MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF POPULATION RELIGIOSITY IN RUSSIA'S ASIAN BORDERLANDS
Article Sidebar
Published:
Dec 28, 2023
Keywords:
religiosity, border regions, Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS), intellectual component of religiosity, ideological component of religiosity, component of public religious practices, component of personal religious practices, component of religious experience, multidimensional approach to religiosity
Main Article Content
Svetlana G. Maximova
Email: svet-maximova@yandex.ru
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4613-4966
Oksana E. Noyanzina
Email: noe@list.ru
Daria A. Omelchenko
Email: daria.omelchenko@mail.ru
Abstract
The article is focused on an analysis of sociological methods of evaluation of religiosity in the context of current transformations of religious consciousness and worldview, the blurring of boundaries between the secular and the religious, and the prevalence of hybrid variants of religious identity, which imply religiosity "beyond confession" and passive religious practices. The authors defend the vision of religiosity as a multidimensional construct that combines objective and subjective, static and dynamic, internal and external characteristics and manifestations. The authors present the results of sociological studies of the population's religiosity in four border regions of Russia - Altai Krai, Novosibirsk Oblast, Republic of Altai, and Republic of Tyva (n = 400 in each region). The Centrality CRS index (Centrality CRS Sh. Huber) is used as the main tool for analyzing religiosity, which allows for an assessment on five dimensions (levels) - cognitions (information), belief (ideology), personal and public practices and religious experience, taking into account the polyconfessional nature of regional societies. The objectives of the study were to compare the results obtained on the national sample with the results in the conditions of the border region and its separate regions characterized by ethno-confessional uniqueness, to analyze the individual dimensions of religiosity and their interrelation with the general index on the basis of factor analysis. It is shown that the index has good psychometric properties, and its individual dimensions are well described by a single-factor structure. The level of religiosity in all four regions generally corresponds to the all-Russian level, while there are serious differences between the regions, caused not only by the axis - national (ethnic) regions - multi-ethnic regions with a dominant Russian and Orthodox population, but also by individual dimensions.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Metrics Loading ...
Article Details
How to Cite
Maximova, S. G., Noyanzina, O. E., & Omelchenko, D. A. (2023). MULTIDIMENSIONAL APPROACH TO EVALUATION OF POPULATION RELIGIOSITY IN RUSSIA’S ASIAN BORDERLANDS. Society and Security Insights, 6(4), 39-60. https://doi.org/10.14258/SSI(2023)4-03
Section
SECURITY AND INTEGRATION IN COUNTRIES OF ASIAN REGION
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright of their manuscripts, and all Open Access articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited.
References
Богачёв М.И. К вопросу о формировании интегрального подхода к концептуализации религиозности // Свет Христов просвещает всех: альманах Свято-Филаретовского православно-христианского института. 2016. № 18. С. 9–26.
Борисова О.Н., Павлюткин И.В. Вариативность моделей современной городской многодетности: возрождение традиции, новые браки или сетевые эффекты? // Мир России. 2019. № 4. С. 128–151.
Бреская О.Ю. Изучение религиозности: к необходимости интегрального подхода // Социологические исследования. 2011. № 12. С. 77–87.
Забаев И.В., Пруцкова Е.В. Община православного храма: пространственная локализация и факторы формирования (на примере г. Москвы) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2012. Вып. 3 (41). С. 57–67.
Задорин И.В., Хомякова А.П. Религиозная самоидентификация респондентов в массовых опросах // Полития. 2019. № 3 (94). С. 161-184
Каргина И.Г. Социологические рефлексии современного религиозного плюрализма. Москва: МГИМО – Университет, 2014. 278 с.
Лебедев С.Д. Социологическое измерение религиозности: к типологии основных подходов // Социология и общество: традиции и инновации в социальном развитии регионов: Сборник докладов VI Всероссийского социологического конгресса, Тюмень, 14–16 октября 2020 года / Отв. редактор В.А. Мансуров. Тюмень: Российское общество социологов, 2020. С. 4962-4979.
Мчедлов М.П. Религиоведческие очерки. Религия в духовной и общественно-политической жизни современной России. М.: Научная книга, 2005. 447 с.
