STONE TOOLS FROM THE CIRCULAR-PLAN BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT OF ULAK‑1 (SOUTHERN URALS, RUSSIA)

  • I.I. Bakhshiev Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences Email: ibahsh@gmail.com
  • M.M. Rumiantsev Ufa Federal Research Center Russian Academy of Sciences Email: rmm121983@mail.ru
  • E.V. Bersenev Ufa Federal Research Center Russian Academy of Sciences Email: egor215@bk.ru
DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2025)37(4).-03
Keywords: Bronze Age, Southern Urals, Ulak‑1, stone tools, use-wear analysis

Abstract

The article presents the results of a study of stone tools from the 2015 excavation of the circular Bronze Age settlement Ulak‑1 in the Bashkir Trans-Urals. The primary research method employed was use-wear analysis of the stone tool assemblage. Examination of the wear traces indicates that most of the artifacts were used as tools for crushing and grinding mineral raw materials. It has been established that the stone implements served both for producing coarse fractions and for grinding rock to a powder-like state. The most plausible interpretation is that the majority of the tools were associated with ceramic production, particularly with the preparation of crushed stone temper used as an additive in forming clay masses. The 2015 assemblage also includes flakes and a massive core, whose technical and morphological characteristics are comparable to the Lower Paleolithic stone industry of the Southern Urals.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

I.I. Bakhshiev, Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

Candidate of Historical Sciences, Acting Director of the R. G. Kuzeev Institute of Ethnological Studies of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

M.M. Rumiantsev, Ufa Federal Research Center Russian Academy of Sciences

Researcher at the Institute of History, Language and Literature of the Ufa Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences

E.V. Bersenev, Ufa Federal Research Center Russian Academy of Sciences

Researcher at the R.G. Kuzeev Institute for Ethnological Studies, Subdivision of the Ufa Federal Research Centre of the Russian Academy of Sciences

References

Bakhshiev I.I., Nasretdinov R.R. Some Results of Research Conducted in 2015–2016 at the Ulak‑1 Settlement in the Bashkir Trans-Urals Region. In: Historical and Cultural Processes in the Southern Urals during the Late Bronze Age: Contemporary Issues of Studying and Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Ufa : Dialog, 2016. Pp. 64–87. (In Russ)

Bakhshiev I.I., Noskevich V.V., Nasretdinov R.R. Geophysical and Remote Studies of the Ulak‑1 Fortified Settlement of the Bronze Age in Bashkir Trans-Urals: The Correlation of the Obtained Data with the Results of the Archaeological Excavations. Povolzhskaya Arheologiya = The Volga River Region Archaeology. 2018;3:30–44. (In Russ.)

Garustovich G.N., Kotov V.G. Tanalyk I Settlement. Ufimskij arheologicheskij vestnik = Ufa Archaeological Herald. 2007;6–7:32–49. (In Russ.)

Grigoriev S.A., Salugina N.P. Petrovskaya and Alakulskaya Ceramics of the Mochishche Settlement in the Southern Trans-Urals. Rossijskaya arheologiya = Russian Archaeology. 2020;2:45–59. (In Russ.)

Gutkov A.I. Equipment and Manufacturing Techniques of Ceramics of the Arkaim Settlement. In: Arkaim. Research, Search, Opening. Chelyabinsk: Tvorcheskoe ob'edinenie “Kamennyj poyas”, 1995. Pp. 135–147. (In Russ.)

Gutkov A.I. Technical and Technological Analysis of Ceramics of the Ustye I Settlement. In: Ancient Ustye: Fortified Settlement of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals. Chelyabinsk : Abris, 2013. Pp. 179–184. (In Russ.)

Dubovtseva E.N., Kiseleva D.V., Panteleeva S.E. Technological Study of the Sintashta Type Ceramics from the Kamenny Ambar Settlement. Uralskij istoriceskij vestnik = Ural historical journal. 2016;4(53):99–110. (In Russ.)

Zhurbin I.V. Report on Research Work on the Topic: “Development of the Methodology for Electrometric Studies and Measurements at the Site of Ulak I Settlement”. Izhevsk, 2002. In: The Archive of the State Budgetary Institution of Culture at the Scientific and Production Centre for the Protection and Use of Immovable Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Bashkortostan. 60 p. (In Russ.)

