriental (Kjærandsen et al. 2007). First record from Russia (also known from Moscow region, Leg. D. Gavryushin, pers. comm.)

Remarks. The species was found in several localities within the Mordovia State Nature Reserve (MSNR). These habitats are moderately moist mixed forests with a significant presence of deciduous tree species, including aspen, alder, birch, and occasionally linden. These sites are characterized by an abundance of stumps and fallen wood.

In other regions, the species has also been recorded in coniferous plantations (Chandler 2022).

Figure 4.Mycetophila rudis Winnertz, 1864, male hypopygium (a – dorsal view; b – caudal view; c – ventral view).

** Neoclastobasis draskovitsae Matile, 1978

Fig. 5

Material. MSNR: cordon Inorskiy (54.7277°N, 43.1510°E), Malaise trap, 18– 22.06.2021, 1♂, Leg. A. Ruchin, M. Esin; Pushta (54.7195°N, 43.2234°E), Malaise trap, 27–30.06.2023, 1♀, Leg. K. Tomkovich.

General distribution. West Palaearctic region. Described from Hungary, also known from Czech Republic and Slovakia (Kurina et al. 2024). First record from Russia.

Remarks. The collection sites were similar to those of Orfelia boreoalpina. The species is associated with Lactarius vellereus and Lactarius acerrimus (Matile 1978) as well as the sporocarps of Meripilus giganteus (Roháček and Ševčík 2013).

Figure 5.Neoclastobasis draskovitsae Matile, 1978, male hypopygium (a – ventral view; b – dorsal view; c – caudal view).

** Novakia scatopsiformis Strobl, 1893

Fig. 6

Material. NPS, cordon Mokrov (54.7591°N, 45.6124°E), Malaise trap, 17–24.08.2022, 24–29.08.2022, 2♀, G. Semishin; MSNR: Pushta (54.7195°N, 43.2234°E), Malaise trap, 19–31.07.2023, 1♂, Leg. K. Tomkovich; cordon Valzenskiy (54.7203°N, 43.2345°E), yellow pan traps, 12–20.08.2023, 1♀, Leg. K. Tomkovich.

General distribution. West Palaearctic region. Rare, mostly Mediterranean yet reaches as far north as Sweden. First record from Russia (also known from Moscow region, Leg. D. Gavryushin, pers. comm.)

Remarks. In the National Park "Smolny" (NPS), the specimen was collected in a Malaise trap located at the border of a pine forest (approximately 60-70 years old) and an open clearing. The shrub layer in the pine forest was poorly developed, with only a few rowan and bird cherry trees. The herbaceous vegetation was primarily composed of grasses. The clearing was characterized by a large variety of vascular plants. Both the pine forest and the clearing are situated on the second floodplain terrace, which is notably dry in this area. However, a floodplain meadow, typically flooded by spring runoff, is located 100 meters away (Fig. 7).

In the Mordovia State Nature Reserve (MSNR), the collection sites were similar to those for Orfelia boreoalpina and Neoclastobasis draskovitsae. In other countries, the species is described as inhabiting the coastal thickets of Pinus brutia (Kerr 2007).

*** Sciophila emarginata Zaitzev, 1982

Fig. 8

Material. MSNR, cordon Inorskiy (54.7277°N, 43.1510°E), Malaise trap, 20– 25.05.2021, 1♂, Leg. A. Ruchin, M. Esin.

General distribution. Nearctic region. First record from the Palaearctic region.

Remarks. The sampling site is similar to the habitat where Orfelia boreoalpina was found and where the Malaise trap was located.

Figure 6.Novakia scatopsiformis Strobl, 1893, male hypopygium (a – ventral view; b – lateral view; c – dorsal view).

Figure 7.Malaise trap located on the cordon Mokrov (National Park "Smolny") is a catch place for a large number of interesting species of fungus gnats.

Figure 8.Sciophila emarginata Zaitzev, 1982, male hypopygium (a – dorsal view; b – ventral view).

Clastobasis loici Chandler, 2001

Fig. 9A

Material. MSNR, Pushta (54.708°N, 43.201°E), hand held sweep-net, 14.07.2024, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. Palaearctic region. Very rare, scattered records throughout Western and Central Europe, recently recorded from Japan and Georgia.

Remarks. The site of the finding is a wet deciduous forest, primarily composed of aspen, alder, and linden. The shrub layer and herbaceous cover are poorly devel oped due to high shading.

Tetragoneura pudogensis

Fig. 9B

Material. MSNR, 3.5 km NW of Pushta (54.732 °N, 43.173 °E), hand held sweep-net, 12.09.2023, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. Northern Europe (Russia: Republic of Karelia; Finland).

