Predicting the distribution of the caucasus endemic Carabus exaratus Quensel, 1806 in the Maxent environment
Статьи
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.11113045

Predicting the distribution of the caucasus endemic Carabus exaratus Quensel, 1806 in the Maxent environment

Chechen State Pedagogical University, 33 Subry Kishievoy St., Grozny, 364068, Russia; Kh. Ibragimov Complex Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Grozny, 364014, Russia
Chechen State Pedagogical University, 33 Subry Kishievoy St., Grozny, 364068, Russia
Altai State University, 61 Lenin St., Barnaul, 656049, Russia; Western Caspian University, 31 Istiglaliyyat St., Baku, Azerbaijan

Аннотация

To investigate how the Caucasian endemic Carabus exaratus is distributed in a changing climate, we conducted modeling of its current and predicted ranges using the Maxent environment. Data from literary sources and our own field collections were used for this study, totaling 99 identified habitats. We utilized 20 bioclimatic variables with a spatial resolution of 30 seconds for the modeling. The analysis revealed several significant factors affecting C. exaratus: average annual temperature (bio 1), precipitation of the warmest quarter (bio 18), precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio 19), seasonality of precipitation (bio 15), isothermal conditions (bio 3), and elevation above sea level (bio 20). By applying the RCP 8.5 climate scenario, we generated maps showing forecasted ranges under changing climate conditions and calculated the areas of both current and predicted ranges. Our findings indicate that global warming will cause a shift and significant reduction in the bioclimatic range of Carabus exaratus.

Acta Biologica Sibirica 10: 317–324 (2024)

doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11113045

Corresponding author: Tamara A. Avtaeva (avtaeva1971@mail.ru)

Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 27 February 2024 | Accepted 3 April 2024 | Published 7 May 2024

http://zoobank.org/EBED7489-F296-48B8-9375-A27DE94D9AE5

Citation: Avtaeva TA, Kushalieva SA, Matsyura AV (2024) Predicting the distribution of the caucasus endemic Carabus exaratus Quensel, 1806 in the Maxent environment. Acta Biologica Sibirica 10: 317–324. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113045

Keywords

Energy efficient measures, Green Zoom, greenness indicators, integrated residential development, sustainable development, standards

Introduction

Biogeography's crucial task is understanding the spatial distribution patterns of species, especially given rising anthropogenic pressures and global climate shifts. These factors are leading to habitat reduction, fragmentation, biodiversity loss, and potential species extinction. Knowing how climate change impacts species distribution is vital for developing effective conservation strategies. Identifying a species' climatic niche is a key aspect of biogeographic and ecological research.

Bioclimatic variables significantly influence the geographical distribution and range characteristics of poikilothermic organisms. Analyzing these variables helps model their potential ranges and predict changes. Our study focuses on the Caucasian endemic Carabus exaratus Quensel, 1806, which is prevalent in the Chechen Republic, spanning from foothill steppes to the subnival zone (Avtaeva et al. 2017; Aidamirova 2011).

MaxEnt, a tool using the principle of maximum entropy, is widely used to model species distribution based on location data while considering habitat constraints. Accurately predicting a species' geographic distribution is crucial for successful conservation efforts (Avtaeva et al. 2019; 2020; 2021; Khomitskiy et al. 2020; Sukhodolskaya et al. 2020; Brygadyrenko et al. 2021).

The advent of GIS technologies has significantly expanded ecologists' capabilities, allowing for the modeling of species range dynamics based on relationships with various environmental factors (Gent et al. 2011; Riahi et al. 2011). Our objective is to model both the current and predicted ranges of Carabus exaratus under the context of global climate change using the MaxEnt environment.

Materials and methods

Data for this study were sourced from literary references and our field collections conducted in various years across the Chechen Republic. We identified 99 habitats for Carabus exaratus (Figs 1a, b).

For bioclimatic modeling, we utilized 20 variables from the WorldClim global climate database with a spatial resolution of 30 seconds (www.worldclim.org). R Studio scripts were employed to refine the model. Due to high correlation between variables, we employed techniques in R Studio to reduce redundancy. We obtained a matrix and excluded factors with correlations above 0.75. Additionally, an "enmeval-results" csv file was generated in R, containing evaluation statistics for different settings combinations. We selected settings corresponding to the minimum AICc (Akaike information criterion corrected) and AIC (Akaike information criterion) values. We conducted potential habitat modeling in the MaxEnt 3.4.4 environment (American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA; https://biodiversityinformatics.amnh.org/open_source/maxent/), using spatial cross-validation with 10 replicates for independent datasets.

