MAGNETIC SURVEY OF THE PERIPHERAL AREAS OF THE KURGAN TUNNUG-1 IN TUVA
Abstract
The article provides the feasibility for the using of geophysical methods, in particular, the magnetometric probing for examining the complex ritual and funeral architecture of the early Scythian kurgan Tunnug-1 and its periphery (Piy-Khemsky District of the Tuva Republic). The survey results showed that the area near close to the kurgan was used as a place of religious events and ritual burials both in the early Scythian period and by tribes living in the area in later times. As a result of the studies, subsurface local stone structures belonging to the objects of burial architecture, unevenly distributed around the near the mound territory, were discovered. The building material of stone structures has different magnetic susceptibilities, which does not prevent to reliable magnetometry localization of these archaeological objects. Areal geomagnetic surveying has proven to be an effective approach for a detailed examination of the funeral architecture, determination, and contouring of places of the religious and cult practice of the funeral memorial cycle of ancient nomads.
Downloads
References
Gryaznov M.P. Arzhan. Carskij kurgan ranneskifskogo vremeni [Arzhan – Royal Mound of the Early Scythian Time]. L., 1980. 62 p.
Sadykov T.R., Caspari Dg., Blochin E.K. Ranneskifskij kurgan Tunnug-1: rezul’taty pervyh rabot na yuzhnoj periferii pamyatnika [The Early Scythian Burial Mound Tunnug-1: Preliminary Results of the Excavation of the Southern Periphery]. Teoriya i praktika arheologicheskih issledovanij [Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research]. 2019. №1. Pp. 29–38. DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2019)1(25).-03.
Fassbinder J. Magnitometriya v arheologii – ot teorii k praktike [Magnetometry in Archaeology – from Theory to Practice] Rossijskaya arheologiya. 2019. №3. Pp. 75–91. DOI: 10.31857/S086960630005672-8.
Caspari G., Sadykov T., Blochin J., Hajdas I. Tunnug 1 (Arzhan 0) – an Early Scythian Kurgan in Tuva Republic, Russia // Archaeological Research in Asia. 2018. V. 15. P. 82–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.ara.2017.11.001.
Caspari G., Sadykov T., Blochin J., Buess M., Nieberle M., Balz T. Integrating Remote Sensing and Geophysics for Exploring Early Nomadic Funerary Architecture in the “Siberian Valley of the Kings” // Sensors. 2019. V. 19. С. 3074. P. 1–13. DOI: 10.3390/s19143074.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.
Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.
Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).



2.jpg)