Remarks. The specimen was found in a mixed forest with a predominance of deciduous trees (linden, aspen, oak). The shrub layer is very well-developed, consisting of young trees from the first layer. The herbaceous layer is poorly expressed. The forest floor is covered with a lot of fallen wood.

Grzegorzekia collaris (Meigen, 1818)

Fig. 9C

Material. NPS: cordon Mokrov (54.7591°N, 45.6124°E), Malaise trap, 24.06–5.07.2022, 1♂, G. Semishin; cordon Mitryashki (54.745°N, 45.503°E), hand held sweep-net, 26–29.07.2022, 1♂, Leg. K. Tomkovich.

General distribution. Palaearctic region. Rare; in Russia known from Republic of Karelia, also in Moscow region (Leg. D. Gavryushin, pers. comm.).

Remarks. One sampling site is similar to the habitat of Novakia scatopsiformis. The second sampling site is also located on the second floodplain terrace. However, the conditions in this habitat are more diverse, due to the variety of forest ecosystems: both pure pine forests and floodplain forests of linden, oak, and alder are present. Nearby, in the floodplain, there are lakes, and the evaporation from them creates high humidity.

Impleta consorta Plassmann, 1978

Fig. 9D

Material. MSNR: Pushta (54.721°N, 43.218°E), hand held sweep-net, 6.06.2023, 1♂, Leg. K. Tomkovich; Pushta (54.7191°N, 43.2236°E), on light, 23–24.07.2023, 2♂, Leg. K. Tomkovich.

General distribution. West Palaearctic region. Rare; in Russia known from Republic of Karelia.

Remarks. The sampling sites were several forest areas: an old-growth birch forest with well-developed herbaceous vegetation, located near a mixed forest with many oaks; a mixed forest of aspen, birch, and linden, with a well-developed shrub layer and herbaceous cover.

Macrobrachius kowarzii Dziedzicki, 1889

Fig. 9E

Material. MSNR, cordon Inorskiy (54.7277°N, 43.1510°E), Malaise trap, 27.09– 4.10.2021, 1♂, Leg. A. Ruchin, M. Esin.

General distribution. Europe. Very rare; in Russia known from Republic of Karelia, also in Moscow region (Leg. D. Gavryushin, pers. comm.).

Remarks. The specimen was captured in a Malaise trap located at the boundary of a floodplain deciduous forest and a large forest clearing (Fig. 3). The habitat description has been provided earlier.

Mycetophila telei Zaitzev, 1999

Fig. 9F

Material. MSNR: 5 km N Pushta (54.765°N, 43.222°E), hand held sweep-net, 14.09.2024, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin; Pushta (54.7184°N, 43.2341°E), hand held sweep-net, 13, 14, 16.07.2024, 3♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. Palaearctic region. Described from Altai Mts. (Russia), also known from Austria.

Remarks. Both localities are mixed forests located near bodies of water. Closer to the water, alder and aspen dominate, which are flooded by meltwater in the spring. Further from the water, on drier soils, pine predominates, along with linden and birch. In the second layer, young deciduous trees, as well as bird cherry, spindle, and rowan, are common. The herbaceous layer is poorly developed due to shading. The habitat contains many fallen logs. This is the second record of the species in Russia. The first record was made in the Altai (Zaitzev 1999).

Mycetophila uschaica

Fig. 9G

Material. MSNR: 0.5 km SW of Pushta (54.708°N, 43.223°E), hand held sweep-net, 10.09.2023, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin; Pushta (54.7184°N, 43.2341°E), hand held sweep-net, 16.07.2024, 1♂, Leg. D. Gavryushin.

General distribution. Palaearctic region (Russia: Western Siberia: Tomsk region; Republic of Karelia, also known from Moscow region, Leg. D. Gavryushin, pers. comm.)

Remarks. The habitats are similar to those of Mycetophila telei and Clastobasis loici. In Karelia, the species was collected in a spruce forest dominated by Vaccinium myrtillus (Jakovlev et al. 2014). In the Mordovian habitats, V. myrtillus is present in the swampy areas, but the number of spruce trees in the forests is very low.

The region contains two federal protected areas: Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny". In the Mordovia State Nature Reserve, 275 species were recorded during the studies, while 91 species were noted in National Park "Smolny", and 47 species were found in other localities of the region.

During the research, the highest biodiversity of fungus gnats was recorded in July and September, with the lowest biodiversity observed in October and Novem ber (Fig. 10).

