DYNAMICS OF DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE NON-PROFIT SECTOR IN THE THREE SIBERIAN REGIONS (BASED ON EXPERT EVALUATIONS)
Article Sidebar
Published:
Aug 27, 2020
Keywords:
civil society, the non-profit sector, state-public partnership, expert evaluations, Siberian regions, structural equation modeling
Main Article Content
Daria A. Omelchenko
Email: daria.omelchenko@mail.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2839-5070
Svetlana G. Maximova
Email: svet-maximova@yandex.ru
Oksana E. Noyanzina
Email: noe@list.ru
Abstract
Contemporary Russian social policy is marked by intensive development of state-public partnership as an important instrument for identifying and responding to social issues, improving quality of social services, protecting rights and freedoms of the Russian citizens. Shouldering some of the state functions on the provision of social services, organization of socially significant events and activities, NPOs are often more efficient and effective, they react faster on social needs and provide population with opportunities to participate in resolution of their problems and change their lives for the better way. The analysis of dynamic characteristics of civil society, fulfilled by the authors on the base of expert evaluations in the three border regions of the Siberian federal district (the Altai region, the Novosibirsk oblast, the Republic of Altai, n = 180), allowed to reveal their structure and relationships with peculiarities of the functioning and interaction with other NPOs and governmental bodies at different levels. Our findings suggest that processes in civil society are strongly interconnected, and that the assessment of their actual state and dynamics is very subjective, affected by professional experience and peculiarities of expert organization.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Omelchenko, D. A., Maximova, S. G., & Noyanzina, O. E. (2020). DYNAMICS OF DEVELOPMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY AND THE NON-PROFIT SECTOR IN THE THREE SIBERIAN REGIONS (BASED ON EXPERT EVALUATIONS). Society and Security Insights, 3(3), 13-34. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2020)3-01
Section
SECURITY AND INTEGRATION IN COUNTRIES OF ASIAN REGION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Голенкова З.Т. Гражданское общество в России. Социологические исследования, 1997, No. 3, 25–36.
Доклад о состоянии гражданского общества в Российской Федерации за 2018 год. М.: Общественная палата Российской Федерации, 2018. URL: https://www.oprf.ru/files/1_2019dok/Doklad_OPRF_2018.pdf (дата обращения: 1.06.2020).
Зуденкова С.А. Состояние социально-гражданских позиций населения как фактор взаимодействия с органами муниципальной власти. Вестник университета, 2014, No. 16, 116–119.
Ильин В.А. Развитие гражданского общества в России в условиях «капитализма для избранных». Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз, 2017, 4 (52), 9-40.
Информационно-аналитический бюллетень о развитии гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора в России, 2019, 1(16). Центр исследований гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора: 10 лет на передовых рубежах науки о гражданском обществе. URL: https://grans.hse.ru/data/2019/09/08/1537476714/Bulleten%2016_small.pdf (дата обращения: 1.06.2020).
Кирдина С.Г. Гражданское общество: уход от идеологемы. Социологические исследования, 2012, No. 2, 63-73.
Ланг С., Хэртель А., Бюрш М. Гражданское общество и гражданская активность в России. Фонд Фридриха Эберта, 2010.
Максимова С.Г., Омельченко Д.А., Ноянзина О.Е., Суртаева О.В. Гражданские практики и базовые модели участия населения в общественной жизни в современном сибирском регионе. Society and Security Insights, 2019, 2 (3), 13-50. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)3-6360
Петухов В.В. Политическая активность и гражданская самоорганизация россиян. Общественные науки и современность, 2002, No. 6, 59–65.
Римский В.Л. Политическая и общественная активность российских граждан. Общественные науки и современность, 2007, No. 5, 60–68.
Тимофеев Н.С. Государство, местное самоуправление и гражданское общество: аспекты и пределы взаимодействия. Конституционное и муниципальное право, 2005, No. 9, 2–9.
Трофимова И.Н. Гражданский активизм в современном российском обществе: особенности локализации. Социологические исследования, 2015, No. 4, 72–77.