Орешина Д.А. «Партнерский приход»: сотрудничество священнослужителей и мирян как фактор развития социальной деятельности в современных приходах Русской православной церкви // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2016. Вып. 5 (67). С. 99–120.
Орешина Д.А. Изучение приходских общин в социологии: контексты исследования и основные подходы к концептуализации // Социология: 4М. 2014. № 39. С. 99–126.
Подлесная М.А. Особенности сетевого и нишевого подходов в изучении православного прихода в России и за рубежом // Вестник Института социологии. 2014. № 11. C. 93–105.
Подлесная М.А., Мельникова В. В. Религиозная община в жизни инвалидов // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 10. С. 145–151.
Пруцкова Е.В. Связь религиозности и ценностно-нормативных показателей: фактор религиозной социализации // Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 1: Богословие. Философия. 2015. № 3 (59). С. 62–80.
Руткевич Е.Д. От «Религиозности» к «Духовности»: Европейский контекст // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2014. №1. С. 5–25.
Синелина Ю.Ю. Циклы секуляризации в истории России. Социологический анализ: конец XYII – начало XXI века. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing, 2011. 382 с.
Тейлор Ч. Секулярный век; [пер. с англ. А. Васильев, Л. Колкер, А. Лукьянов]. Москва: ББИ, 2017. 967 с.
Филатов С.Б., Лункин Р.Н. Статистика российской религиозности: магия цифр и неоднозначная реальность // Социологические исследования. 2005. № 4. С. 35–45.
Фолкнер Д., Де Йонг Г. Религиозность в пяти измерениях: эмпирический анализ // Социологические исследования. 2011. № 12. С. 69–76.
Хлопкова О.В. Трансформация подходов к исследованию религиозности в социальных науках // Человек. Социум. Общество. 2020. № 2. С. 122–130.
Хубер Ш., Хубер О. Шкала центральности религиозности (CRS) / Пер. с англ. Е. В. Пруцковой, К. В. Маркина // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология:4М). 2018. Том. 0. № 47. С. 144-171.
Чеснокова В.Ф. Тесным путем: Процесс воцерковления населения России в конце XX века. М.: Академический Проект, 2005. 304 с.
Эрвьё-Леже Д. В поисках определенности: парадоксы религиозности в обществах развитого модерна // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2015. № 1 (33). С. 254–268.
Allport G. W., Ross J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967. Vol. 5 No. 4. P. 432–443.
Berger P. L. Modern identity: Crisis and continuity / W. S. Dillon (Ed.), The cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1974. P. 158-181
Bullard G. The World's Newest Major Religion: No Religion // The New Your Times. April, 22. 2016. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html (Accessed 1 October 2023).
Davie G. Is Europe an Exceptional Case? // The Hedgehog Review, 2006. P. 23-34.
Davie G. New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective // Social Compass. 2004. No. 53. P. 73–84.
Glock C.Y. On the Study of Religious Commitment // Religious Education. 1962. Vol. 57. No. 4. P. 98–110.
Glock C.Y. Religion in Sociological Perspective: Essays in the Empirical Study of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1973. 315 p.
Glock Y. On the Study of Religious Commitment // Religious Education, Researh Supplement. 1962. No. 42. P. 99–100.
Glock Сh., Stark R. The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkley, 1968. 230 p.
Hill P. C., Hood R. W. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press, 1999. 531 p.
Hilty D. M., Morgan R. L. Construct validation for the Religious Involvement Inventory: Replication // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1985. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 75–86.
Holt C. L., Clark E. M., Wang M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. The Religion-Health Connection Among African Americans: What Is the Role of Social Capital? // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2014. No. 25. P. 1–18.
Homans G.C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974. 404 p.
Huber S., Ackert M., Scheiblich H. Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale // Cultura & psyche. 2020. Vol. 1. No. 1-2. P. 171-185. Springer Nature Switzerland 10.1007/s43638-020-00007-3.
Joshanloo M., Daemi F. Self-esteem mediates the relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being in Iran // International Journal of Psychology. 2015. Vol. 50. No. 2. P. 115–120.