Due to the vast diversity of insects and the wide range of data collection methods, insect fauna studies are generally not standardized. Therefore, using a variety of methods leads to the most comprehensive information on biodiversity (Montgomery et al. 2021; Grames et al. 2022). In our study, we also employed different collection methods, which reflected in the final results. Based on the data set analysis (Esin et al. 2024), we found that the highest species diversity of fungus gnats was captured using a hand-held sweep net (Fig. 11), while the lowest species diversity was captured using light traps. Despite the limited use of Malaise traps, they also provided good results in terms of the total number of species.

We compared the number of fungus gnat species in regions neighboring the Republic of Mordovia (Table 2). It was found that this group of families is poorly studied and unevenly researched (we have no data from the Ryazan, Nizhny Novgorod, and Penza regions). Apparently, this reflects difficulties in species identification and the limited number of studies on regional fauna.

Figure 9.Rare species fungus gnats, male hypopygium: A Clastobasis loici Chandler, 2001 (1 – dorsal view; 2 – lateral view; 3 – ventral view); B Tetragoneura pudogensis Polevoi & Jakovlev, 2011 (1 – dorsal view; 2 – oblique caudal view; 3 – ventral view); C Grzegorzekia collaris (Meigen, 1818) (dorsal view); D Impleta consorta Plassmann, 1978 (lateral view); E Macrobrachius kowarzii Dziedzicki, 1889 (ventral view); F Mycetophila telei Zaitzev, 1999 (ventral view); G Mycetophila uschaica Subbotina & Maximova, 2011 (ventral view).

Figure 10.Seasonal species diversity (A) and the number of specimens (B) of fungus gnats in the Republic of Mordovia, collected using all trapping methods.

Figure 11.Species diversity (A) and number of specimens (B) of fungus gnats in the Re public of Mordovia, collected using different trapping methods.

Table 2. Comparative biodiversity of studied fungus gnat families in several regions of Russia

Regions 1 2 3 4 5 References
Chuvash Republic - - - - 5 Borisova et al. 2018; Esin, Egorov 2023
Republic of Mordovia 4 3 1 28 273 Our data; Esin et al. 2023
Samara region 2 - - 1 8 Lyubvina 2022
Ulyanovsk region - - - - 5 Ruchin et al. 2023
Volgograd region - - - 1 - Ruchin et al. 2023
Voronezh region - - - - 5 Ruchin et al. 2023
Table 2.Comparative biodiversity of studied fungus gnat families in several regions of Russia

Notes: 1 – Bolitophilidae, 2- Diadocidiidae, 3- Ditomyiidae, 4 -Keroplatidae, 5 - Mycetophilidae

Acknowledgements

This article was funded by the Russian Science Foundation, grant number 22-14- 00026. The research on the territory of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park “Smolny” was carried out with the financing of the State Assignment of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Ecology of the Russian Federation on the topic of research work No 1-25-31-4.

References

Astakhov DM, Ruchin AB, Romadina OD, Pristrem IM (2019) To robber flies fauna (Diptera: Asilidae) of Mordovia, Russia. Biodiversitas 20(4): 994–1005. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d200409

Borisova NV, Woźnica AJ, Soszyńska-Maj А (2018) Some data about the winter active Diptera (Insecta) of the Chuvash Republic. Scientific Proceedings of the State Nature Reserve Prisursky 33: 91–97. [In Russian]

Chandler PJ (2022) Fungus gnats (Diptera: Mycetophilidae, Mycetophilinae). RES Handbooks for the Identification of British Insects 9(8), 408 pp. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781800625334.0000

Chursina MA, Ruchin AB (2018) A checklist of Bombyliidae (Diptera) from Mordovia, Russia and variation of wing shape in Bombylius species. Biodiversitas 19(6): 2147–2156. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d190622

Courtney GW, Pape T, Skevington JH, Sinclair BJ (2017) Biodiversity of diptera. In: Foottit RG, Adler PH (Eds) Insect biodiversity: science and society. Wiley-Blackwell, 229–278. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118945568.ch9

Csanády A, Oboňa J, Zapletalová L, Panigaj Ľ, Dojčaková D, Záleta B (2021) Hymenopteran color preference using multiple colours of pan traps in Slovakia. Acta Musei Silesiae Scientiae Naturales 70(1): 33–46. https://doi.org/10.2478/cszma-2021-0002

D'Souza ML, Van der Bank M, Shongwe Z, Rattray RD, Stewart R, Van Rooyen J, Govender D, Hebert PDN (2021) Biodiversity baselines: tracking insects in Kruger National Park with DNA barcodes. Biological Conservation 256: 109034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109034

