Time-series analysis of zooplankton diversity in upper reaches of the Ob River


Biodiversity indices
time series
hydrological seasons

How to Cite

Burmistrova, O. (2022). Time-series analysis of zooplankton diversity in upper reaches of the Ob River. Acta Biologica Sibirica, 8, 887–901. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7729018


Long-term data sets on various ecosystem parameters serve as the basis for environmental monitoring. Time series analysis is used to identify the structure of dynamic series and their prediction. The demographic characteristics of zooplankton are well suited to analyze seasonal and interannual changes in ecosystems. Since the dynamics of species richness and river flow are often interdependent, we studied zooplankton biodiversity in the upper reaches of the Ob River in relation to the phases of the water regime. A six-year sampling of zooplankton was performed from surface water from the Ob River at two stations near the city of Barnaul. In total, 203 species and forms of zooplankton were detected. In all phases of the water cycle, Rotifera dominated in species number. To analyze the species diversity of zooplankton, we used 20 indices, of which 10 were not random on both coasts and could be used in monitoring. The species diversity of zooplankton in a sample, according to Margalef and Menhinick indices, was the highest during the recession of the second flood wave. The generalized measures of diversity (Williams polydominance and Shannon indices, and Fischer alpha) showed their maximum during the recession of the second wave of high water and in the summer low water period. Statistically significant declines in trends of some species diversity are evidence of small changes in the structure of the zooplankton. Time series analysis in the assessment of community biodiversity helps to select indices suitable for predicting ecosystem state, as well as to identify related changes in the community.



Baird DJ, Baker CJ, Brua RB, Hajibabaei M, McNicol K, Pascoe TJ, de Zwart D (2011) Toward a knowledge infrastructure for traits-based ecological risk assessment. Integrated environmental assessment and management 7(2): 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.129

Berline L, Siokou-Frangou I, Marasović I, Vidjak O, Puelles ML, Mazzocchi MG, Assimakopoulou G, Zervoudaki S, Fonda-Umani S, Conversi A, García-Comas C, Ibaňez F, Gasparini S, Stemmann L, Gorsky G (2012) Intercomparison of six Mediterranean zooplankton time series. Progress in Oceanography 97: 76–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.11.011

Carter JL, Schindler DE, Francis TB (2017) Effects of climate change on zooplankton community interactions in an Alaskan lake. Climat Change Responses 4: 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40665-017-0031-x

Deksne R, Skute A (2011) The influence of ecohydrological factors on the cenosis of the Daugava River zooplankton. Acta Zoologica Lituanica 21: 133–144. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10043-011-0013-3

Dexter E, Bollens SM, Rollwagen‐Bollens G (2020) Native and invasive zooplankton show differing responses to decadal‐scale increases in maximum temperatures in a large temperate river. Limnology and Oceanography Letters 5 (6): 403–409. https://doi.org/10.1002/lol2.10162

Furst D, Aldridge KT, Shiel RJ, Ganf GG, Mills S, Brookes J (2014) Floodplain connectivity facilitates significant export of zooplankton to the main River Murray channel during a flood event. Inland Waters 4 (4): 413–424. https://doi.org/10.5268/IW-4.4.696

Gophen M (2020) The Impact of Climate Change on Zooplankton Biodiversity Index (ZBDI) in Lake Kinneret. Israel Open Journal of Ecology 10 (12): 822–828. https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2020.1012050

Górski K, Collier KJ, Duggan IC, Taylor CM, Hamilton DP (2013) Connectivity and complexity of floodplain habitats govern zooplankton dynamics in a large temperate river system. Freshwater Biology 58 (7): 1458–1470. https://doi.org/10.1111/FWB.12144

Grosholz E, Gallo E (2006) The influence of flood cycle and fish predation on invertebrate production on a restored California floodplain. Hydrobiologia 568: 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0029-z

Haase P, Tonkin JD, Stoll S, Burkhard B, Frenzel M, Geijzendorffer IR, Häuser C, Klotz S, Kühn I, McDowell WH, Mirtl M, Müller F, Musche M, Penner J, Zacharias S, Schmeller DS (2018) The next generation of site-based long-term ecological monitoring: Linking essential biodiversity variables and ecosystem integrity. The Science of the total environment 613-614: 1376–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.111

Havens KE, Motta Pinto-Coelho R, Beklioglu M, Christoffersen KS, Jeppesen E, Lauridsen T, Mazumder A, Méthot G, Pinel Alloul B, Tavşanoğlu UN, Erdoğan S, Vijverberg J (2015) Temperature effects on body size of freshwater crustacean zooplankton from Greenland to the tropics. Hydrobiologia 743: 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-014-2000-8

Hooper DU, Chapin FS III, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setälä H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of Biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecological Monographs 75: 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1890/04-0922