King M. B., Hunt R. A. Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1972. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 240–251.
Lenski G. The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1961, 381 p.
Machado D. L., Turner B. S., Trygve E. W. Borderland Religion: Ambiguous practices of difference, hope and beyond. Routledge, 2018, 188.
Stark R., Glock C.Y. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley Univ. Press, 1968, 230 p.
Stryker S. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1980, 161 p.
Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion // The Arda Association of Religion Data Archives Guiding Paper Series. 2010. No. 1-20. P. 115–120.
Wimberley D.W. Religion and Role-Identity: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Conceptualization of Religiosity // The Sociological Quarterly. 1989. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 125–142.
References
Bogachev, M. I. (2016). On the formation of an integral approach to the conceptualization of religiosity. The Light of Christ Enlightens All: Almanac of St. Philaret's Orthodox Christian Institute, 18, 9–26. (In Russ.).
Borisova, O. N., Pavlyutkin I. В. (2019). Variability of models of modern urban polygyny: revival of tradition, new marriages or network effects? Mir Rossii, 4, 128–151. (In Russ.).
Breskaya, O. Yu. (2011). Studying religiosity: to the need for an integral approach. Sociological Studies, 12, 77–87. (In Russ.).
Zabaev, I. V., Prutskova, E. V. (2012). Community of the Orthodox church: spatial localization and factors of formation (on the example of Moscow). Vestnik PSTGU. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 3(41), 57–67. (In Russ.).
Zadorin, I. V., Khomyakova, A. P. (2019). Religious self-identification of respondents in mass surveys. Politiya, 3(94), 161–184. (In Russ.).
Kargina, I. G. (2014). Sociological reflexions of modern religious pluralism. Moscow: MGIMO-University. (In Russ.).
Lebedev, S. D. (2020). Sociological dimension of religiosity: to the typology of the main approaches. In: V.A. Mansurov (Ed.). Sociology and society: traditions and innovations in the social development of regions: Collection of reports of the VI All-Russian Sociological Congress, Tyumen, October 14-16, 2020 (pp. 4962-4979). Tyumen: Russian Society of Sociologists. (In Russ.)] DOI 10.19181/kongress.2020.584.
Mchedlov, M. P. (2005). Religious studies essays. Religion in the spiritual and socio-political life of modern Russia. Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. А. (2016). "Partner parish": cooperation of clergy and laity as a factor in the development of social activity in modern parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church. Vestnik PSTGU. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 5(67), 99–120. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. A. (2014). Studying parish communities in sociology: research contexts and main approaches to conceptualization. Sociology: 4M, 39, 99–126. (In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A. (2014). Features of network and niche approaches in the study of the Orthodox parish in Russia and abroad. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 11, 93-105. (In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A., Melnikova, V. V. (2015). Religious community in the life of the disabled. Sociological studies, 10, 145–151. (In Russ.).
Prutskova, E. V. (2015). Relation of religiosity and value-normative indicators: a factor of religious socialization. Bulletin of the Orthodox Svyato-Tikhonovsky Humanitarian University. Series 1: Theology. Philosophy, 3(59), 62–80. (In Russ.).
Rutkevich, E. D. (2014). From "Religiosity" to "Spirituality": European context. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology, 1, 5–25. (In Russ.).
Sinelina, Yu. Yu. (2017). Cycles of secularization in the history of Russia. Sociological analysis: the end of XYII - the beginning of XXI century. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing. (In Russ.).
Taylor, C. (2017). Secular Age; [Translated by. A. Vasiliev, L. Kolker, A. Lukyanov]. Moscow: BBI. (In Russ.).
Filatov, S. B., Lunkin, R. N. (2005). Statistics of Russian religiosity: magic numbers and ambiguous reality. Sociological Studies, 4, 35–45. (In Russ.).
Faulkner, D., De Jong, G. (2011). Religiosity in five dimensions: an empirical analysis. Sociological Research, 12, 69–76. (In Russ.).
Khlopkova, O. V. (2020). Transformation of approaches to the study of religiosity in social sciences. Man. Sotsium. Society, 2, 122–130. (In Russ.).
