COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE CALCULATION OF HEAT OF COMBUSTION OF BIOPOLYMERS

  • Michael (Михаил) Yacob (Яковлевич) Ioelovich (Иоелович) Designer Energy Email: bd895892@zahav.net.il
Keywords: biopolymers, biomass, chemical structure, elemental composition, composition, heat of combustion, Calculation methods, calorimetry

Abstract

In this paper, various methods for calculating the higher (Q) and lower (q) calorific values for plant biopolymers (lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, starch, pectin, proteins) and some other components of biomass (resin acids, lipids, ). The results of the studies showed that calculations using the Eq parameter (i.e., the combustion energy per 1 g of O2) give a deviation from the experimental values of about 4% for Q and more than 7% for q. In the case of calculations based on the contribution of structural groups of polymers, the deviation is on average 3%. The lowest deviation from the experimental data, about 0,5% for Q and less than 1% for q, was obtained using an improved calculation method that is based on determining the elemental composition of biopolymers and other biomass components. Calculations of the calorific values for biomass samples using the proposed improved method were very close to the experimental values of the calorific value. It has been found that the most preferred method of waste disposal is the burning of pellets, their waste plant biomass and polyolefins, since this combustion method provides more high calorific value and increased thermal energy density than a single combustion of only biomass and is accompanied by a smaller amount Carbon dioxide in comparison with the separate burning of only waste polyolefins.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Michael (Михаил) Yacob (Яковлевич) Ioelovich (Иоелович), Designer Energy
Chief Chemist of Designer Energy Co., Head of Chemical Dep.

References

Ioelovich M. Advance in Energy, 2014, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 15–20.

Energy recover from waste. Report of New Energy Co. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.newenergycorp.com.au/what-we-do/waste-hierarchy. New Energy, West Perth, 2016.

Vargas-Moreno J.M., Callejón-Ferrea A.J., Pérez-Alonsoa J., Velázquez-Martí B. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, vol. 16, pp. 3065–3083.

Suris A.L. Chem. Pertol. Eng., 2007, vol. 43, no. 1–2, pp. 20–21.

Maksimuk Iu.V., Kruk V.S., Antonova Z.A., Ponomarev D.A., Sushkova A.V. Lesnoi zhurnal, 2016, no. 6, pp. 110–121. (in Russ.).

Parikh J., Channiwala S.A., Ghosal G.K. Fuel., 2005, vol. 84, pp. 487–494.

Huggett C. Fire and Mater, 1980, vol. 4, pp. 61–65.

Babrauskas V. Heat Release in Fires, New York: Elsevier, 1992, ch. 8, pp. 251–255.

Walters R.N., Lyon R.E., Hackett S.M. Fire and Mater, 2000, vol. 24, pp. 1–13.

Willfor S., Sjoholm R., Laine C., Roslund M., Hemming J., Holmbom B. Carbohydrate Polym., 2003, vol. 52, pp. 175–187.

Dubtsova G.N., Kolpakova V.V., Nechaev P.P. Ispol'zovanie belkovykh produktov iz pshenitsy v pishchevykh pro-izvodstvakh. [Use of protein products from wheat in food production]. Moscow, 1992, 40 p. (in Russ.).

Holloway P.J. Phytochemistry, 1983, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 495–502.

Sluiter J.B., Ruiz R.O., Scarlata C.J., Sluiter A.D., Templeton D.W. J Agric. Food Chem., 2010, vol. 58, no. 16, pp. 9043–9053.

Ioelovich M. J. Basic Appl. Res. Int., 2016, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 96–103.

Goldberg R.N., Schliesser J., Mittal A. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2015, vol. 81, pp. 184–226.

Kabo G.J., Voitkevich O.V. Blokhin A.V. J. Chem. Thermodyn., 2013, vol. 59, pp. 87–93.

Published
2016-12-29
How to Cite
1. Ioelovich (Иоелович)M. (Михаил) Y. (Яковлевич) COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE CALCULATION OF HEAT OF COMBUSTION OF BIOPOLYMERS // chemistry of plant raw material, 2016. № 2. P. 49-46. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/cw/article/view/1625.
Section
Biopolymers of plants