CHOICE OF THE OPTIMAL EXTRACTANT AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PHENOLIC COM-POUNDS FROM EUROPEAN OLIVE LEAVES (OLEA EUROPAEA L.)

UDC 615.322+ 542.61.[54.061+543.544+64.062+ 543.421/.424]

  • Victoria Nodaryevna Leonova Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education VolgGMU of the Ministry of Health of Russia Email: sheryfka@mail.ru
  • Anna Gurgenovna Kuregyan Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education VolgGMU of the Ministry of Health of Russia Email: kooreguan@mail.ru
Keywords: European olive, oleuropein, polyphenols, thin layer chromatography, spectrophotometry

Abstract

The leaves of the European olive (Olea europaea L.) are characterized by a high content of bioactive polyphenol derivatives that have antioxidant, antiviral, anti-inflammatory, cardioprotective, hypotensive, antitumor effects. The aim of the work is to select the optimal extractant and conditions for the analysis of phenolic compounds from European olive leaves. A comparative analysis of the seven obtained extracts was carried out by spectrophotometry and thin layer chromatography (TLC). The UV spectra of solutions of the compared extracts show an absorption maximum at 280±2 nm, which can be associated with the absorption of a complex of phenolcarboxylic acid derivatives, including oleuropein. The maximum at 328±2 nm characterizes the presence of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives in extracts; in an aqueous extract, it has a short-wavelength shift of 320±2 nm. The presence of the main biologically active compound of the European olive, oleuropein, was found in all extracts by TLC using four mobile phases, and the presence of 2 to 5 polyphenolic compounds was additionally detected. The maximum total content of phenolcarboxylic acids in terms of gallic acid – 2.93% was established for the extract obtained using 40% ethyl alcohol. The highest total content of hydroxycinnamic acids in terms of chlorogenic acid (2.35%) was also extracted with a 40% ethyl alcohol solution. Based on the results of the experiment, it was concluded that for the extraction of the total polyphenols from the leaves of the European olive, it is preferable to use a solution of ethyl alcohol 40%, for oleuropein - water. TLC techniques and spectrophotometric method allow to control the process of extraction of the amount of bioactive compounds from European olive leaves.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Victoria Nodaryevna Leonova , Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education VolgGMU of the Ministry of Health of Russia

candidate of pharmaceutical sciences, associate professor of the department of toxicological and analytical chemistry

Anna Gurgenovna Kuregyan , Pyatigorsk Medical and Pharmaceutical Institute – branch of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education VolgGMU of the Ministry of Health of Russia

doctor of pharmaceutical sciences, professor, professor of the department of pharmaceutical chemistry

References

Bianco A., Ramunno A. Studies in Natural Products Chemistry, 2006, vol. 33, pp. 859–903. DOI: 10.1016/S1572-5995(06)80042-6.

Dekanski D., Mihailovic-Stanojevic N., Milanovic G., Jovovic D., Miloradovic Z. Journal of the Serbian Chemical Society, 2014, vol. 79 (9), pp. 1085–1097. DOI: 10.2298/JSC140218030D.

Paiva-Martins F., Barbosa S., Silva M., Monteiro D., Pinheiro V., Mourao J.L., Fernandes J., Rocha S., Belo L., San-tos-Silva A. Journal of Functional Foods, 2014, vol. 9, pp. 271–279. DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2014.04.027.

Vozdelyvaniye masliny na territorii SSSR [Olive cultivation in the USSR]. URL: https://www.activestudy.info/vozdelyvanie-masliny-na-territorii-sssr/. (in Russ.).

Shvanova V.V. Bol'shaya rossiyskaya entsiklopediya. [Great Russian Encyclopedia]. Moscow, 2011, vol. 19, pp. 278–279. (in Russ.).

Guinda A., Castellano J.M., Santos-Lozano J.M., Delgado-Hervas T., Gutierrez-Adanez P., Rada M. LWT – Food Sci-ence Technology, 2015, vol. 64, pp. 431–438.