Huber, S., Huber, O. (2018). Religiosity Centrality Scale (CRS) / Translated from English by E. V. Prutskova, K. V. Markin. Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M), 47, 144-171. (In Russ.).
Chesnokova, V. F. (2005). Tight path: The Process of Russian Population's Voterization at the End of the 20th Century. Moscow: Academic Project. (In Russ.).
Hervieux-Leger, D. (2015). In Search of Certainty: Paradoxes of Religiosity in Developed Modern Societies. State, Religion, Church in Russia and Abroad, 1(33), 254-268. (In Russ.).
Allport, G. W., Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.
Berger, P. L. (1974). Modern identity: Crisis and continuity. In: W. S. Dillon (Ed.), The cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment (pp. 158-181). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bullard, G. (2016). The World's Newest Major Religion: No Religion. The New Your Times. April, 22. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html.
Davie, G. (2006). Is Europe an Exceptional Case? The Hedgehog Review, Spring & Summer, 23-34.
Davie, G. (2004). New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective. Social Compass, 53, 73–84.
Glock, C.Y. (1962). On the Study of Religious Commitment. Religious Education, 57(4), 98–110.
Glock, C.Y. (1973). Religion in Sociological Perspective: Essays in the Empirical Study of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Glock, Y. (1962). On the Study of Religious Commitment. Religious Education, Researh Supplement, 42, 99–100.
Glock, Сh., Stark, R. (1968). The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkley.
Hill, P. C., Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.
Hilty, D. M., Morgan, R. L. (1985). Construct validation for the Religious Involvement Inventory: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(1), 75–86.
Holt, C. L., Clark, E. M., Wang, M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. (2014). The Religion-Health Connection Among African Americans: What Is the Role of Social Capital? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, (25): 1–18.
Homans, G.C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Huber, S., Ackert, M., Scheiblich, H. (2020). Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale. Cultura & psyché, 1(1-2), 171-185. Springer Nature Switzerland 10.1007/s43638-020-00007-3.
Joshanloo, M., Daemi, F. (2015). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being in Iran. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 115–120.
King, M. B., Hunt, R. A. (1972). Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11(3), 240–251.
Lenski, G. (1961). The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Machado, D. L., Turner, B. S., Trygve, E. W. (2018). Borderland Religion: Ambiguous practices of difference, hope and beyond. Routledge.
Stark, R., Glock, C.Y. (1968). American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley Univ. Press.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Voas, D., Day, A. (2010). Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion. The Arda Association of Religion Data Archives Guiding Paper Series, 1-20, 115–120.
Wimberley, D.W. (1989). Religion and Role-Identity: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Conceptualization of Religiosity. The Sociological Quarterly, 30(1), 125–142.
Борисова О.Н., Павлюткин И.В. Вариативность моделей современной городской многодетности: возрождение традиции, новые браки или сетевые эффекты? // Мир России. 2019. № 4. С. 128–151.
Бреская О.Ю. Изучение религиозности: к необходимости интегрального подхода // Социологические исследования. 2011. № 12. С. 77–87.
Забаев И.В., Пруцкова Е.В. Община православного храма: пространственная локализация и факторы формирования (на примере г. Москвы) // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2012. Вып. 3 (41). С. 57–67.
Задорин И.В., Хомякова А.П. Религиозная самоидентификация респондентов в массовых опросах // Полития. 2019. № 3 (94). С. 161-184
Каргина И.Г. Социологические рефлексии современного религиозного плюрализма. Москва: МГИМО – Университет, 2014. 278 с.
Лебедев С.Д. Социологическое измерение религиозности: к типологии основных подходов // Социология и общество: традиции и инновации в социальном развитии регионов: Сборник докладов VI Всероссийского социологического конгресса, Тюмень, 14–16 октября 2020 года / Отв. редактор В.А. Мансуров. Тюмень: Российское общество социологов, 2020. С. 4962-4979.
Мчедлов М.П. Религиоведческие очерки. Религия в духовной и общественно-политической жизни современной России. М.: Научная книга, 2005. 447 с.
Орешина Д.А. «Партнерский приход»: сотрудничество священнослужителей и мирян как фактор развития социальной деятельности в современных приходах Русской православной церкви // Вестник ПСТГУ. Серия I: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2016. Вып. 5 (67). С. 99–120.