Уваров А.А. Местное самоуправление и гражданское общество. Конституционное и муниципальное право, 2008, No. 15, 6–9.
Хабермас Ю. Политические функции публичной сферы. В кн: Структурное изменение публичной сферы: исследование относительно категории буржуазного общества. М.: Весь мир, 2016. С. 112–137.
Boehnke K., Rippl S., Fuss D. Sustainable civil-society engagement: Potentials of a transnational civil society in French-German, Polish-German, and Czech-German border regions. Sustainability, 2015, 7(4), 4078-4099.
Costello A. B., Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 2005, 10 (1), 1–9.
Hayton J. C., Allen D. G., Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 2004, 7 (2), 191-205.
Whaites A. Let's get civil society straight: NGOs and political theory. Development in Practice, 1996, 6(3), 240-249.
Zaleski P. Global non-governmental administrative system: geosociology of the third sector. In: Gawin D., Glinski P. (Eds). Civil Society in the Making. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers, 2006.
REFERENCES
Golenkova, Z.T. (1997). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo v Rossii [Civil society in Russia]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, no. 3, 25–36.
The Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation (2018). Doklad o sostojanii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossijskoj Federacii za 2018 god [Annual report on the state of civil society in the Russian Federation]. Moscow. URL: https://www.oprf.ru/files/1_2019dok/Doklad_OPRF_2018.pdf (accessed 1 June 2020).
Zudenkova, S.A. (2014). Sostojanie social'no-grazhdanskih pozicij naselenija kak faktor vzaimodejstvija s organami municipal'noj vlasti [The status of social and civil positions of the population as a factor in the interaction with municipal authority]. Vestnik universiteta, no. 16, 116–119.
Il'in, V.A. (2017). Razvitie grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossii v uslovijah «kapitalizma dlja izbrannyh» [Development of civil society in Russia in conditions of «capitalism for the few»]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 4 (52), 9–40.
Informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten' o razvitii grazhdanskogo obshhestva i nekommercheskogo sektora v Rossii, 1(16), ijul' 2019 [Informational and analythical bulletin on the development of civil society and third sector in Russia]. Centr issledovanij grazhdanskogo obshhestva i nekommercheskogo sektora: 10 let na peredovyh rubezhah nauki o grazhdanskom obshhestve [The Center for Studies of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector]. URL: https://grans.hse.ru/data/2019/09/08/1537476714/Bulleten%2016_small.pdf (accessed 1 June 2020).
Kirdina, S.G. (2012). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: uhod ot ideologemy [Civil society: escape from ideologeme]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, no. 2, 63-73.
Lang, S., Hjertel', A., & Bjursh, M. (2010). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo i grazhdanskaja aktivnost' v Rossii [Civil society and civic activity in Russia]. Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Maximova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A., Noyanzina, O. E., Surtaeva, O. V. (2019). Citizenship practices and basic models of participation in public life in contemporary Siberian region. Society and Security Insights, 2 (3), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)3-6360
Petuhov, V.V. (2002). Politicheskaja aktivnost' i grazhdanskaja samoorganizacija rossijan [Political activity and civic self-organization of Russians]. Social sciences and contemporary world, no. 6, 59–65.
Rimskij, V.L. (2007). Politicheskaja i obshhestvennaja aktivnost' rossijskih grazhdan [Political and public activity of the Russian citizens]. Social sciences and contemporary world, no. 5, 60-68.
Timofeev, N.S. (2005). Gosudarstvo, mestnoe samoupravlenie i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: aspekty i predely vzaimodejstvija [State, local government and civil society: aspects and limits of interaction]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo, no. 9, 2-9.
Trofimova, I.N. (2015). Grazhdanskij aktivizm v sovremennom rossijskom obshhestve: osobennosti lokalizacii [Civic activism in contemporary Russian society: peculiarities of localization]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, (4), 72-77.
Uvarov, A.A. (2008). Mestnoe samoupravlenie i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo [Local government and civil society]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo, no. 15, 6-9.
Habermas, J. (2016). Politicheskie funkcii publichnoj sfery [Political functions of the public sphere]. In: Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery: issledovanie otnositel'no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshhestva [The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society] (pp. 112–137). Moscow: Ves mir.