Dvořák L, Ruchin AB, Egorov LV, Aleksanov VV, Alekseev SK, Shulaev NV, Zakharova EYu (2023) Distribution of species from the genus Panorpa (Mecoptera, Panorpidae) in European Russia except the Caucasus. Nature Conservation Research 8(1): 24–33. https://dx.doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2023.001

Dvořák L, Dvořáková K, Oboňa J, Ruchin AB (2020) Selected Diptera families caught with BTs in the Republic of Mordovia (Russia). Nature Conservation Research 5(4): 65–77. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2020.057

Dvorak V, Kasap OE, Ivovic V et al. (2020) Sand flies (Diptera: Psychodidae) in eight Balkan countries: historical review and region-wide entomological survey. Parasites Vectors 13: 573. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-020-04448-w

Esin M, Gavryushin D, Ruchin A, Semishin G (2024) Fungus gnats (Diptera) of the Republic of Mordovia. Version 1.8. Joint Directorate of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve and National Park "Smolny". Occurrence dataset https://doi.org/10.15468/gn53j5 (accessed via GBIF.org on 2024-09-18).

Esin MN, Egorov LV (2023) New data on the Diptera (Insecta) of the Chuvash Republic. Scientific proceedings of the Prisursky State Nature Reserve 38: 185–189. [In Russian]

Esin MN, Ruchin AB, Gavryushin DI, Xi YQ, Dvořák L, Dvořáková K (2023) Diptera species, new for the Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Nature Conservation Research 8(2): 98–105. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2023.011

Geiger M, Moriniere J, Hausmann A, Haszprunar G, Wägele W, Hebert P, Rulik B (2016) Testing the Global Malaise Trap Program – How well does the current barcode reference library identify flying insects in Germany? Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e10671. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e10671

Gornostaev NG, Ruchin AB, Esin MN, Kulikov AM (2022) Seasonal dynamics of fruit flies (Diptera: Drosophilidae) in forests of the European Russia. Insects 13: 751. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects13080751

Grames EM, Montgomery GA, Boyes DH, Dicks LV, Forister ML et al. (2022) A framework and case study to systematically identify long‐term insect abundance and diversity datasets. Conservation Science and Practice 4(6): e12687. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.12687

Grichanov IYa (2021) New records of Dolichopodidae (Diptera) from Mordovia, Russia. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin 17(1): 129–139. https://doi.org/10.23885/181433262021171-129139

Hubenov Z (2019) Distribution and Comparative Characteristics of the Dipteran Fauna (Insecta: Diptera) of the Vrachanska Planina, Vitosha, Rila and Pirin Mountains, Bulgaria. Acta Zoologica Bulgarica 71(4): 501–518.

Jakovlev J, Salmela J, Polevoi A, Penttinen J, Vartija N (2014) Recent noteworthy findings of fungus gnats from Finland and northwestern Russia (Diptera: Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae, Bolitophilidae and Mycetophilidae). Biodiversity Data Journal 2: e1068. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.2.e1068

Kerr PH (2007) Revision of the Holarctic genus Novakia Strobl (Diptera: Mycetophilidae). Zootaxa 1554(1): 27–40. https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1554.1.2

Kjærandsen J, Hedmark K, Kurina O, Polevoi A, Økland B, Götmark F (2007) Annotated checklist of fungus gnats from Sweden (Diptera: Bolitophilidae, Diadocidiidae, Ditomyiidae, Keroplatidae and Mycetophilidae). Insect Systematics and Evolution Supplements 65: 1–128.

Köthe S, Schneider FD, Bakanov N, Brühl CA, Eichler L et al. (2023) Improving insect conservation management through insect monitoring and stakeholder involvement. Biodivers Conserv 32: 691–713. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-022-02519-1

Kurina O, Manko P, Oboňa J (2024) Bibionomorph gnats (Diptera: Nematocera) collected from Lažany village, Slovakia. Acta Musei Silesiae, Scientiae Naturales 73(2): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.2478/cszma-2024-0011

Lutovinovas E, Ruchin AB, Semishin GB, Esin MN (2022) New data on the hoverflies (Diptera, Syrphidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russian Federation) with an updated checklist of species. Entomological Review 102(4): 498–529. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873822040091

Lyubvina IV (2022) Long-horned flies of the Zhiguli Reserve. Samara Region in the history of Russia 8: 102–105. [In Russian]

MacGowan I, Ruchin AB (2022) Two new species of Lonchaeidae (Diptera: Schizophora) from the Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Russian Entomological Journal 31(1): 83–86. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.31.1.17

MacGowan, Vikhrev NE, Krivosheina MG, Ruchin AB, Esin MN (2021) New records of Diptera from the Republic of Mordovia, Russia. Far Eastern Entomologist 423: 9–20. https://doi.org/10.25221/fee.423.3

Matile (1978) Description d'un Neoclastobasis nouveau de Hongrie et remarques sur divers Leiini (Diptera: Mycetophilidae). Folia Entomologica Hungarica 31(1): 167–172.