Орешина Д.А. Изучение приходских общин в социологии: контексты исследования и основные подходы к концептуализации // Социология: 4М. 2014. № 39. С. 99–126.
Подлесная М.А. Особенности сетевого и нишевого подходов в изучении православного прихода в России и за рубежом // Вестник Института социологии. 2014. № 11. C. 93–105.
Подлесная М.А., Мельникова В. В. Религиозная община в жизни инвалидов // Социологические исследования. 2015. № 10. С. 145–151.
Пруцкова Е.В. Связь религиозности и ценностно-нормативных показателей: фактор религиозной социализации // Вестник Православного Свято-Тихоновского гуманитарного университета. Серия 1: Богословие. Философия. 2015. № 3 (59). С. 62–80.
Руткевич Е.Д. От «Религиозности» к «Духовности»: Европейский контекст // Вестник Российского университета дружбы народов. Серия: Социология. 2014. №1. С. 5–25.
Синелина Ю.Ю. Циклы секуляризации в истории России. Социологический анализ: конец XYII – начало XXI века. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing, 2011. 382 с.
Тейлор Ч. Секулярный век; [пер. с англ. А. Васильев, Л. Колкер, А. Лукьянов]. Москва: ББИ, 2017. 967 с.
Филатов С.Б., Лункин Р.Н. Статистика российской религиозности: магия цифр и неоднозначная реальность // Социологические исследования. 2005. № 4. С. 35–45.
Фолкнер Д., Де Йонг Г. Религиозность в пяти измерениях: эмпирический анализ // Социологические исследования. 2011. № 12. С. 69–76.
Хлопкова О.В. Трансформация подходов к исследованию религиозности в социальных науках // Человек. Социум. Общество. 2020. № 2. С. 122–130.
Хубер Ш., Хубер О. Шкала центральности религиозности (CRS) / Пер. с англ. Е. В. Пруцковой, К. В. Маркина // Социология: методология, методы, математическое моделирование (Социология:4М). 2018. Том. 0. № 47. С. 144-171.
Чеснокова В.Ф. Тесным путем: Процесс воцерковления населения России в конце XX века. М.: Академический Проект, 2005. 304 с.
Эрвьё-Леже Д. В поисках определенности: парадоксы религиозности в обществах развитого модерна // Государство, религия, церковь в России и за рубежом. 2015. № 1 (33). С. 254–268.
Allport G. W., Ross J. M. Personal religious orientation and prejudice // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1967. Vol. 5 No. 4. P. 432–443.
Berger P. L. Modern identity: Crisis and continuity / W. S. Dillon (Ed.), The cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1974. P. 158-181
Bullard G. The World's Newest Major Religion: No Religion // The New Your Times. April, 22. 2016. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html (Accessed 1 October 2023).
Davie G. Is Europe an Exceptional Case? // The Hedgehog Review, 2006. P. 23-34.
Davie G. New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective // Social Compass. 2004. No. 53. P. 73–84.
Glock C.Y. On the Study of Religious Commitment // Religious Education. 1962. Vol. 57. No. 4. P. 98–110.
Glock C.Y. Religion in Sociological Perspective: Essays in the Empirical Study of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 1973. 315 p.
Glock Y. On the Study of Religious Commitment // Religious Education, Researh Supplement. 1962. No. 42. P. 99–100.
Glock Сh., Stark R. The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkley, 1968. 230 p.
Hill P. C., Hood R. W. Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press, 1999. 531 p.
Hilty D. M., Morgan R. L. Construct validation for the Religious Involvement Inventory: Replication // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1985. Vol. 24. No. 1. P. 75–86.
Holt C. L., Clark E. M., Wang M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. The Religion-Health Connection Among African Americans: What Is the Role of Social Capital? // Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 2014. No. 25. P. 1–18.
Homans G.C. Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1974. 404 p.
Huber S., Ackert M., Scheiblich H. Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale // Cultura & psyche. 2020. Vol. 1. No. 1-2. P. 171-185. Springer Nature Switzerland 10.1007/s43638-020-00007-3.