Figure 1.Location of Carabus exaratus habitats: a – in the Caucasus, b – in the Chechen Republic.

For predictions of encounter probabilities and spatial distribution modeling of C. exaratus, we applied the "cloglog" complementary log-to-log transformation. Each simulation ran a maximum of 500 iterations. Model verification was done using the Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). AUC measures the model's ability to distinguish between presence and absence of species, ranging from 0 to 1.

To assess predictive capabilities, we set a prediction binarization threshold: areas were considered suitable for species existence if predictions were above the threshold, and unsuitable if below. In our modeling, we used a 10 percentile threshold to exclude individuals from atypical habitats, meaning 90% of presence points were included in the "potential area". The resulting AUC for our C. exaratus model was 0.960 ± 0.008, indicating high reliability. All simulations employed the CCSM 4 (Community Climate System Model, http://www.cesm.ucar.edu/models/ccsm4.0/) and considered the RCP 8.5 (https://www.climatewatchdata.org/pathways/scenarios/) climate change scenario (projecting a 4.1 °C increase). For layer manipulation and area calculations, we used the QGIS 3.18.0 software (Quantum GIS, 2020).

Result and discussion

The analysis of Carabus exaratus revealed several key factors influencing its distribution: average annual temperature (bio 1), precipitation of the warmest quarter (bio 18), precipitation of the coldest quarter (bio 19), seasonality of precipitation (bio 15), isothermal conditions (bio 3), and elevation above sea level (bio 20, see Table 1).

Our model yielded an average AUC value of 0.96, indicating the high efficiency of the C. exaratus distribution model obtained (Figs 2–3).

The simulation results revealed that suitable habitats for Carabus exaratus decrease when the average annual temperature falls below -10 °C or rises above +10°C, and are non-existent above 15 °C (Fig. 3).

Variable Percent contribution Permutation importance
bio18b 78.4 49.7
bio19b 6.6 7.1
bio15b 3.5 5.3
bio8b 2.7 2.2
bio7b 2.4 3.1
bio20b 2.4 10.7
bio3b 2.1 5.8
bio11b 1.4 0.3
0.5 15.8
Table 1.Estimation of bioclimatic parameters affecting C. exaratus distribution

Figure 2.Analysis of the prognostic distribution model accuracy: operational curve trend AUC (1 – test data, 2 – training data, 3 – random prediction).

Figure 3.Model of Carabus exaratus preferences to environmental bioclimatic factors: bio 1 – average annual temperature indicators.

Furthermore, the ratio of average daily and annual temperature amplitudes ranging from -7 °C to +3 °C was observed (Fig. 4).

The simulation indicated that the most favorable elevation range for Carabus exaratus lies between 0 to 500 m above sea level. Although the comfort of living decreases with increasing elevation, it does not reach critical levels (Fig. 5). Notably, within the Chechen Republic, C. exaratus has been recorded at heights ranging from 25 to 2260 m above sea level, predominantly thriving in the floodplain forests of the Tersko-Kuma lowland.

Figure 4.Model of Carabus exaratus preferences to environmental bioclimatic factors: bio 3.

Figure 5.Model of Carabus exaratus preferences to environmental bioclimatic factors: bio 20 altitude.

The distribution of Carabus exaratus is also influenced by precipitation, particularly during the warmest (bio 18) and coldest quarters (bio 19). The optimal precipitation range for the species falls between 150–350 mm, with discomfort noted below 100 mm and above 500 mm (Fig. 6).

Figure 6.Model of Carabus exaratus preferences to environmental bioclimatic factors: bio 18 – precipitation of the warmest quarter; bio 19 – precipitation of the coldest quarter.

Our modeling process produced predictive maps of Carabus exaratus ranges under changing climate conditions, following the RCP 8.5 climate scenario. Notably, the ground layer of biogeocenoses appears to be the most sensitive to climate change due to its inability to shield the soil surface from atmospheric effects. This shift in species ranges may be a result of ongoing climate change. Additionally, climatic variables significantly impact the life cycle and seasonal dynamics of C. exaratus, a species exhibiting a recyclic autumnal type of reproduction (Fig. 7).

Figure 7.Bioclimatic area in Carabus exaratus: a – modern area; b – area of 2050 according to the RCP 8.5 scenario; c – area of 2070 according to RCP 8.5 scenario.