Hu B, Hu X, Nie X, Zhang X, Wu N, Hong Y, Qin HM (2019) Seasonal and inter-annual community structure characteristics of zooplankton driven by water environment factors in a sub-lake of Lake Poyang, China. PeerJ 7: e7590. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.7590

Koslow JA, Couture J (2013) Ocean science: Follow the fish. Nature 502 (7470): 163–164. https://doi.org/10.1038/502163a

Kotovshchikov AV, Dolmatova LA (2018) Dynamics of Chlorophyll a Content in the Ob River and its Relationship with Abiotic Factors. Inland Water Biology 11 (1): 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082918010078

Krztoń W, Pudaś K, Pociecha A, Strzesak M, Kosiba J, Walusiak E, Szarek-Gwiazda E, Wilk-Woźniak E (2017) Microcystins affect zooplankton biodiversity in oxbow lakes. Environmental toxicology and chemistry 36 (1): 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.3519

Lan B, He L, Huang Y, Guo X, Xu W, Zhu C (2021) Tempo-spatial variations of zooplankton communities in relation to environmental factors and the ecological implications: A case study in the hinterland of the Three Gorges Reservoir area, China. PLoS ONE 16(8): e0256313. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256313

Lansac-Tôha FA, Bonecker CC, Velho LF, Simões NR, Dias JD, Alves GM, Takahashi EM (2009) Biodiversity of zooplankton communities in the Upper Paraná River floodplain: interannual variation from long-term studies. Brazilian journal of biology 69 (2): 539– 549. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1519-69842009000300009

Larsen S, Karaus U, Claret C, Sporka F, Hamerlík L, Tockner K (2019) Flooding and hydrologic connectivity modulate community assembly in a dynamic river-floodplain ecosystem. PloS ONE 14(4): e0213227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213227

Mackas DL Pepin P, Verheye HM (2012) Interannual variability of marine zooplankton and their environments: Within- and between-region comparisons. Progress in Oceanography 97-100: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2011.11.002

Magurran AE, Baillie SR, Buckland ST, Dick J, Elston DA, Scott EM, Smith RI, Somerfield PJ, Watt AD (2010) Long-term datasets in biodiversity research and monitoring: assessing change in ecological communities through time. Trends in ecology and evolution 25(10): 574–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2010.06.016

Matsumura-Tundisi T, Tundisi JG, Souza-Soares F, Tundisi JE (2015) Zooplankton community structure of the lower Xingu River (PA) related to the hydrological cycle. Brazilian journal of biology 75 (3): 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/1519-6984.03814BM

Mirtl M, Borer ET, Djukic I, Forsius M, Haubold H, Hugo W, Jourdan J, Lindenmayer D, McDowell WH, Muraoka H, Orenstein DE, Pauw JC, Peterseil J, Shibata H, Wohner C, YuX, Haase P (2018) Genesis, goals and achievements of Long-Term Ecological Research at the global scale: A critical review of ILTER and future directions. Science of the total environment 626: 1439–1462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.001

Napiórkowski P, Bąkowska M, Mrozińska N, Szymańska M, Kolarova N, Obolewski K (2019) The Effect of Hydrological Connectivity on the Zooplankton Structure in Floodplain Lakes of a Regulated Large River (the Lower Vistula, Poland). Water 11 (9): 1924. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091924

Opperman J, Luster RA, McKenney B, Roberts M, Meadows AW (2010) Ecologically Functional Floodplains: Connectivity, Flow Regime, and Scale. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 46: 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00426.x

Ouba A, Abboud-Abi Saab M, Stemmann L (2016) Temporal Variability of Zooplank- ton (2000-2013) in the Levantine Sea: Significant Changes Associated to the 2005- 2010 EMT-like Event? PLoS ONE 11 (7): e0158484. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158484

Potemkina TV, Sheveleva NG, Shaburova NI, Misharina EA, Knizhin IB (2013) Structure and Quantitative Characteristics of Zooplankton and Zoobenthos in the Upper Lena River Basin. Journal of Siberian Federal University Biology 6(3): 313–329. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1389-0110 [In Russian]

Serafim-Junior M, Perbiche-Neves G, Lansac-Toha FA (2019) An Assessment of the Factors Determining Rotifer Assemblage in River-Lake Systems: the Effects of Seasonality and Habitat. Zoologia 36: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3897/zoologia.36.e24191

Thomaz SM, Bini LM, Bozelli RL (2007) Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia 579: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-006-0285-y

Wang L, Chen Q, Han R, Wang B, Tang X (2016) Zooplankton community in Yangtze River Estuary and adjacent sea areas after the impoundment of the Three Gorges Reservoir. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 52: 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1051/limn/2016015

Zingone A, D’Alelio D, Mazzocchi MG, Montresor M, Sarno D (2019) Time series and beyond: multifaceted plankton research at a marine Mediterranean LTER site. Nature Conservation (34): 273–310. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.34.30789

Acta Biologica Sibirica is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

ABS allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:


    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


Download data is not yet available.


Metrics Loading ...