DYNAMICS OF THE ACCUMULATION OF FRUCTOSE-CONTAINING CARBOHYDRATES IN THE UN-DERGROUND ORGANS OF PLANTS FROM DIFFERENT FAMILIES

UDC 615.322+581.192

  • Evgenia Samuilovna Vasfilova Russian Academy of Scienses, Ural Branch: Institute Botanic Garden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5892-2292 Email: euvas@mail.ru
  • Tat'yana Andreyevna Vorob'eva Russian Academy of Scienses, Ural Branch: Institute Botanic Garden Email: aroma.botsad@mail.ru
Keywords: fructose-containing carbohydrates, low molecular weight glucofructans, high molecular weight glucofructans, inulin

Abstract

Fructose-containing carbohydrates (fructans) are sources of reserve nutrients for plants and ensure their adaptation to stressful environmental influences. We studied variability of content of these compounds during growing season. In species of Dicotyledonous (Echinacea pallida, Tussilago farfara (Asteraceae), Lithospermum officinale, Symphytum officinale (Boraginaceae)) content of glucofructans during the period of active growth was low, a significant part of them were low molecular weight compounds. By the end of growing season polymerization index rised and high molecular weight glucofructans prevailed. The separation in time of processes of intensive growth and accumulation of fructans was observed.

For species of Allium (Monocotyledonous), maximum content of glucofructans was observed during the period of flowering and fruiting. In species of bulbous life form (A. caeruleum, A. aflatunense), accumulation of high molecular weight glucofructans proceeded simultaneously with a period of intensive growth and budding, polymerization index increased from the regrowth and reached a maximum by the time of flowering. In species of bulbous-rhizomatous life form (A. obliquum, A. ledebourianum, A. victorialis), content of glucofructans did not change during intensive growth or fell. The polymerization index decreased during this period, but reached its maximum during flowering and fruiting.

Generative individuals of a number of species contained less low molecular weight glucofructans than virginal ones, but they had a greater amount of high molecular weight glucofructans and an increased polymerization index. These age states did not differ in the sum of glucofructans.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Evgenia Samuilovna Vasfilova, Russian Academy of Scienses, Ural Branch: Institute Botanic Garden

кандидат биологических наук, доцент, старший научный сотрудник лаборатории интродукции травянистых растений

Tat'yana Andreyevna Vorob'eva, Russian Academy of Scienses, Ural Branch: Institute Botanic Garden

ведущий инженер лаборатории интродукции травянистых растений

References

Hendry G.A.F. New Phytologist, 1993, vol. 123, no. 1, pp. 3–14. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb04525.x.

Valluru R., Van den Ende W. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 2905–2916. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ern164.

Van den Ende W. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2013, vol. 4, article 247. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00247.

Machado de Carvalcho M.A., Dietrich S.M.C. New phytologist, 1992, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 735–740. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03784.x.

dos Santos C.S., Abraão C.F., de Moraes M.G. Acta Botanica Brasilica, 2018, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 70–79. DOI: 10.1590/0102-33062017abb0214.

Wilson R.G., Kachman S.D., Martin A.R. Weed Science, 2001, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 150–155. DOI: 10.1614/0043-1745(2001)049[0150:SCIGFS]2.0.CO;2.

Vijn I., Smeekens S. Plant Physiology, 1999, vol. 120, no. 2, pp. 351–360. DOI: 10.1104/pp.120.2.351.

Bizzarri M., Delledonne M., Ferrarini A., Tononi P., Zago E., Vittori D., Damiani F., Paolocci F. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, vol. 11, article 101. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00101.

Pollock C.J. New Phytologist, 1986, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb00629.x.

Livingston D.P. III, Hincha D.K., Heyer A.G. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 2009, vol. 66, no. 13, pp. 2007–2023. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-009-0002-x.

Marx S.P., Nösberger J., Frehner M. New phytologist, 1997, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 267–277. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.1997.00641.x.

Stolze A., Wanke A., van Deenen N., Geyer R., Prufer D., Schuze Gronover C. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 740–753. DOI: 10.1111/pbi.12672.

Jefford T.G., Edelman J. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1963, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 56–62. DOI: 10.1093/jxb/14.1.56.

van Arkel J., Vergauwen R., Sévenier R., Hakkert J.C., van Laere A., Bouwmeester H.J., Koops A.J., van der Meer I.M. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2012, vol. 169, no. 15, pp. 1520–1529. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2012.06.005.

Van den Ende W., Michiels A., Van Wonterghem D., Vergauwen R., Van Laere A. Plant Physiology, 2000, vol. 123, pp. 71–80. DOI: 10.1104/pp.123.1.71.

D'yakova N.A., Slivkin A.I., Gaponov S.P., Mikhaylovskaya I.Yu. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Khimiya. Biologiya. Farmatsiya, 2016, no. 4, pp. 133–136. (in Russ.).

Van den Ende W., Mintiens A., Speleers H., Onuoha A.A., Van Laere A. New phytologist, 1996, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 555–563. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1996.tb01874.x.

Itaya N.M., Buckeridge M.S, Figueiredo-Ribeiro R.C.L. New Phytologist, 1997, vol. 136, pp. 53–60. DOI: 10.1111/J.1469-8137.1997.TB04730.X.

Hendry G.A.F. New Phytologist, 1987, vol. 106, pp. 201–216. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04690.x.

The Plant List (2013). Version 1.1. URL: http://www.theplantlist.org.

WFO (2021): World Flora Online. URL: http://www.worldfloraonline.org/search.

Olennikov D.N., Tankhayeva L.M. Khimiya rastitel'nogo syr'ya, 2008, no. 1, pp. 87–93. (in Russ.).

Saengkanuk A., Nuchadomrong S., Jogloy S., Patanothai A., Srijaranai S. European food research & technology, 2011, vol. 233, no. 4, pp. 609–616.

Salinas C., Handford M., Pauly M., Dupree P., Cardemil L. PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 1–24. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159819.

Archbold H.K. New Phytologist, 1940, vol. 39, pp. 185–219. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1940.tb07132.x.

Pollock C.J., Jones T. New Phytologist, 1979, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 9–15. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1979.tb00720.x.

Shiomi N. New phytologist, 1992, vol. 122, no. 3, pp. 421–432. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb00069.x.

Steen E., Larsson K. New phytoogistl, 1986, vol. 104, pp. 339–346. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1986.tb02901.x.

Cheremushkina V.A. Biologiya lukov Yevrazii. [Biology of Eurasian onions]. Novosibirsk, 2004, 280 p. (in Russ.).

González-Cruz L., Jaramillo-Flores M.E., Bernardino-Nicanor A., Mora-Escobedo R. African Journal of Biotechnolo-gy, 2011, vol. 10(71), pp. 15911–15920. DOI: 10.5897/AJB11.2254.

Arrizon J., Morel S., Gschaedler A., Monsan P. Food Chemistry, 2010, vol. 122, no. 1, pp. 123–130. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2010.02.028.

Published
2022-03-10
How to Cite
1. Vasfilova E. S., Vorob’eva T. A. DYNAMICS OF THE ACCUMULATION OF FRUCTOSE-CONTAINING CARBOHYDRATES IN THE UN-DERGROUND ORGANS OF PLANTS FROM DIFFERENT FAMILIES // chemistry of plant raw material, 2022. № 1. P. 71-80. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/cw/article/view/10140.
Section
Biopolymers of plants