Аннотация
Light pollution is a modern environmental problem. The scale of light pollution is increasing yearly and is negatively affecting the functioning of terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Of the aquatic ecosystems, marine ecosystems are the most studied, while there is very little information on the effect of artificial lighting on freshwater ecosystems. Among freshwater aquatic organisms, there are relatively little data on the effect of artificial light on crustaceans and fish, while we could find no meaningful data on the effect of artificial light on molluscs are practically absent. Here we test whether different types of artificial lighting, differing in their spectra, affect the activity of the Holarctic mollusc Radix auricularia. For this, we used two light sources (with warm and cold light) and a 1-m long aquarium. We found that both light sources affect individuals of this species, but the effects of this exposure are different. Artificial lighting (depending on the spectral characteristics) can increase the activity of molluscs of this species or reduce it. In the long term, the impact on the ecosystem will depend on the type of water body where light pollution is present, where individuals of this species live, and the type of light sources.
Corresponding author: Dmitry Yu. Karnaukhov (karnauhovdmitrii@gmail.com)
Academic editor: R. Yakovlev | Received 3 November 2022 | Accepted 29 December 2022 | Published 22 December 2022
http://zoobank.org/8AFCE04E-043C-46D7-A7B9-1E5FD1A7DE6E
Citation: Karnaukhov DYu, Maslennikova MA, Ermolaeva YK, Dolinskaya EM, Biritskaya SA, Pushnica VA, Bukhaeva LB, Lavnikova AV, Golubets DI, Silow EA (2022) Locomotor activity of the Holarctic molluscs Radix auricularia (from Lake Baikal) in various light pollution conditions. Acta Biologica Sibirica 8: 831–841. https://doi.org/10.14258/abs.v8.e52
Keywords
ALAN, Artificial light at night, Lake Baikal, light sources, Radix auricularia.
Introduction
Light pollution is inappropriate and excessive artificial lighting that affects the ecosystems. Billboards, building lighting, streetlamps and highways lights are the main sources of light pollution on land (Hölker et al. 2010; Luarte et al. 2016; Ściężor 2021). With the growth of the population and urbanization, the number of lighting sources continues to increase. For example, the number of streetlamps is predicted to increase by 6% yearly (Hölker et al. 2010). The lighting of the coastline and water transport is the main source of light pollution at water bodies (Navarro-Barranco and Hughes 2015). Artificial lighting can have a variety of effects on aquatic organisms (Moore et al. 2000; Luarte et al. 2016; Duarte et al. 2019; Pulgar et al. 2019). It can affect both reproduction (Bruning et al. 2010) and behavior of fish, such as the protection of laid eggs (Foster et al. 2016). Light pollution can change the composition of aquatic communities (Davies et al. 2012) and slow down the locomotor activity of daphnia at night (Moore et al. 2000). In addition, it affects the locomotor activity and growth rate of some organisms (Luarte et al. 2016). Molluscs is one of the numerous groups of aquatic organisms, ranked second in species diversity after arthropods (Giribet et al. 2006). However, scanty data is available on the effect of light pollution on molluscs. There are data on the effect of different ranges of the light spectrum on the fertility of Lymnaea acuminata (Kumar et al. 2017) and the effect of prolonged exposure to light on the shadow reflex of Radix auricularia (Hussein et al. 2021). This group of aquatic organisms is sensitive to anthropogenic impact, making many gastropods model objects of bioindication (Bouchet et al. 2005; Akindele et al. 2019; Chukaeva and Petrov 2022).
Nearly 180 species of molluscs have been recorded in Lake Baikal, of which 82% are gastropods. More than 60% of gastropods are endemic to the lake (Kulikova et al. 2007; Zhuykova 2020; Schniebs et al. 2022), and the peak of the total diversity of most endemic gastropods is observed at depths of 5–20 m (Sitnikova 2006). Unlike some Baikal molluscs, the upper part of the littoral (0-5 m) is inhabited by a widespread Holarctic species such as Radix auricularia (Linnaeus, 1758) (Aksenova 2017). The maximum habitat depth of this species in Lake Baikal is 30 meters (Schniebs et al. 2022). Previous studies show that the littoral part of Lake Baikal is exposed to light pollution (Karnaukhov et al. 2021), making the species of molluscs potentially susceptible to light pollution.
