Keywords
ecotope
biotope
phytoindication
ecomorphs
tsenomorfy
contin- structuralism
biotope
phytoindication
ecomorphs
tsenomorfy
contin- structuralism
How to Cite
Zhukov, A. V. (2018). Interpretation of the plants ceonomorphes from the South-East of Ukraine in terms of phyto-indicative scales. Acta Biologica Sibirica, 4(4), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.444877
Abstract
The article shows the discrete nature of the plants ceonomorphes on an example of flora of the southeast of Ukraine. Using discriminant analysis shows that ceonomorphes are discrete classes of plant species which are isolated between themselves to a greater extent than it can be assumed on the basis of only the continuum nature of the ecological differences between species. The predictors used in the discriminant analysis are diapason Didukh’s phytoindicator scales and rescaled Ellenberg scales. The high level of discrimination ability of the model built on the basis of continual predictors shows a considerable species specificity within individual ceonomorphes. The ecomorphic analysis of the ceonomorphes is presented. The aridants as a new ceonomorph is proposed. The reason of the the ceonomorphes compact configuration is a coadaptation of the plant species within each ceonomorphes, as well as in the transforming influence on the environment of the plant community. Using the method of tree classification the rules for the ceonomorphes identification are searched based on the allocation ceonomorphes within phytoindication scales. Phytoindication scales suggested to consider as biotope markers and ceonomorphes suggested to consider as ecotope markers.
References
Apostolov, L. G. (1981). Pest entomofauna of the forest biocenosis of Central Dnieper. Kyiv: Vyshcha Shkola (in Russian).
Baranovskiy, B. А. (2017). Differentiation of new coenomorph in context of the Belgard’s ecomorph system development. Ecology and Noospherology, 28 (1–2), 28–35.
Baranovskiy, B. O., Manyuk, V. V., Іvanko, I. A., Karmizova, L. O. (2017). Flora analysis of the national natural park "Orіlskij". Dnipro: Lіra, (in Ukranian).
Barsov, V.A. (2001). Assessment of the current state of the Papilionoidea butterflies of the Dnieper-Orilsky Reserve. Reserve business in Ukraine, 7 (1), 39-43.
Belgard, A.L., (1950). Forest vegetation of South–Eeast part of the USSR. Kiev: Kiev State University (in Russian).
Chytrý M., Tichý L., Dřevojan P., Sádlo J. & Zelený D. (2018). Ellenberg-type indicator values for the Czech flora. Preslia, 90, 83–103
Clifford, N. J., Harmar, O. P., Harvey, G. & Petts G. E. (2006). Physical habitat, eco- hydraulics and river design: a review and re- evaluation of some popular concepts and methods. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 389–408.
Dahl, F. (1908). Grundsaetze und grundbegriffe der biocoenotischen forshung. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 33, 349–353.
Didukh, Ya.P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre.
Diekmann, M., (1995). Use and improvement of Ellenberg’s indicator values in deciduous forests of the Boreonemoral zone in Sweden. Ecography, 18 (2), 178–189.
Drogunova, M.S., Nazarenko, N.N. (2017). Coenomorphs of Tambov province flora and biotopes’ phytoindication. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 22 (5), 780-786. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-5-780-786 (In Russian, Abstr. in Engl.).
Ellenberg, H. (1974). Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta geobotanica. Göttingen, 9, 197.
Ellenberg, H., (1979). Zeigerwerte der Gefisspflanzen Mitteleuropas. 2nd ed. Scripta Geobotanica, 9, G6ttingen, 122.
Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., Paulissen, D. (1992). Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica, 18.
Fedorov, L.V., Kupatadze, G.A., Kuranova, N.G., Viktorov, V.P. (2017). Classification of urban edafotops in connection with the study of sinantropy (for example, the town of Orekhovo-Zuevo). Socio-environmental technology, 1, 52–64 (in Russian).
Hubbell, S. P. (2005). Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Functional Ecology, 19, 166–172.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1965). The niche: an abstractly inhabited hypervolume. The ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press.
Jowett, I. G. (1993). A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27, 241–248.
Karatzoglou, A. (2004). Kernlab – An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R. A. Karatzoglou, A. Smola, K. Hornik, A. Zeileis. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(9), 1–20.
Kunah, O. N., Prokopenko, E. V., Zhukov, A. V. (2014). Ecomorphic organisation of the ukraine steppe zone spider community. Gruntoznavstvo, 15(1–2), 101–119 (in Russian).