Lockyer S., Yaqoob P., Spencer J., Rowland I. Nutrition and Aging, 2012, vol. 1, pp. 125–140. DOI: 10.3233/NUA-2012-0011.

Romani A., Ieri F., Urciuoli S., NoceA., Marrone G., Nediani C., Bernini R. Nutrients, 2019, vol. 11(8), 1776. DOI: 10.3390/nu11081776.

Gosudarstvennaya farmakopeya RF. XIV izd. [State Pharmacopoeia of the Russian Federation, 14th ed.]. Moscow, 2018, vol. 1, 1814 p. (in Russ.).

Capasso R., Evidente A., Scognamiglio F.A. Phytochemical Analysis, 1992, vol. 3, pp. 270–275.

European pharmacopoeia 10.0. France, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 1557–1559.

United States Pharmacopeia 43 NF 38. 2020. URL: https://online.uspnf.com/uspnf/document/1_GUID-9A3B3F87-CF7E-4722-94CC-C5D343BDF64C_1_en-US.

Virot M., Tomao V., Colnagui G., Visinoni F., Chemat F. Journal of Chromatography A, 2007, vol. 1174 (1-2), pp. 138–144. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2007.09.067.

Hashmi M.A., Khan A., Hanif M., Farooq U., Perveen S. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2015, vol. 2015, article 541591. DOI: 10.1155/2015/541591.

Kheirandish F., Mosaffa N., Tarahi M.J., Fallahi S. Parasite Immunology, 2018, vol. 40 (4), e12520. DOI: 10.1111/pim.12520.

Pereira A.P., Ferreira I., Marcelino F., Valentão P., Andrade P., Seabra R., Estevinho L., Bento A., Pereira J.A. Mole-cules, 2007, vol. 12 (5), pp. 1153–1162. DOI: 10.3390/12051153.

Romero C., Medina E., Mateo M.A., Brenes M. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2016, vol. 97 (6), pp. 1725–1732. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.7920.

Şahin S., Bilgin M. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2017, vol. 98 (4), pp. 1271–1279. DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.8619.

Flemmig J., Kuchta K., Arnhold J., Rauwald H.W. Phytomedicine, 2011, vol. 18 (7), pp. 561–566. DOI: 10.1016/j.phymed.2010.10.021.

Olmo-García L., Bajoub A., Benlamaalam S., Hurtado-Fernández E., Bagur-González M., Chigr M. Molecules, 2018, vol. 23 (10), 2524. DOI: 10.3390/molecules23102524.

Zaïri A., Nouir S., Zarrouk A., Haddad H., Khélifa A., Achour L. Food Science and Nutrition, 2020, vol. 8 (9), pp. 4805–4813. DOI: 10.1002/fsn3.1755.

Goulas V., Exarchou V., Troganis A.N., Psomiadou E., Fotsis T., Briasoulis E., Gerothanassis I.P. Molecular Nutri-tion and Food Research, 2009, vol. 53 (5), pp. 600–608. DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.200800204.

Omar M., Sabry M. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 2014, vol. 4, no. 19, pp. 1–9.

Farmakopeya Yevraziyskogo ekonomicheskogo soyuza. [Pharmacopoeia of the Eurasian Economic Union]. Moscow, 2020, vol. 1-1, pp. 517–528. (in Russ.).

Patent 2613878 C2 (RU). 2015. (in Russ.).

Published
2024-09-25
How to Cite
1. Leonova V. N., Kuregyan A. G. CHOICE OF THE OPTIMAL EXTRACTANT AND CONDITIONS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF PHENOLIC COM-POUNDS FROM EUROPEAN OLIVE LEAVES (OLEA EUROPAEA L.) // chemistry of plant raw material, 2024. № 3. P. 198-206. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/cw/article/view/12655.
Section
Low-molecular weight compounds