Various sources of artificial lighting (LED and halogen lamps) have been installed along with Lake Baikal; these sources can have different effects on aquatic organisms (Navarro-Barranco et al. 2015). Thus, studying the effect of lighting on such a widespread species such as R. auricularia is actual. This study aims to investigate whether the reaction of R. auricularia to artificial lighting depends on its spectral characteristics.
Materials and methods
Molluscs (shell size: 16.4±0.3 mm) were collected on September 15, 2021, in the southern part of Lake Baikal near Bolshiye Koty village (51°54'11.2"N 105°04'12.8"E; there is no lighting in this place). Two weeks before the experiment, the individuals were acclimated under the following conditions (t = 8 0C, daylight hours - 8L(5000 lx):16D).
The experiment began at the same time (beginning at 10 a.m.) to exclude the influence of circadian rhythms or kinesis. In addition, the character of the individual’s movement was noted for the same purpose. We used 4 lighting variants (daylight 58000 lx, darkness 0 lx, warm yellow light with a gradient from 0.3 to 33 lx and cold light with a similar gradient for the experiment (Near the coastline of Lake Baikal, light pollution from 1.2 to 50 lux is currently observed in some areas.). For lighting variants with warm and cold light, a light source (led video light CN-20FC: 5600K-3200K) was installed above the aquarium (30 cm), to create an illumination gradient along its length (Fig. 1). The amount of emitted light was measured using a luxmeter (CEM DT – 8809A), and a fibre-optic spectrometer QE Pro (OceanOptics, USA) was used to measure the spectral characteristics of the light source.
The experimental setup was an aquarium (length 100 × width 10 × height 10 cm). A lined sheet was placed under the aquarium with a distance of 1 cm between the lines. In total, we used 30 individuals of R. auricularia. At the beginning of the experiments, all 30 individuals were planted at the aquarium, and the time was recorded. After 15 minutes, the distance travelled by the molluscs was recorded on a lined sheet of paper. For each lighting variant, the molluscs were planted 5 times on one side and 5 times on the opposite side. With an additional source of illumination, the molluscs were planted 5 times at the least illuminated side and 5 times at the most illuminated side (Fig. 1). There were 5 minutes between side changes. As an additional control, a video camera with night vision mode was used.
The control group also consisted of 30 individuals. This group was kept and acclimated under the same conditions. The values of locomotor activity obtained using the control group were identical to the values of day and night during the experiment.
Statistical analysis was conducted in the programs Past 3.x and R. The data were first checked for normal distribution using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Since the data turned out to be nonparametric, we used the Dunn's post hoc test (Table 1). However, it should be noted that the combination of the Kruskal-Wallis test with the Mann-Whitney U-test with Bonferroni correction showed similar results.
Day | Night | Warm light | Cold light | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Right side | Left side | Right side | Left side | Right side | Left side | Right side | ||
Day | Left side | 0.5539 | 7.55E-12 | 6.25E-12 | 0.598 | 1.16E-06 | 0.9621 | 0.03909 |
Right side | 5.97E-14 | 4.86E-14 | 0.893 | 3.29E-08 | 0.539 | 0.1611 | ||
Night | Left side | 0.9751 | 1.67E-17 | 0.02199 | 1.71E-15 | 7.94E-25 | ||
Right side | 1.27E-17 | 0.02025 | 1.33E-15 | 5.74E-25 | ||||
Warm light | Left side | 4.83E-10 | 0.5795 | 0.07615 | ||||
Right side | 1.42E-08 | 1.26E-15 | ||||||
Cold light | Left side | 0.01994 |
Results and discussion
After evaluating molluscs activity, no difference was observed between the right and left sides of the aquarium in daylight and without light (Fig. 2). Therefore, the side of the aquarium did not influence the results of the experiments. At the same time, we observe that the molluscs move more actively in the no-light mode. In daylight, their activity is extremely low. The warm light (despite the difference in illumination at both ends of the aquarium) did not affect the locomotion of the molluscs, which remained at a low level, just like in daylight. When using cold light, we observe the relatively low activity of molluscs from the most illuminated end of the aquarium and the highest activity from the opposite side, while movement, in this case, is directed towards the light source.