Matveev, N.M. (2011). Professor A. L. Belgard’s fundamentals of Forest Steppe science and their modern interpretation. Samara: Samara University.
Matveyev, N. M. (2001). Quantitative estimates of ecomorphic composition of plantations in the steppe zone. The problems of the sustainability of forest ecosystems. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk University Press, 118-122 (in Russian).
Matveyev, N. M. (2003). The optimization of the Belgard plants ecomorphes system ecotop and biotop phytoindication. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 2 (11), 105–113 (in Russian).
Möbius, K. (2000). The Oyster bank is a biocönose, or a social community. In D. R. Keller & F. B. Golley (Eds.), The Phylosophy of ecology(From science to synthesis, pp. 111–114). Athens, Georgia, USA: University of Georgia Press.
Naveh, Z. & Lieberman A.S. (1994). Landscape Ecology: Theory and application, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag. New York.
Nazarenko, N.N. (2016). Coenomorphs as phytometers of biotopes. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 24(1), 8–14. doi:10.15421/011602
Nazarenko, N.N. (2016). Coenomorphs of south Ural steppe flora (basing on the example of Chelyabinsk region). Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 21 (5), 1889–1896. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2016-21-5-1889-1896 (In Russian, Abstr. in Engl.).
Nazarenko, N. N., Didur, O. A. (2012). Cenomorphes of the natural deciduous forests of the Northern steppes of Ukraine. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 20 (1), 66–77 (in Russian).
Newson, M. D. & Newson C. L. (2000). Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin- scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography, 24, 195–217.
Padmore, C. L. (1998). The role of physical biotopes in determining the conservation status and flow requirements of British rivers. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 1, 25–35.
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Ramenskiy, L.G., Tsatsenkin, I.A., Chizhikov, O.N., Antipin, N.A. (1956). Ecological evaluation of the fodder lands by vegetation cover. Moscow. Sel'khozgiz (in Russian).
Ramensky, L. G. (1938). Introduction to integrated soil-geobotanical study lands. Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo kolkhoz and sovkhoznaya literature "Selhozgiz" (in Russian).
Razumovsky, O.S. (2003). Adaptacionizm and behavioural science in the context of the problems of evolution and meaning of life activity. Polignozis, 2 (22), (in Russian)
Shennikov, A. P. (1941). Meadow-Science. Leningrad (in Russian).
Sørensen, T. (1936). Some ecosystemtical characteristics determined by Raunkiær's circling method. In "To designate the fundamental unit of ecological plant sociology I propose the term ecotope, viz. the field delimited as an object of investigation within a given ecosystem (Tansley)". Nordiska (19. skandinaviska) naturforskarmöteti Helsingfors den 11-15 Augusti 1936, 474-475.
Sukachev, V. N. (1942). The idea of the development in phitocenology. Soviet Botany, 1–3, 5–17 (in Russian).
Sukachev, V. N. (1965). Major contemporary issues of the biocenology. Biology Bulletin, 26 (3), 249–260 (in Russian).
Sukachov, V. N. (1964). The main concepts of the forest biogeoceonology. Moscow. Nauka (in Russian).
Tansley, A.G. (1939). The British Isles and their vegetation. Cambridge University Press.
Tarasov, V.V., (2012). Dnipropetrovsk an Zaporozhie regions flora. Second ed. Lira, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukranian).
Townsend, C. R., & Hildrew A. G. (1994). Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology, 31, 265–275.
Tsyganov, D.N. (1983). Phytoindication of ecological factors in the subzone of mixed coniferous–broad–leafed forests. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Vysotsky, G. N. (1925). Cover science. Minsk, Leningrad: Main Botanical Garden (in Russian).
Zhirkov, I.A. (2017). Bio-Geography, general and specialty. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press (in Russian).
Zhukov O.V, Kunah O. M., Dubinina Y.Y., Novikova V. O. (2018). The role of edaphic, vegetational and spatial factors in the structuring of communities of soil animals in the forest in the flood plain of the Dnipro river. Folia Oecologica, 45, 8–23. doi: 10.2478/foecol-2018-0002
Zhukov, A.V, Zadorozhnaya, G.A. (2016). Ecomorphes of the sod-lithogenic soils on reddish-brown clays. Issues of steppe forestry and forest eclamation of soils, 45, 91–103.