Boehnke, K., Rippl, S., & Fuss, D. (2015). Sustainable civil-society engagement: Potentials of a transnational civil society in French-German, Polish-German, and Czech-German border regions. Sustainability, 7(4), 4078-4099.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10 (1), 1–9.
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7 (2), 191-205.
Whaites, A. (1996). Let's get civil society straight: NGOs and political theory. Development in Practice, 6 (3), 240-249.
Zaleski, P. (2006). Global non-governmental administrative system: geosociology of the third sector. In: Gawin D., Glinski P. (Eds). Civil Society in the Making. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.
Доклад о состоянии гражданского общества в Российской Федерации за 2018 год. М.: Общественная палата Российской Федерации, 2018. URL: https://www.oprf.ru/files/1_2019dok/Doklad_OPRF_2018.pdf (дата обращения: 1.06.2020).
Зуденкова С.А. Состояние социально-гражданских позиций населения как фактор взаимодействия с органами муниципальной власти. Вестник университета, 2014, No. 16, 116–119.
Ильин В.А. Развитие гражданского общества в России в условиях «капитализма для избранных». Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз, 2017, 4 (52), 9-40.
Информационно-аналитический бюллетень о развитии гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора в России, 2019, 1(16). Центр исследований гражданского общества и некоммерческого сектора: 10 лет на передовых рубежах науки о гражданском обществе. URL: https://grans.hse.ru/data/2019/09/08/1537476714/Bulleten%2016_small.pdf (дата обращения: 1.06.2020).
Кирдина С.Г. Гражданское общество: уход от идеологемы. Социологические исследования, 2012, No. 2, 63-73.
Ланг С., Хэртель А., Бюрш М. Гражданское общество и гражданская активность в России. Фонд Фридриха Эберта, 2010.
Максимова С.Г., Омельченко Д.А., Ноянзина О.Е., Суртаева О.В. Гражданские практики и базовые модели участия населения в общественной жизни в современном сибирском регионе. Society and Security Insights, 2019, 2 (3), 13-50. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)3-6360
Петухов В.В. Политическая активность и гражданская самоорганизация россиян. Общественные науки и современность, 2002, No. 6, 59–65.
Римский В.Л. Политическая и общественная активность российских граждан. Общественные науки и современность, 2007, No. 5, 60–68.
Тимофеев Н.С. Государство, местное самоуправление и гражданское общество: аспекты и пределы взаимодействия. Конституционное и муниципальное право, 2005, No. 9, 2–9.
Трофимова И.Н. Гражданский активизм в современном российском обществе: особенности локализации. Социологические исследования, 2015, No. 4, 72–77.
Уваров А.А. Местное самоуправление и гражданское общество. Конституционное и муниципальное право, 2008, No. 15, 6–9.
Хабермас Ю. Политические функции публичной сферы. В кн: Структурное изменение публичной сферы: исследование относительно категории буржуазного общества. М.: Весь мир, 2016. С. 112–137.
Boehnke K., Rippl S., Fuss D. Sustainable civil-society engagement: Potentials of a transnational civil society in French-German, Polish-German, and Czech-German border regions. Sustainability, 2015, 7(4), 4078-4099.
Costello A. B., Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 2005, 10 (1), 1–9.
Hayton J. C., Allen D. G., Scarpello V. Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 2004, 7 (2), 191-205.
Whaites A. Let's get civil society straight: NGOs and political theory. Development in Practice, 1996, 6(3), 240-249.
Zaleski P. Global non-governmental administrative system: geosociology of the third sector. In: Gawin D., Glinski P. (Eds). Civil Society in the Making. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers, 2006.
REFERENCES
Golenkova, Z.T. (1997). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo v Rossii [Civil society in Russia]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, no. 3, 25–36.
The Civic Chamber of the Russian Federation (2018). Doklad o sostojanii grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossijskoj Federacii za 2018 god [Annual report on the state of civil society in the Russian Federation]. Moscow. URL: https://www.oprf.ru/files/1_2019dok/Doklad_OPRF_2018.pdf (accessed 1 June 2020).