Previous studies have repeatedly noted a positive reaction of some members of the Lymnaeidae family, namely Radix peregra (Müller, 1774) (Schepeleva 2013) and Lymnaea stagnalis (Linnaeus, 1758) (Van Duivenboden 1982), to artificial lighting. A similar reaction was also noted for R. auricularia (Rossetti and Cabanac 2006). However, these studies considered the intensity of the illumination, not its spectrum. In our study, we paid more attention to the spectrum of the light sources, revealing that both warm and cold light affect the activity of this species; but the lighting effects on molluscs is different. When the mollusc is placed on the side of the aquarium with a low intensity of cold light, it begins to actively move on the opposite side. When the intensity is higher, the mollusc demonstrates a slight increase in its motor activity (in comparison with warm light), which may indicate a preference for a higher intensity of artificial illumination of this spectrum (Rossetti and Cabanac 2006). When using warm light, activity remains at a low level both near the illuminated side and on the opposite side.
Lake Baikal is a reservoir with high water transparency (maximum 40 m) (Kozhov 1963; Kozhova and Izmesteva 1998), and since these species live at a depth of 0-30 meters, both long and short waves of visible light (Hunt, 1996) can affect them. However, the form of this impact will depend on the light sources close to the lake shoreline. A similar occurrence is true for very shallow water bodies, where representatives of this species can also be found.
Lymnaeid snails can serve as food for fish (Ivlev 1955), and if R. auricularia is exposed to cold light, these individuals will concentrate in an illuminated place, which will make the mollusc potentially visible to fish, which are actively attracted by artificial light in Lake Baikal (Takhteev et al. 2019). Furthermore, the low mineral content (120 mg/l) of Baikal water can make the shell of molluscs fragile. This will facilitate the fish predation on molluscs. In warm light, a sudden appearance of a boat, (for example, when a boat with illumination from below appears in a given place) in a local place where there is a large population of molluscs, will, probably, lead to a sharp decrease in the motor activity of molluscs, making them more vulnerable to potential predators. Evidence also shows that the accumulation of snails around light sources can increase the risk of attack by predators (Hussein et al. 2021). Molluscs have neocular light receptors that are responsible for behavioural responses such as a shadow reflex, which is a defensive response to sudden falls in light, triggered by a shadow from a predator (Ramirez et al. 2011 г.). Consequently, prolonged exposure to light can cause R. auricularia to terminate the shadow reflex due to a large number of false positives (Hussein et al. 2021).
Exposure to longer photoperiods (than under natural lighting conditions) increases the fertility of the Lymnaeidae. For example, L. stagnalis individuals exposed to long daylight hours (16L:8D) produce 2-3 times more eggs than individuals under normal light conditions (12L:12D) (Ter Maat et al. 2007). With prolonged light pollution, as well as the absence of potential predators, namely large fish (this is possible in small water bodies), these factors can lead to an increase in population density, and then R. auricularia, as a species with a wide ecological valence, can begin to displace more vulnerable species. However, we are talking only if the increase in the photoperiod occurs due to artificial light sources with cold light, since it was shown that longer waves of visible light lead to the decrease in the fertility of representatives of this family (Kumar, Singh and Singh 2016). In our case, warm light differs from cold light precisely in that the peak of longer wavelengths of visible light is higher than that of shorter ones. In contrast, cold light has a higher peak in shorter wavelengths of visible light than longer wavelengths (Fig. 1).
At the moment, in the settlements on the shores of Lake Baikal, old incandescent lamps are being replaced with new LED lamps (or has it already happened). As we said earlier, this energy-saving trend may have a greater impact on organisms than older lamps. The Listvenichny and Kultuk bays are more affected by light pollution in Lake Baikal. However, an increase in the tourist load from the Republic of Buryatia could potentially increase the number of problem areas of the coastline.
Conclusion
Gastropods are a suitable group of animals for studying potential impacts on ecosystems, and the effects of light pollution (Manríquez et al. 2019; Manríquez et al. 2021). Exposure to light pollution can make R. auricularia more vulnerable to potential predators, dull protective shadow reflex. Depending on the size of the reservoir (and the presence or absence of predators), exposure to light pollution can increase their population growth, which can lead to the displacement of other species. Such behavioural changes can disrupt interspecies interactions and the functioning of the ecosystem (Underwood, Davies and Queirós 2017). In the latter case, special attention should be paid to a combination of some factors. An increase in surface water temperature or an excessive supply of organic matter from the coastline can actively contribute to the penetration of invasive species (Timoshkin 2001). These factors, when combined with light pollution, can increase the impact on the ecosystem. From our research, the intensity of artificial lighting is of particular importance and its spectrum. In future studies, it is worth paying attention to the spectral characteristics of light sources located near the shoreline of the reservoir.
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the Project of Russian Ministry of Science and Education N FZZE-2020-0026.