Joshanloo M., Daemi F. Self-esteem mediates the relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being in Iran // International Journal of Psychology. 2015. Vol. 50. No. 2. P. 115–120.
King M. B., Hunt R. A. Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1972. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 240–251.
Lenski G. The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1961, 381 p.
Machado D. L., Turner B. S., Trygve E. W. Borderland Religion: Ambiguous practices of difference, hope and beyond. Routledge, 2018, 188.
Stark R., Glock C.Y. American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley Univ. Press, 1968, 230 p.
Stryker S. Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings, 1980, 161 p.
Voas D., Day A. Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion // The Arda Association of Religion Data Archives Guiding Paper Series. 2010. No. 1-20. P. 115–120.
Wimberley D.W. Religion and Role-Identity: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Conceptualization of Religiosity // The Sociological Quarterly. 1989. Vol. 30, No. 1. P. 125–142.
References
Bogachev, M. I. (2016). On the formation of an integral approach to the conceptualization of religiosity. The Light of Christ Enlightens All: Almanac of St. Philaret's Orthodox Christian Institute, 18, 9–26. (In Russ.).
Borisova, O. N., Pavlyutkin I. В. (2019). Variability of models of modern urban polygyny: revival of tradition, new marriages or network effects? Mir Rossii, 4, 128–151. (In Russ.).
Breskaya, O. Yu. (2011). Studying religiosity: to the need for an integral approach. Sociological Studies, 12, 77–87. (In Russ.).
Zabaev, I. V., Prutskova, E. V. (2012). Community of the Orthodox church: spatial localization and factors of formation (on the example of Moscow). Vestnik PSTGU. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 3(41), 57–67. (In Russ.).
Zadorin, I. V., Khomyakova, A. P. (2019). Religious self-identification of respondents in mass surveys. Politiya, 3(94), 161–184. (In Russ.).
Kargina, I. G. (2014). Sociological reflexions of modern religious pluralism. Moscow: MGIMO-University. (In Russ.).
Lebedev, S. D. (2020). Sociological dimension of religiosity: to the typology of the main approaches. In: V.A. Mansurov (Ed.). Sociology and society: traditions and innovations in the social development of regions: Collection of reports of the VI All-Russian Sociological Congress, Tyumen, October 14-16, 2020 (pp. 4962-4979). Tyumen: Russian Society of Sociologists. (In Russ.)] DOI 10.19181/kongress.2020.584.
Mchedlov, M. P. (2005). Religious studies essays. Religion in the spiritual and socio-political life of modern Russia. Moscow: Nauchnaya Kniga. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. А. (2016). "Partner parish": cooperation of clergy and laity as a factor in the development of social activity in modern parishes of the Russian Orthodox Church. Vestnik PSTGU. Series I: Theology. Philosophy. Religious Studies, 5(67), 99–120. (In Russ.).
Oreshina, D. A. (2014). Studying parish communities in sociology: research contexts and main approaches to conceptualization. Sociology: 4M, 39, 99–126. (In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A. (2014). Features of network and niche approaches in the study of the Orthodox parish in Russia and abroad. Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology, 11, 93-105. (In Russ.).
Podlesnaya, M. A., Melnikova, V. V. (2015). Religious community in the life of the disabled. Sociological studies, 10, 145–151. (In Russ.).
Prutskova, E. V. (2015). Relation of religiosity and value-normative indicators: a factor of religious socialization. Bulletin of the Orthodox Svyato-Tikhonovsky Humanitarian University. Series 1: Theology. Philosophy, 3(59), 62–80. (In Russ.).
Rutkevich, E. D. (2014). From "Religiosity" to "Spirituality": European context. Bulletin of the Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology, 1, 5–25. (In Russ.).
Sinelina, Yu. Yu. (2017). Cycles of secularization in the history of Russia. Sociological analysis: the end of XYII - the beginning of XXI century. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academia Publishing. (In Russ.).
Taylor, C. (2017). Secular Age; [Translated by. A. Vasiliev, L. Kolker, A. Lukyanov]. Moscow: BBI. (In Russ.).