Zhukov, A.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., Ganzha, D.S. (2016). Phytoindication estimation of soil mesopedobionts communities catena and their ecomorphic organization. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 91–117 (in Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/201676
Zhukov, O. V., (2009). The ecomorphic analysis of the soil animals consortia. Dnipropetrovsk: Svidler press (in Ukranian).
Baranovskiy, B. А. (2017). Differentiation of new coenomorph in context of the Belgard’s ecomorph system development. Ecology and Noospherology, 28 (1–2), 28–35.
Baranovskiy, B. O., Manyuk, V. V., Іvanko, I. A., Karmizova, L. O. (2017). Flora analysis of the national natural park "Orіlskij". Dnipro: Lіra, (in Ukranian).
Barsov, V.A. (2001). Assessment of the current state of the Papilionoidea butterflies of the Dnieper-Orilsky Reserve. Reserve business in Ukraine, 7 (1), 39-43.
Belgard, A.L., (1950). Forest vegetation of South–Eeast part of the USSR. Kiev: Kiev State University (in Russian).
Chytrý M., Tichý L., Dřevojan P., Sádlo J. & Zelený D. (2018). Ellenberg-type indicator values for the Czech flora. Preslia, 90, 83–103
Clifford, N. J., Harmar, O. P., Harvey, G. & Petts G. E. (2006). Physical habitat, eco- hydraulics and river design: a review and re- evaluation of some popular concepts and methods. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 16, 389–408.
Dahl, F. (1908). Grundsaetze und grundbegriffe der biocoenotischen forshung. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 33, 349–353.
Didukh, Ya.P. (2011). The ecological scales for the species of Ukrainian flora and their use in synphytoindication. Kyiv: Phytosociocentre.
Diekmann, M., (1995). Use and improvement of Ellenberg’s indicator values in deciduous forests of the Boreonemoral zone in Sweden. Ecography, 18 (2), 178–189.
Drogunova, M.S., Nazarenko, N.N. (2017). Coenomorphs of Tambov province flora and biotopes’ phytoindication. Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 22 (5), 780-786. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2017-22-5-780-786 (In Russian, Abstr. in Engl.).
Ellenberg, H. (1974). Zeigerwerte der Gefässpflanzen Mitteleuropas. Scripta geobotanica. Göttingen, 9, 197.
Ellenberg, H., (1979). Zeigerwerte der Gefisspflanzen Mitteleuropas. 2nd ed. Scripta Geobotanica, 9, G6ttingen, 122.
Ellenberg, H., Weber, H.E., Dull, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W., Paulissen, D. (1992). Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica, 18.
Fedorov, L.V., Kupatadze, G.A., Kuranova, N.G., Viktorov, V.P. (2017). Classification of urban edafotops in connection with the study of sinantropy (for example, the town of Orekhovo-Zuevo). Socio-environmental technology, 1, 52–64 (in Russian).
Hubbell, S. P. (2005). Neutral theory in community ecology and the hypothesis of functional equivalence. Functional Ecology, 19, 166–172.
Hutchinson, G. E. (1965). The niche: an abstractly inhabited hypervolume. The ecological theatre and the evolutionary play. New Haven, Yale Univ. Press.
Jowett, I. G. (1993). A method for objectively identifying pool, run, and riffle habitats from physical measurements. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 27, 241–248.
Karatzoglou, A. (2004). Kernlab – An S4 Package for Kernel Methods in R. A. Karatzoglou, A. Smola, K. Hornik, A. Zeileis. Journal of Statistical Software, 11(9), 1–20.
Kunah, O. N., Prokopenko, E. V., Zhukov, A. V. (2014). Ecomorphic organisation of the ukraine steppe zone spider community. Gruntoznavstvo, 15(1–2), 101–119 (in Russian).
Matveev, N.M. (2011). Professor A. L. Belgard’s fundamentals of Forest Steppe science and their modern interpretation. Samara: Samara University.
Matveyev, N. M. (2001). Quantitative estimates of ecomorphic composition of plantations in the steppe zone. The problems of the sustainability of forest ecosystems. Ulyanovsk: Ulyanovsk University Press, 118-122 (in Russian).
Matveyev, N. M. (2003). The optimization of the Belgard plants ecomorphes system ecotop and biotop phytoindication. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 2 (11), 105–113 (in Russian).
Möbius, K. (2000). The Oyster bank is a biocönose, or a social community. In D. R. Keller & F. B. Golley (Eds.), The Phylosophy of ecology(From science to synthesis, pp. 111–114). Athens, Georgia, USA: University of Georgia Press.
