ТASHTYK SWORD

DOI_disc_logo https://doi.org/10.14258/tpai(2022)34(2).-14
Keywords: Middle Yenisei, Tashtyk culture, city of Abakan, funeral rite, chance find, iron sword

Abstract

In 1962, an iron sword entered the funds of the Khakass Museum of Local Lore. It was discovered under random circumstances in the vicinity of the Podsinee village (currently a suburb of the city of Abakan). Yu.S. Khudyakov attributed the sword to the Tashtyk culture and gave a brief description of its size. According to the classifi cation, the sword is in Group I — rhombic, type 1 — with an emphasis for the plate crosshair. An analysis of weapons rare for the Tashtyk culture made it possible to supplement its description and make a number of clarifications. The sword is forged from a strip of iron, including a triangular crosshair. Forge welding was not used, traces of processing with abrasives are not fixed. The blade is straight, at the crosshairs it tapers, the cross section of the blade is rhombic, turning into a lenticular. The handle is rectangular, the end is broken, but presumably it ended with a small hook.With a total length of 53 cm, it is close to the size of «small» swords, and in terms of blade length it meets the standards of akinak. The weight of the sword is 830 grams, the main weight falls on the hilt and crosshairs. This is a weapon of a foot warrior; due to its small size it is not effective for combat use by a mounted warrior. Testing has shown that for thrusting, the index finger is placed over the crosshair, which allows for better control of the blade. In our opinion, the sword is of imported origin.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

O.A. Mitko, Novosibirsk State University

Candidate of Sciences (History), Head of the Archaeology Sector of the Laboratory for Humanitarian Research at Novosibirsk State University

References

Volkov P. V., Skobelev S. G., Mitko O. A., Andreev O. V. Traces of Combat Use on the Blade of a Broadsword from the Burial of the Kyrgyz Burial Ground Koya-2. In: Problems of Archaeology, Ethnography, Anthropology of Siberia and Adjacent Territories Vol. XXII. Novosibirsk : Izdatel’stvo Instituta arheologii i etnografii, 2016. Pp. 257–260. (In Russ.)

Gorelik M. V. On One Variety of Eurasian Blades of the Era of the Developed Middle Ages. In: Military Business of the Peoples of Siberia and Central Asia. Issue 1. Novosibirsk : Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet, 2004. Pp. 86–101. (In Russ.)

Kartsov V. G. Materials for the Archaeology of the Krasnoyarsk Region. Krasnoyarsk : Gosudarstvennyj muzej Prienisejskogo kraya, 1929. 78 p. (In Russ.)

Kokorina Yu. G. Sword, Akinak, Dagger — Which Term to Choose? (to the problem statement). Arheologicheskie vesti = Archaeological News, 2008. No15. Рp. 75–83. (In Russ.)

Kyzlasov L. R. Tashtyk epoch in the history of the Khakass-Minusinsk basin. Moscow : Izdatel’stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 1960. 198 p. (In Russ.)

Melykova A. I. Armament of the Scythians). Moscow : Nauka, 1964. 113 p. (SAI. Issue D1–4). (In Russ.)

Mitko O. A., Skobelev S. G. Early Iron Age Sword from the Territory of the Middle Yenisei. Vestnik Novosibirskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya, filologiya = Bulletin of Novosibirsk State University. Series: History and Philology. 2021;20(7):135–143. (In Russ.)

Privalikhin V. I., Fokin S. M. New Materials on the Early Iron Age of the Northern Angara and Middle Yenisei. In: History and Culture of the Yenisei Siberia. Krasnoyarsk : Redakcionno-izdatel’skij otdel Krasnoyarskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, 2003. Pp. 14–20. (In Russ.)

Pugachenkova G. A. New about the Artistic Culture of Ancient Sogd. In: Monuments of Culture. New Discoveries. Writing. Art. Archaeology. 1983. Leningrad : Nauka, 1985. Pp. 521–531. (In Russ.)

Khazanov A. M. Essays on the Military Affairs of the Sarmatians. Moscow : Nauka, 1971, 172 p. (In Russ.)

Khudyakov Yu. S. On the Armament of the Tashtyk Warrior. In: Ancient Cultures of Altai and Western Siberia: Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1978. Pp. 164–169. (In Russ.)

Khudyakov Yu. S. Armament of Medieval Nomads of South Siberia and Central Asia. Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1986. 269 p. (In Russ.)

Published
2022-07-13
How to Cite
Mitko O. ТASHTYK SWORD // THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022. Vol. 34, № 2. P. 242-250 DOI: 10.14258/tpai(2022)34(2).-14. URL: https://journal.asu.ru/tpai/article/view/11685.
Issue
Vol 34 No 2 (2022)
Section
MUSEUM COLLECTIONS

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research is a golden publisher, as we allow self-archiving, but most importantly we are fully transparent about your rights.

Authors may present and discuss their findings ahead of publication: at biological or scientific conferences, on preprint servers, in public databases, and in blogs, wikis, tweets, and other informal communication channels.

Theory and Practice of Archaeological Research allows authors to deposit manuscripts (currently under review or those for intended submission to ABS) in non-commercial, pre-print servers such as ArXiv.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).