The author declare that they have no conflict of interest. All authors gave their consent to participate in this manuscript. All authors approve its publication.
The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Akindele EO, Ehlers SM, Koop JHE (2019) First empirical study of freshwater microplastics in West Africa using gastropods from Nigeria as bioindicators. Limnologica 78:125708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.limno.2019.125708
Aksenova O, Vinarski M, Bolotov I, Kondakov A, Bespalaya Yu, Tomilova A, Paltser I, Gofarov M (2017) Two Radix spp. (Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) endemic to thermal springs around Lake Baikal represent ecotypes of the widespread Radix auricularia. Journal of zoological systematics and evolutionary research 55(4):298-309. https://doi.org/10.1111/jzs.12174
Bouchet P, Rocroi JP, Frýda J, Hausdorf B, Ponder W, Valdés Á and Warén A (2005) Classification and Nomenclator of Gastropod Families. Malacologia 47:1-368.
Bruning A, Hölker F, Wolter C (2011) Artificial light at night: implications for early life stages development in four temperate freshwater fish species. Aquatic Sciences73(1):143-152.
Chukaeva M, Petrov D (2022) Assessment and analysis of metal bioaccumulation in freshwater gastropods of urban river habitats, Saint Petersburg (Russia). Environmental Science and Pollution Research https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21955-8
Davies TW, Bennie J, Gaston KJ (2012) Street lighting changes the composition of invertebrate communities. Biology Letters 8(5):764–767.
Duarte C, Quintanilla-Ahumada D, Anguita C, Manríquez PH, Widdicombe S, Pulgar J, Silva-Rodríguez EA, Miranda C, Manríquez K, Quijón PA (2019) Artificial light pollution at night (ALAN) disrupts the distribution and circadian rhythm of a sandy beach isopod. Environmental Pollution248:565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.037
Foster JG, Algera DA, Brownscombe JW, Zolderdo AJ and Cooke SJ (2016) Consequences of different types of littoral zone light pollution on the parental care behaviour of a freshwater teleost fish. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution 227(11):404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3106-6
Giribet G, Okusu A, Lindgren AR, Huff SW, Schrödl M, Nishiguchi MK (2006) Evidence for a clade composed of molluscs with serially repeated structures: monoplacophorans are related to chitons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103(20):7723-7728.
Hölker F, Moss T, Griefahn B, Kloas W, Voigt CC, Henckel D, Hänel A, Kappeler PM, Völker S, Schwope A, Franke S, Uhrlandt D, Fischer J, Klenke R, Wolter C and K. Tockner (2010) The dark side of light: a transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecology and Society, 15(4):13.
Hunt DM, Fitzgibbon J, Slobodyanyuk SJ, Bowmakers JK (1996) Spectral tuning and molecular evolution of rod visual pigments in the species flock of cottoid fish in Lake Baikal. Vision research, 36(9):1217-1224.
Hussein AA, Bloem E, Fodor I, Baz ES, Tadros MM, Soliman MF, El-Shenawy NS, Koene JM (2021) Slowly seeing the light: an integrative review on ecological light pollution as a potential threat for mollusks. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28(5):5036-5048.
Ivlev VS (1955) Experimental ecology of fish nutrition. Publishing house "Pishchepromizdat", Moscow.
Karnaukhov D, Teplykh M, Dolinskaya E, Biritskaya S, Ermolaeva Y, Pushnica V, Kuznetsova I, Okholina A, Bukhaeva L, Silow E (2021) Light pollution affects the coastal zone of Lake Baikal. Limnological Review 21(3):165-168. https://doi.org/10.2478/limre-2021-0015
Kozhova O and Izmesteva L (1998) Lake Baikal: Evolution and biodiversity. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden.
Kozhov M (1963) Lake Baikal and its life. W. Junk Publishers, Hague.
Kulikova NN, Maksimova NV, Suturin AN, Paradina LF, Sitnikova TYa, Timoshkin OA, Saibatalova EV, Khanaev IV (2007) Biogeochemical characteristics of dominant gastropod species from the stony littoral of southern Baikal Geochemistry International 45(5):478-489.
Kumar N, Singh DK, Singh VK (2016) Chlorophyllin bait formulation and exposure to different spectrum of visible light on the reproduction of infected/uninfected snail Lymnaea acuminata. Scientifica 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/9795178
Kumar N, Singh DK, Singh VK (2017) Reproductive pattern of Lymnaea acuminata in different spectral band of visible light and natural sunlight. Zoological Studies 4(3):37-43.
