PRACTICES OF CIVIC PARTICIPATION IN THE IMPROVEMENT AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE URBAN ENVIRONMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract
The article presents a study of the issues of citizens ' participation in the development of urban areas, creating a comfortable environment for life on the example of Vologda. The research is based on the following methods: multiple case study, included observation, unstructured interviews, and content analysis. When studying a separate case, we identified the participants in the interaction, the nature of the interaction (open dialogue, pseudo-communication, conflict), the tools of civil participation, and the results obtained. The main problem of realizing the potential of civil participation in municipal management is the unformed motivation of people to social activity. It is concluded that in the context of a conflict of interests, the participating project looks like a marginal protest movement in the eyes of the local authorities. The fact that the urban environment will be in demand and works better if residents are actively involved in its creation and management, justifies the need for a dialogue between the government and the population. It is possible to avoid a city-protection conflict by involving citizens in participation at the first stages of designing changes to public spaces.
Downloads
Metrics
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Бойкова М.В., Ильина И.Н., Салазкин М.Г. Будущее городов: города как агенты глобализации и инноваций. Форсайт, 2011, 5(4), 32–48.
Горнова Г.В. Соразмерность города и человека: категорический императив градостроительства. Вестник Омского государственного педагогического университета. Гуманитарные исследования, 2016, 2(11), 22–25.
Деменев А.Г., Шубина Т.Ф., Шубина П.В., Ненашева М.В., Макулин А.В., Тарасов И.А. Опыт общественного участия в планировании комфортной городской среды на примере Архангельской области. Арктика и Север, 2018, 33, 91–116. doi: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.33.91
Дмитриева Н.Н., Ипатова Т.М. Формирование комфортной городской среды как стратегическое направление развития проекта «ЖКХ и городская среда». Социально-экономическое управление: теория и практика. Ижевский государственный технический университет им. М.Т. Калашникова, 2018, 1(32), 95–98.
Кияненко К.В. Генри Санофф: к архитектуре, озабоченной человеком. О проектировании людей, с людьми и для людей. Архитектурный вестник, 2010, 1, 112–121.
Климова С.Г., Щербакова И.В. Опыт изучения территориального контекста гражданского участия. Мониторинг общественного мнения: экономические и социальные перемены, 2015, 3, 12–27.
Мерзляков А.А. Гражданское социальное участие как универсальная технология социального управления (на материалах разработки и реализации градостроительных проектов): автореферат дис. … канд. соц. наук. М., 2007.
Тычинская Т.А. Либеральная концепция демократического государства Дж. Ст. Милля (по книге «Размышления о представительном правлении». СПб. , 1863 г.). Вестник Брянского государственного университета, 2012. 2 (1), 92–96.
Arnstein S. R. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35 (4), 216–224.
Insa-Ciriza R. Two Ways of New Towns Development: A Tale of Two Cities. In Urban Development /Ed. by Dr. Serafeim Polyzos. InTeh Publ., 2012. doi: 10.5772/37906
Pateman C. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Sanoff H. Multiple Views of Participatory Design. International Journal of Architectural Research, 2008, 2 (1), 57–69.
Yin R. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Ser.,1994, 5, 93–101.
REFERENCES
Arnstein, S.R. (1969). A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol. 35 (4), 216–224.
Babintsev, V.P., Shapoval, Zh.A. (2018). Publichnye kommunikatsii vlasti i obshchestva v regione: problemy i vozmozhnosti konstruktivnykh izmeneniy [Public communications of authorities and society in the region: problems and opportunities for constructive changes]. The Authority, 2018, no 4, 7–15.
Boykova, M.V., Il'ina, I.N., Salazkin, M.G. (2011). Budushchee gorodov: goroda kak agenty globalizatsii i innovatsiy [The future of cities: cities as agents of globalization and innovation]. Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 5, no 4, 32–48.
Demenev, A.G., et al. (2018). Opyt obshchestvennogo uchastiya v planirovanii komfortnoj gorodskoj sredy na primere Arhangel'skoj oblasti [Public participation in planning a comfortable urban environment: case of the Arkhangelsk region]. Arctic and North, no 33,91–117. DOI: 10.17238/issn2221-2698.2018.33.91
Dmitrieva, N.N., Ipatova, T.M. (2018). Formirovanie komfortnoy gorodskoy sredy kak strategicheskoe napravlenie razvitiya proekta «ZhKKh i gorodskaya sreda» [Formation of a comfortable urban environment as a strategic direction of development of the project "Housing and communal services and urban environment»]. Socio-economic management: theory and practice, no 1 (32), 95–98.
Gornova, G.V. (2016). Sorazmernost' goroda i cheloveka: kategoricheskij imperativ gradostroitel'stva [Harmony between the city and the man: categorical imperative of urban development]. Newsletter of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian research, no 2(11), 22–25.
Insa-Ciriza, R. (2012). Two Ways of New Towns Development: A Tale of Two Cities. In Urban Development /Ed. by Dr. Serafeim Polyzos. InTeh Publ. doi: 10.5772/37906
Kiyanenko, K.V. (2010). Genri Sanoff: k arhitekture, ozabochennoj chelovekom. O proektirovanii lyudej, s lyud'mi i dlya lyudej Henry Sanoff: to architecture concerned with man. On the design of the people, by the people and for the people. Architectural Bulletin, 1, 112–121.
Klimova, S.G., Shcherbakova, I.V. (2015). Opyt izucheniya territorial'nogo konteksta grazhdanskogo uchastiya [Experience in studying the territorial context of civic participation]. Monitoring of public opinion: economic and social changes, no 3, 12–27.
Merzlyakov, A.A. (2007). Grazhdanskoe social'noe uchastie kak universal'naya tekhnologiya social'nogo upravleniya (na materialah razrabotki i realizacii gradostroitel'nyh proektov) [Civil social participation as a universal technology of social management (based on the materials of development and implementation of urban development projects)]: avtoreferat dis. … kand. soc. nauk. M.
Pateman C. (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge University Press, 1970.
Sanoff, H. (2008). Multiple Views of Participatory Design. International Journal of Architectural Research. 2 (1), 57–69.
Tychinsky, T.A. (2012). Liberal'naya koncepciya demokraticheskogo gosudarstva Dzh. St. Millya (po knige «Razmyshleniya o predstavitel'nom pravlenii». SPb. 1863 g.) [The Liberal concept of J. S. MILL'S democratic state (on the book Considerations on representative government. St. Petersburg, 1863)]. Bulletin of the Bryansk state University, 2 (1), 92–96.
Yin, R. (1994). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Ser.,1994, no 5, 93–101.