Using the QGIS field calculator, we calculated the sizes of the modern range and the predicted ranges for C. exaratus according to the RCP 8.5 scenario for 2050 and 2070 (Table 2).

RCP 8.5 0.4–0.6 0.6–0.7 0.7–0.8 0.8–1.0
2020 53613.4 47157.4 50015.4 41261.9
2050 41746.2 42386.8 35903.3 12938.1
2070 42212.9 29374.5 23105.2 12845.5
Table 2.Size of the bioclimatic area (sq km) in C. exaratus according to the RCP 8.5 scenario

Conclusion

Our findings reveal a reduction in the predicted ranges compared to the current distribution area of Carabus exaratus. Notably, there is a significant decrease in the most favorable areas, characterized by a comfort index of 0.8–1.0 and 0.7–0.8. The predictive maps, generated using the MaxEnt algorithm and based on identified ecological and climatic niches, generally align with the species' known distribution within the Caucasus region. In essence, our results indicate that global warming is causing a shift and substantial reduction in the bioclimatic range of Carabus exaratus.

References

Aidamirova TA (2011) Carabido complexes (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the foothills of the Northeastern Caucasus. Bulletin of the Moscow Society of Naturalists 116(6): 20–30.

Avtaeva TA, Kushalieva ShA, Fominykh DD (2017) Life cycles of ground beetles of the genus Carabus Linnaeus, 1758 in the conditions of the Chechen Republic. Eurasian Entomological Journal 16(4): 375–387.

Avtaeva TA, Sukhodolskaya RA, Brygadyrenko VV (2021) Modeling the bioclimating range of Pterostichus melanarius (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in conditions of global climate change. Biosystems Diversity 29: 140–150. https://doi.org/10.15421/012119

Avtaeva TA, Sukhodolskaya RA, Skripchinsky AV, Brygadyrenko VV (2019) Range of Pterostichus oblongopunctatus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in conditions of global climate change. Biosystems Diversity 27: 76–84. https://doi.org/10.15421/011912

Avtaeva T, Skripchinsky A, Brygadyrenko V (2020) Changes in the range of Pterostichus melas and P. fornicatus (Coleoptera, Carabidae) on the basis of climatic modeling. Baltic Journal of Coleopterology 20: 109–124.

Brygadyrenko V, Avtaeva T, Matsyura A (2021) Effect of global climate change on the distribution of Anchomenus dorsalis (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in Europe. Acta Biologica Sibirica 7: 237–259. https://doi.org/10.3897/abs.7.e72409

Fourcade Y, Engler JO, Rödder D, Secondi J (2014) Mapping species distributions with MAXENT using a geographically biased sample of presence data: a performance assessment of methods for correcting sampling bias. PLOS ONE 9(5): e97122. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097122

Gent PR, Danabasoglu G, Donner LJ, Holland MM, Hunke EC, Jayne SR, Lawrence DM, Neale RB, Rasch PhJ, Vertenstein M, Worley PH, Yang Z-L, Zhang M (2011) The Community Climate System Model Version 4. Journal of Climate 24: 4973–4991. https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI4083.1

Khomitskiy E, Zamotajlov A, Beliy A, Esipenko L, Balakhnina I (2020) Revisiting the study of the life cycles of predatory ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in the agrolandscape of the foothill zone of Krasnodar Krai. BIO Web of Conferences 21: 00009. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20202100009

Lissovsky AA, Dudov SV (2021) Species-distribution modeling: advantages and limitations of its application. 2. MaxEnt. Biology Bulletin Reviews 11: 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1134/S2079086421030087

Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho Ch, Chirkov V, Fischer G, Kindermann G, Nakicenovic N, Rafaj P (2011) RCP 8.5 – a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Climatic Change 109: 33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y

Sukhodolskaya RA, Avtaeva TA, Gordienko TA (2020) Body size variation in ground beetle Carabus exaratus Quensel, 1806 (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in altitude gradient. Biological diversity of the Caucasus and South of Russia: levels, approaches, state of knowledge: Collective monograph based on the materials of the XXII International Scientific Conference "Biological Diversity of the Caucasus and the South of Russia". Comprehensive Research Institute. LLC "ALEF", Makhachkala, 178–186. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347974817_body_size_variation_in_ground_beetle_carabus_exaratus_quensel_1806_coleoptera_carabidae_in_altitude_gradient/