Filatov, S. B., Lunkin, R. N. (2005). Statistics of Russian religiosity: magic numbers and ambiguous reality. Sociological Studies, 4, 35–45. (In Russ.).
Faulkner, D., De Jong, G. (2011). Religiosity in five dimensions: an empirical analysis. Sociological Research, 12, 69–76. (In Russ.).
Khlopkova, O. V. (2020). Transformation of approaches to the study of religiosity in social sciences. Man. Sotsium. Society, 2, 122–130. (In Russ.).
Huber, S., Huber, O. (2018). Religiosity Centrality Scale (CRS) / Translated from English by E. V. Prutskova, K. V. Markin. Sociology: methodology, methods, mathematical modeling (Sociology: 4M), 47, 144-171. (In Russ.).
Chesnokova, V. F. (2005). Tight path: The Process of Russian Population's Voterization at the End of the 20th Century. Moscow: Academic Project. (In Russ.).
Hervieux-Leger, D. (2015). In Search of Certainty: Paradoxes of Religiosity in Developed Modern Societies. State, Religion, Church in Russia and Abroad, 1(33), 254-268. (In Russ.).
Allport, G. W., Ross, J. M. (1967). Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5(4), 432–443.
Berger, P. L. (1974). Modern identity: Crisis and continuity. In: W. S. Dillon (Ed.), The cultural drama: Modern identities and social ferment (pp. 158-181). Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
Bullard, G. (2016). The World's Newest Major Religion: No Religion. The New Your Times. April, 22. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/2016/04/160422-atheism-agnostic-secular-nones-rising-religion.html.
Davie, G. (2006). Is Europe an Exceptional Case? The Hedgehog Review, Spring & Summer, 23-34.
Davie, G. (2004). New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective. Social Compass, 53, 73–84.
Glock, C.Y. (1962). On the Study of Religious Commitment. Religious Education, 57(4), 98–110.
Glock, C.Y. (1973). Religion in Sociological Perspective: Essays in the Empirical Study of Religion. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Co.
Glock, Y. (1962). On the Study of Religious Commitment. Religious Education, Researh Supplement, 42, 99–100.
Glock, Сh., Stark, R. (1968). The Nature of Religious Commitment. Berkley.
Hill, P. C., Hood, R. W. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Birmingham, Alabama: Religious Education Press.
Hilty, D. M., Morgan, R. L. (1985). Construct validation for the Religious Involvement Inventory: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 24(1), 75–86.
Holt, C. L., Clark, E. M., Wang, M. Q., Williams B. R., Schulz E. (2014). The Religion-Health Connection Among African Americans: What Is the Role of Social Capital? Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, (25): 1–18.
Homans, G.C. (1974). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Huber, S., Ackert, M., Scheiblich, H. (2020). Religiosität in unterschiedlichen Religionskulturen – Vergleiche auf der Basis der Centrality of Religiosity Scale. Cultura & psyché, 1(1-2), 171-185. Springer Nature Switzerland 10.1007/s43638-020-00007-3.
Joshanloo, M., Daemi, F. (2015). Self-esteem mediates the relationship between spirituality and subjective well-being in Iran. International Journal of Psychology, 50(2), 115–120.
King, M. B., Hunt, R. A. (1972). Measuring the Religious Variable: Replication. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 11(3), 240–251.
Lenski, G. (1961). The Religious Factor: A Sociological Study of Religion's Impact on Politics, Economics, And Family Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.
Machado, D. L., Turner, B. S., Trygve, E. W. (2018). Borderland Religion: Ambiguous practices of difference, hope and beyond. Routledge.
Stark, R., Glock, C.Y. (1968). American Piety: The Nature of Religious Commitment. Los Angeles, CA: Berkeley Univ. Press.
Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic Interactionism: A Social Structural Version. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Voas, D., Day, A. (2010). Recognizing Secular Christians: Toward and Unexcluded Middle in the Study of Religion. The Arda Association of Religion Data Archives Guiding Paper Series, 1-20, 115–120.
Wimberley, D.W. (1989). Religion and Role-Identity: A Structural Symbolic Interactionist Conceptualization of Religiosity. The Sociological Quarterly, 30(1), 125–142.