Milkov FN (1977) Natural Zones of the USSR. Mysl, Moscow, 293 pp. [In Russian]

Montgomery GA, Belitz MW, Guralnick RP, Tingley MW (2021) Standards and Best Practices for Monitoring and Benchmarking Insects. Frontiers in ecology and evolution 8: 579193. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2020.579193

New TR, Samways MJ (2014) Insect conservation in the southern temperate zones: an over view. Austral Entomology 53(1): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12071

Plotnikov IS, Sidorenko VS, Krivokhatsky VA (2013) Zoogeographic analysis of the Palaearctic fauna of Drosophilid flies (Diptera, Drosophilidae) with description of clusterization software for provincial faunas. Entomological review 93: 831–843. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0013873813070051

Prosvirov AS, Egorov LV, Ruchin AB (2024) On the distribution and biology of Elater ferrugineus (Coleoptera: Elateridae) in Russia. Nature Conservation Research 9(3): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2024.020

Roháček J, Ševčík J (2013) Diptera associated with sporocarps of Meripilus giganteus in an urban habitat. Central European Journal of Biology 8: 143–167. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11535-013-0119-z

Ronquist F, Forshage M, Häggqvist S, Karlsson D, Hovmöller R et al. (2020) Completing Linnaeus’s inventory of the Swedish insect fauna: Only 5,000 species left? PLoS ONE 15(3): e0228561. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228561

Rosa AHB, Barbosa EP, Wahlberg N, Freitas AVL (2024) Systematic position and conservation aspects of Melinaea mnasias thera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae: Danainae). Nature Conservation Research 9(1): 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24189/ncr.2024.001

Ruchin AB, Vikhrev NE, Gavryushin DI, Esin MN (2023) List of several families of Diptera from the Volga upland and the Oka-Don lowland. Proceedings of the Mordovia State Nature Reserve 32: 5–67. https://doi.org/10.24412/cl-31646-2686-7117-2023-32-5-67

Ruchin AB, Zeegers T, Esin MN (2021) New species Tachinid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) in the Russian fauna. Russian Entomological Journal 30(2): 196–199. https://doi.org/10.15298/rusentj.30.2.15

Salmela J, Kolcsár LP (2017) New and poorly known Palaearctic fungus gnats (Diptera, Sciaroidea). Biodiversity Data Journal 5: e11760. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.5.e11760

Singh RP, Böttger D, Brehm G (2022) Moth light traps perform better with vanes: A comparison of different designs. Journal of Applied Entomology 146: 1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.13068

Skvarla MJ, Larson JL, Fisher JR, Dowling APG (2021) A Review of Terrestrial and Canopy MTs. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 114(1): 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/saaa044

Yamashkin AA (2012) Geographical atlas of the Republic of Mordovia. Publisher of the Mordovia State University, Saransk, 204 pp. [In Russian]

Yamashkin AA, Silaeva TB, Alba LD, Gagarin YN, Maslyaev VN, Grishutkin GF (2000) Mordovian National Park "Smolny". Mordovia State University, Saransk, 88 pp. [In Russian]

Zaitzev AI (1994) Fungus Gnats of the Fauna of Russia and Adjacent Regions. Part I. Nauka, Moscow, 288 pp. [In Russian]

Zaitzev AI (1999) New species of fungus gnats (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) from Russia and Ukraine. Dipterological Research 10(2): 97–100.

Zaitzev AI (2003) Fungus Gnats (Diptera: Sciaroidea) of the fauna of Russia and adjacent regions. Part II. International Journal of Dipterological Research 14(2–4): 77–386.

Zeegers T, Ruchin AB, Esin MN (2023) New species of tachinid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) from Russia, mostly from Republic of Mordovia. Euroasian Entomological Journal 22(2): 85–94. https://doi.org/10.15298/euroasentj.22.02.06

Zeegers T, Lutovinovas E, Ruchin AB, Esin MN (2024) Checklist of the tachinid flies (Diptera: Tachinidae) of the Republic of Mordovia (Russia) including state protected areas. Caucasian Entomological Bulletin V 20(1): 97–106. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10926882