Zudenkova, S.A. (2014). Sostojanie social'no-grazhdanskih pozicij naselenija kak faktor vzaimodejstvija s organami municipal'noj vlasti [The status of social and civil positions of the population as a factor in the interaction with municipal authority]. Vestnik universiteta, no. 16, 116–119.
Il'in, V.A. (2017). Razvitie grazhdanskogo obshhestva v Rossii v uslovijah «kapitalizma dlja izbrannyh» [Development of civil society in Russia in conditions of «capitalism for the few»]. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 4 (52), 9–40.
Informacionno-analiticheskij bjulleten' o razvitii grazhdanskogo obshhestva i nekommercheskogo sektora v Rossii, 1(16), ijul' 2019 [Informational and analythical bulletin on the development of civil society and third sector in Russia]. Centr issledovanij grazhdanskogo obshhestva i nekommercheskogo sektora: 10 let na peredovyh rubezhah nauki o grazhdanskom obshhestve [The Center for Studies of Civil Society and the Non-Profit Sector]. URL: https://grans.hse.ru/data/2019/09/08/1537476714/Bulleten%2016_small.pdf (accessed 1 June 2020).
Kirdina, S.G. (2012). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: uhod ot ideologemy [Civil society: escape from ideologeme]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, no. 2, 63-73.
Lang, S., Hjertel', A., & Bjursh, M. (2010). Grazhdanskoe obshhestvo i grazhdanskaja aktivnost' v Rossii [Civil society and civic activity in Russia]. Friedrich Ebert Foundation.
Maximova, S. G., Omelchenko, D. A., Noyanzina, O. E., Surtaeva, O. V. (2019). Citizenship practices and basic models of participation in public life in contemporary Siberian region. Society and Security Insights, 2 (3), 13–50. https://doi.org/10.14258/ssi(2019)3-6360
Petuhov, V.V. (2002). Politicheskaja aktivnost' i grazhdanskaja samoorganizacija rossijan [Political activity and civic self-organization of Russians]. Social sciences and contemporary world, no. 6, 59–65.
Rimskij, V.L. (2007). Politicheskaja i obshhestvennaja aktivnost' rossijskih grazhdan [Political and public activity of the Russian citizens]. Social sciences and contemporary world, no. 5, 60-68.
Timofeev, N.S. (2005). Gosudarstvo, mestnoe samoupravlenie i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo: aspekty i predely vzaimodejstvija [State, local government and civil society: aspects and limits of interaction]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo, no. 9, 2-9.
Trofimova, I.N. (2015). Grazhdanskij aktivizm v sovremennom rossijskom obshhestve: osobennosti lokalizacii [Civic activism in contemporary Russian society: peculiarities of localization]. Sociologicheskie issledovanija, (4), 72-77.
Uvarov, A.A. (2008). Mestnoe samoupravlenie i grazhdanskoe obshhestvo [Local government and civil society]. Konstitucionnoe i municipal'noe pravo, no. 15, 6-9.
Habermas, J. (2016). Politicheskie funkcii publichnoj sfery [Political functions of the public sphere]. In: Strukturnoe izmenenie publichnoj sfery: issledovanie otnositel'no kategorii burzhuaznogo obshhestva [The structural transformation of the public sphere: an inquiry into a category of bourgeois society] (pp. 112–137). Moscow: Ves mir.
Boehnke, K., Rippl, S., & Fuss, D. (2015). Sustainable civil-society engagement: Potentials of a transnational civil society in French-German, Polish-German, and Czech-German border regions. Sustainability, 7(4), 4078-4099.
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical assessment, research, and evaluation, 10 (1), 1–9.
Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G., & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational research methods, 7 (2), 191-205.
Whaites, A. (1996). Let's get civil society straight: NGOs and political theory. Development in Practice, 6 (3), 240-249.
Zaleski, P. (2006). Global non-governmental administrative system: geosociology of the third sector. In: Gawin D., Glinski P. (Eds). Civil Society in the Making. Warsaw: IFiS Publishers.