Luarte T, Bonta CC, Silva-Rodriguez EA, Quijón PA, Miranda C, Farias AA, Duarte C (2016) Light pollution reduces activity, food consumption and growth rates in a sandy beach invertebrate. Environmental Pollution 218:1147-1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.08.068
Manríquez PH, Jara ME, Diaz MI, Quijón PA, Widdicombe S, Pulgar JM, Manríquez K, Quintanilla-Ahumada D, Duarte C (2019) Artificial light pollution influences behavioral and physiological traits in a keystone predator species, Concholepas concholepas. Science of The Total Environment661:543-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.157
Manríquez PH, Jara ME, González CP, Seguel M, Quijón PA, Widdicombe S, Pulgar JM, Quintanilla-Ahumada D, Anguita C, Duarte C (2021) Effects of artificial light at night and predator cues on foraging and predator avoidance in the keystone inshore mollusc Concholepas concholepas. Environmental Pollution280:116895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116895
Moore MV, Pierce SM, Walsh HM, Kvalvik SK, Lim JD (2000) Urban light pollution alters the diel vertical migration of Daphnia. Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie: Verhandlungen 27(2):779-782.
Navarro-Barranco C and Hughes LE (2015) Effects of light pollution on the emergent fauna of shallow marine ecosystems: Amphipods as a case study. Marine Pollution Bulletin 94:235-240.
Pulgar J, Zeballos D, Vargas J, Aldana M, Manriquez PH, Manriquez K, Quijón PA, Widdicombe S, Anguita C, Quintanilla D, Duarte C (2019) Endogenous cycles, activity patterns and energy expenditure of an intertidal fish is modified by artificial light pollution at night (ALAN). Environmental Pollution 244:361-366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.10.063
Ramirez MD, Speiser DI, Pankey MS, Oakley TH (2011) Understanding the dermal light sense in the context of integrative photoreceptor cell biology. Visual Neuroscience 28:265-279.
Rossetti Y and Cabanac M (2006) Light versus temperature: An intersensitivity conflict in a gastropod (Lymnaea auricularia). Journal of Thermal Biology 31(6):514-520.
Schepeleva IP (2013) The spectral sensitivity of the eye of a gastropod pulmonate mollusc Radix peregra (Müller, 1774) (Basommatophora, Lymnaeidae). Ruthenica, Russian Malacological Journal 23(2):167-170.
Sitnikova TY (2006) Endemic gastropod distribution in Baikal. Hydrobiologia 568:207-211.
Schniebs K, Sitnikova TY, Vinarski MV, Müller A, Khanaev IV, Hundsdoerfer AK (2022) Morphological and Genetic Variability in Radix auricularia (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Lymnaeidae) of Lake Baikal, Siberia: The Story of an Unfinished Invasion into the Ancient Deepest Lake. Diversity 14:527. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14070527
Ściężor T (2021) Effect of Street Lighting on the Urban and Rural Night-Time Radiance and the Brightness of the Night Sky. Remote sensing13(9):1654. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13091654
Takhteev VV, Karnaukhov DYu, Govorukhina EB, Misharin AS (2019) Diel Vertical Migrations of Hydrobionts in the Coastal Area of Lake Baikal. Inland Water Biology 12(2):178-189. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995082919020147
Ter Maat A, Zonneveld C, De Visser JAG, Jansen RF, Montagne-Wajer K, Koene JM (2007) Food intake, growth, and reproduction as affected by day length and food availability in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. American Malacological Bulletin 23(1):113-120.
Timoshkin OA (2001) Lake Baikal: diversity of fauna, the problem of its immiscibility and origin, ecology and "exotic" communities. Index of Animal Species Inhabiting Lake Baikal and Its Catchment Area: Vol. 1: Lake Baikal, Book 1. Nauka, Novosibirsk.
Underwood CN, Davies TW, Queirós AM (2017) Artificial light at night alters trophic interactions of intertidal invertebrates. Journal of Animal Ecology, 86(4):781-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.12670
Van Duivenboden YA (1982) Non-ocular photoreceptors and photo-orientation in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis (L.). Journal of comparative physiology 149(3):363-368.
Zhuykova NS (2020) Gastropods of the family Lymnaeidae (Pulmonata) in the littoral zone and Spirogyra blooms from the northwest of Lake Baikal. Limnology and Freshwater Biology, 4:767-768.