Zdanovich G.B., Korobkova G.F. New Data on the Economic Activity of the Population of the Bronze Age (according to the results of traceological study tools from the settlement of Petrovka II). In: Problems of Archaeology of the Ural-Kazakhstan Steppes. Chelyabinsk : Chelyabinskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 1988. Pp. 60–79. (In Russ.)

Zdanovich S.Ya., Siomin D.V. Stone Tools of the Arkaim Settlement. In: Arkaim. The Archaeology of Fortified Settlements: in 2 books. Book 2: Fortifications and Public Space. Chelyabinsk : Chelyabinskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2022. Pp. 300–322. (In Russ.)

Korobkova G.F., Vinogradov N.B. Stone and Bone Tools from the Settlement of Kulevi III. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Istoricheskie nauki = Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State Pedagogical University. Ser. 1: Historical Sciences.2004;2:57–87. (In Russ.)

Korobkova G.F., Shchelinsky V.E. Methodology of Micro-and Macro-Analysis of the Ancient Tools. St. Petersburg : IIMK RAN, 1996. 150 p. (In Russ.)

Kostomarova Yu.V., Novikov I.K., Kostomarov V.M. Tool Complex of the Alakul Population from the Zolotоe‑1 Settlement in the Forest-Steppe Tobol Region. Teoriya i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij = Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research. 2023;35(1):59–75. (In Russ.)

Kotov V.G. Scientific Report on Archaeological Works in Bajmaksky, Burzansky, Meleuzovsky and Kugarchinsky Districts of the Republic of Bashkortostan in 2003. Vol. 1. Ufa, 2004. In: The Archive of the State Budgetary Institution of Culture at the Scientific and Production Centre for the Protection and Use of Immovable Cultural Heritage of the Republic of Bashkortostan. 69 p. (In Russ.)

Kotov V.G. Site-workshop Karyshkino‑11 as a New Lower Paleolithic Site of the Southern Urals. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Ser.: Istoriya = Bulletin of the Perm University. History Series. 2015;1:7–20. (In Russ.)

Kungurova N.Yu. Tracological Study of Stone Objects from the Excavations of the Fortified Settlement of Ustye 1. In: Ancient Ustye: Fortified Settlement of the Bronze Age in the Southern Trans-Urals. Chelyabinsk : Abris, 2013. Pp. 285–330. (In Russ.)

Mukhametdinov V.I. Pottery of the Settlement of Tashla‑2 of the Bashkir Transurals (technological analysis). Ufimskij arheologicheskij vestnik = Ufa Archaeological Herald. 2015;15:21–25. (In Russ.)

Savel’ev N.S., Yaminov A.F. Ulak‑1 — a New Fortified Settlement of the Bronze Age in the Bashkir Trans-Urals Region. In: Peoples of the South Urals and Their Neighbors in Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Ufa : BashGU, 2004. Pp. 204–218. (In Russ.)

Semenov S.A. Prehistoric Technique (the experience of studying the oldest tools and artifacts by the traces of work). Moscow; Leningrad : Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1957. 240 p. (In Russ.)

Soldatkin N.V. Searching for the Bronze Age Fortified Settlements of the Ural-Kazakhstan Steppes on the Basis of Satellite Imagery. Istoriko-geograficheskij zhurnal = Historical Geography Journal. 2024;3(3):48–55. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.58529/2782–6511–2024–3–3–48–55

Published
2025-12-26
How to Cite
Bakhshiev I., Rumiantsev M., Bersenev E. STONE TOOLS FROM THE CIRCULAR-PLAN BRONZE AGE SETTLEMENT OF ULAK‑1 (SOUTHERN URALS, RUSSIA) // THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2025. Vol. 37, № 4. P. 47-63 DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2025)37(4).-03. URL: https://journal.asu.ru/tpai/article/view/18573.
Issue
Vol 37 No 4 (2025)
Section
MATERIAL ANALYSIS IN ARCHAEOLOGY

Copyright (c) 2025 И.И. Бахшиев, М.М. Румянцев, Е.В. Берсенёв

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).