THE POTTERY FROM THE SARGARINSKO-ALEKSEEVSKY BURIAL GROUND OF KARATUGAY
Abstract
The article considers the results of studying the technology of pottery manufacturing at the Sargarinsko-Alekseevsky burial ground of Karatugay (Central Kazakhstan). By the method of A.A. Bobrinsky using a MBS-10 binocular microscope, 10 archaeologically intact and fragmented vessels have been studied. The information has been obtained on the characteristics of the material, the preparation of molding compound recipes, the methods of constructing the beginning and hollow body, surface treatment, and firing conditions. A set of basic pottery traditions has been defined (selection of raw materials – medium-iron plastic clay with a natural admixture of oolitic brown iron ore; molding mass recipe – medium / large wood pulp at a concentration of 1:5 + small medium-iron chamotte at a concentration of 1:5 + manure; capacitive program; constructing a hollow body in a patchwork-lumpy way), imported vessels have been identified, the sequence of burials has been established. It is shown that the population who left the site lived together with representatives of the Irmen culture.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Bobrinskij A.A. Goncharstvo Vostochnoj Evropy. Istochniki i metody izucheniya [Pottery of Eastern Europe. Sources and Methods of Study]. M. : Nauka, 1978. 272 p.
Bobrinskij A.A. Goncharnaja tehnologija kak objekt istoriko-kul’turnogo izuchenija [Pottery Technology as an Object of Historical and Cultural Study]. Aktual’nye problemy izuchenija drevnego goncharstva [Actual Problems of Studying Ancient Pottery]. Samara : Izd-vo SamGPU, 1999. Pp. 5–109.
Kraeva L.A. Sarmatskaja keramika kak istoricheskij istochnik [Sarmatian Ceramics as a Historical Source]. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniju drevnej keramiki v arheologii [Modern Approaches to the Study of Ancient Ceramics in Archaeology]. M. : IA RAN, 2015. Pp. 229–242.
Loman V.G. O nekotoryh tradicijah goncharov Central’nogo Kazahstana v konce epohi bronzy [On Some Traditions of Potters of Central Kazakhstan at the End of the Bronze Age]. Drevnie kul’tury Severnogo Kitaja, Mongolii i Bajkal’skoj Sibiri [Ancient Cultures of Northern China, Mongolia and Baikal Siberia]. Beijing : Science Press, 2015a. T. 1. Pp. 189–195.
Loman V.G. Privoznaja keramika na poselenii Kent [Imported Ceramics at the Kent Settlement]. Samarskij nauchnyj vestnik [Samara Scientific Herald]. 2015b. No 4 (13). Pp. 71–79.
Loman V.G. K voprosu o genezise i sostave naselenija sargarinsko-alekseevskoj kul’tury (po dannym tehniko-tehnologicheskogo analiza keramiki) [On the Question of the Genesis and Composition of the Population of the Sargary-Alekseev Culture (According to the Data of the Technical and Technological Analysis of Ceramics)]. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniju drevnej keramiki v arheologii [Modern Approaches to the Study of Ancient Ceramics in Archaeology]. M. : IA RAN, 2015v. Pp. 243–247.
Loman V.G. Karatugaj – mogil’nik finala epohi bronzy [Karatugai – the Burial Ground of the Final Bronze Age]. Teorija i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2019. No 2 (26). Pp. 131–152.
Molodin V.I. Baraba v epohu bronzy [Baraba in the Bronze Age]. Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1985. 200 p. Myl’nikova L.N. Tehnologicheskie osobennosti izgotovlenija keramiki poselenija Myl’nikovo (Prilozhenie 1) [Technological Features of the Manufacture of Ceramics of the Mylnikovo Settlement (Appendix 1)]. Papin D.V, Shamshin A.B. Barnaul’skoe Priob’e v perehodnoe vremja ot epohi bronzy k rannemu zheleznomu veku [Barnaul Priobye in Transitional Time from the Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age]. Barnaul : Izd-vo Alt. un-ta, 2005. Pp. 85–126.
Papin D.V., Loman V.G., Stepanova N.F, Fedoruk A.S. Rezul’taty tehniko-tehnologicheskogo analiza keramicheskogo kompleksa poselenija epohi pozdnej bronzy Rublevo-VI [The Results of the Technical and Technological Analysis of the Ceramic Complex of the Settlement of the Late Bronze Age of Rublevo-VI]. Teorija i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2015. No 2 (12). Pp. 115–143.
Papin D.V., Fedoruk A.S., Loman V.G., Stepanova N.F. Keramicheskij kompleks epohi pozdnej bronzy poselenija Zharkovo-3 [Ceramic Complex of the Late Bronze Age of the Zharkovo-3 Settlement]. Teorija i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2016. No 3 (15). Pp. 102–125.
Papin, D.V. Stepanova N.F., Fedoruk A.S. Keramika jepohi pozdnej bronzy stepnogo Ob’-Irtyshskogo mezhdurech’ja kak istochnik dlja rekonstrukcii processov jetnokul’turnogo vzaimodejstvija [Ceramics of the Late Bronze Age of the Steppe Ob-Irtysh Interfluve as a Source for the Reconstruction of the Processes of Ethno-Cultural Interaction]. Vestnik arheologii, antropologii i etnografii [Bulletin of Archaeology, Anthropology and Ethnography]. 2018. No 3 (42). Pp. 19–31.
Salugina N.P. Rezul’taty tehniko-tehnologicheskogo analiza keramiki iz kurgannogo mogil’nika Bogoljubovka [The Results of the Technical and Technological Analysis of Ceramics from the Burial Mound]. Bogoljubovskij kurgannyj mogil’nik srubnoj kul’tury v Orenburgskoj oblasti [Bogolyubovsky Burial Mound of Srubnaya Culture in the Orenburg Region]. Orenburg : Izd-vo OGPU, 2014. Pp. 131–159.
Salugina N.P. Social’no-kul’turnaja interpretacija tehnologii izgotovlenija keramiki pozdnego bronzovogo veka Volgo-Ural’ja (po materialam srubnoj kul’tury) [Socio-Cultural Interpretation of the Technology of Making the Late Bronze Age Ceramics of the Volga-Ural Region (According to the Materials of the Srubnaya Culture)]. Sovremennye podhody k izucheniju drevnej keramiki v arheologii [Modern Approaches to the Study of Ancient Ceramics in Archaeology]. M. : IA RAN, 2015. Pp. 133–141
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
2.jpg)