Naveh, Z. & Lieberman A.S. (1994). Landscape Ecology: Theory and application, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag. New York.
Nazarenko, N.N. (2016). Coenomorphs as phytometers of biotopes. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology. 24(1), 8–14. doi:10.15421/011602
Nazarenko, N.N. (2016). Coenomorphs of south Ural steppe flora (basing on the example of Chelyabinsk region). Tambov University Reports. Series: Natural and Technical Sciences, 21 (5), 1889–1896. DOI: 10.20310/1810-0198-2016-21-5-1889-1896 (In Russian, Abstr. in Engl.).
Nazarenko, N. N., Didur, O. A. (2012). Cenomorphes of the natural deciduous forests of the Northern steppes of Ukraine. Visnyk of Dnipropetrovsk University. Biology, ecology, 20 (1), 66–77 (in Russian).
Newson, M. D. & Newson C. L. (2000). Geomorphology, ecology and river channel habitat: mesoscale approaches to basin- scale challenges. Progress in Physical Geography, 24, 195–217.
Padmore, C. L. (1998). The role of physical biotopes in determining the conservation status and flow requirements of British rivers. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management, 1, 25–35.
R Core Team (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Ramenskiy, L.G., Tsatsenkin, I.A., Chizhikov, O.N., Antipin, N.A. (1956). Ecological evaluation of the fodder lands by vegetation cover. Moscow. Sel'khozgiz (in Russian).
Ramensky, L. G. (1938). Introduction to integrated soil-geobotanical study lands. Gosudarstvennoe izdatelstvo kolkhoz and sovkhoznaya literature "Selhozgiz" (in Russian).
Razumovsky, O.S. (2003). Adaptacionizm and behavioural science in the context of the problems of evolution and meaning of life activity. Polignozis, 2 (22), (in Russian)
Shennikov, A. P. (1941). Meadow-Science. Leningrad (in Russian).
Sørensen, T. (1936). Some ecosystemtical characteristics determined by Raunkiær's circling method. In "To designate the fundamental unit of ecological plant sociology I propose the term ecotope, viz. the field delimited as an object of investigation within a given ecosystem (Tansley)". Nordiska (19. skandinaviska) naturforskarmöteti Helsingfors den 11-15 Augusti 1936, 474-475.
Sukachev, V. N. (1942). The idea of the development in phitocenology. Soviet Botany, 1–3, 5–17 (in Russian).
Sukachev, V. N. (1965). Major contemporary issues of the biocenology. Biology Bulletin, 26 (3), 249–260 (in Russian).
Sukachov, V. N. (1964). The main concepts of the forest biogeoceonology. Moscow. Nauka (in Russian).
Tansley, A.G. (1939). The British Isles and their vegetation. Cambridge University Press.
Tarasov, V.V., (2012). Dnipropetrovsk an Zaporozhie regions flora. Second ed. Lira, Dnipropetrovsk (in Ukranian).
Townsend, C. R., & Hildrew A. G. (1994). Species traits in relation to a habitat templet for river systems. Freshwater Biology, 31, 265–275.
Tsyganov, D.N. (1983). Phytoindication of ecological factors in the subzone of mixed coniferous–broad–leafed forests. Moscow: Nauka (in Russian).
Vysotsky, G. N. (1925). Cover science. Minsk, Leningrad: Main Botanical Garden (in Russian).
Zhirkov, I.A. (2017). Bio-Geography, general and specialty. Moscow: KMK Scientific Press (in Russian).
Zhukov O.V, Kunah O. M., Dubinina Y.Y., Novikova V. O. (2018). The role of edaphic, vegetational and spatial factors in the structuring of communities of soil animals in the forest in the flood plain of the Dnipro river. Folia Oecologica, 45, 8–23. doi: 10.2478/foecol-2018-0002
Zhukov, A.V, Zadorozhnaya, G.A. (2016). Ecomorphes of the sod-lithogenic soils on reddish-brown clays. Issues of steppe forestry and forest eclamation of soils, 45, 91–103.
Zhukov, A.V., Kunah, O.N., Novikova, V.A., Ganzha, D.S. (2016). Phytoindication estimation of soil mesopedobionts communities catena and their ecomorphic organization. Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (3), 91–117 (in Russian). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/201676
Zhukov, O. V., (2009). The ecomorphic analysis of the soil animals consortia. Dnipropetrovsk: Svidler press (in Ukranian).
Acta Biologica Sibirica is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
ABS allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...