THE EFFECT OF GROWING CONDITIONS ON THE QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS OF CHLORELLA VULGARIS

UDC 636.086.783

  • Alena Andreyevna Bogdanova Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology» http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6636-9287 Email: bogdanova.ale@gmail.com
  • Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Flerova Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology»; P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9745-6746 Email: katarinum@mail.ru
  • Aleksandra Aleksandrovna Payuta Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology» http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0478-4709 Email: a.payuta@mail.ru
Keywords: microalgae, nutrient medium, electrostatic field, biochemical composition, biotechnology

Abstract

The complex effect of two factors (the optimum ratio of nutrients of the medium and the electrostatic field) on the qualitative and quantitative indicators of Chlorella vulgaris was investigated. It is shown that the use of a medium with optimal concentrations of mineral substances and an electrostatic field with a voltage of 15 kV and an exposure time of 72 hours has a positive effect on growth rates, the size of microalgae cells and their viability, contributes to obtaining a culture with a density of 50 mln cells / ml 18 hours faster in comparison with the cultivation of generally accepted methods. It has been established that when two factors are influences on the cells of the Chlorella a mutagenic effect is not observed. Analysis of the microalgae culture grown under the influence of the studied factors showed that its chemical composition was consistent and with several indicators exceeded that of chlorella cultivation according to classical technologies. It was revealed that the activity of catalase and superoxide dismutase of microalgae grown in optimal conditions of the nutrient medium and the electrostatic field, significantly exceeded similar values of Chlorella vulgaris, which was not subjected to electrostatic stimulation. The high activity of the studied enzymes in Chlorella cells is shown in comparison with higher plants – components of bio-antioxidant preparations, such as Amaranthus paniculatus L. and Nicotiana tabacum L. According to the results of the toxicological study the absence of the content in Chlorella of the main poisonous substances for body animals and humans (mercury, arsenic) has been established. As a result of the research, it was proposed to use the established optimal parameters of both factors in the cultivation of C. vulgaris.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Alena Andreyevna Bogdanova, Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology»

кандидат сельскохозяйственных наук, старший научный сотрудник отдела технологий животноводства

Ekaterina Aleksandrovna Flerova, Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology»; P.G. Demidov Yaroslavl State University

кандидат биологических наук, доцент, ведущий научный сотрудник отдела технологий животноводства, профессор кафедры физиологии человека и животных

 

Aleksandra Aleksandrovna Payuta, Yaroslavl Scientific Research Institute of livestock breeding and forage production - Federal State Budget Scientific Insti-tution «Federal Williams Research Center of Forage Production and Agroecology»

научный сотрудник отдела технологий животноводства

References

Spolaore P., Joannis-Cassan C., Duran E., Isambert A. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2006, vol. 101, is-sue 2, pр. 87–96. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.101.87.

Borowitzka M.A. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2013, vol. 25, issue 3, pр. 743–756.

DOI: 10.1007/s10811-013-9983-9.

Wijffels R.H., Kruse O., Hellingwerf K.J. Current opinion in biotechnology, 2013, vol. 24, issue 3, pр. 405–413. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.04.004.

Bogdanova A.A., Flerova E.A. Regulatory Mechanisms in Biosystems, 2018, vol .9, issue 2, pр. 244–249. DOI: 10.15421/021836.

Sal'nikova M.Ya. Khlorella – novyy vid korma [Chlorella is a new type of food], Moskva, 1977, 96 s. (in Russ).

Bishop W.M., Zubeck H.M. J. Nutr. Food. Sci., 2012, vol. 2, issue 5, pр. 1–6. DOI: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000147

Markou G., Nerantzis E. Biotechnology advances, 2013, vol. 31, issue 8, pр. 1532–1542. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.07.011.

Oh S.T., Zheng L., Kwon H.J., Choo Y.K., Lee K.W., Kang C.W., An B.K. Asian-Australasian journal of animal sci-ences, 2015, vol. 28(1), pр. 95–101. DOI: 10.5713/ajas.14.0473.

Jorquera O., Kiperstok A., Sales E.A., Embirucu M., Ghirardi M.L. Bioresource technology, 2010, vol. 101, issue 4, pр. 1406–1413. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.09.038.

Wong Y.K., Ho K.C., Tsang Y.F., Wang L., Yung K.K.L. Water Environment Research, 2016, vol. 88, issue 1, pр. 40–46. DOI: 10.2175/106143015X14362865227553.

Bodnar O.I., Burega N.V., Palchyk A.O., Viniarska H.B., Grubinko V.V. Biotechnologia Acta, 2016, vol. 9, no. 4, pр. 42–49. DOI: 10.15407/biotech9.04.042.

Fan Z., Qin L., Zheng W., Meng Q., Shen C., Zhang G. Bioresource technology, 2018, vol. 269, pp. 134–142. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.08.093.

Suthar S., Verma R. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2018, vol. 113, pp. 141–148. DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2017.09.018.

Glushchenko N.A. Vestnik Novgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Yaroslava Mudrogo, 2013, no. 71, vol. 2, pp. 36–40. (in Russ.)

Gusbeth C.A., Eing C., Göttel M., Frey W. Abstracts IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science (ICOPS), 2013, San Francisco, CA, pр. 1–1. DOI: 10.1109/PLASMA.2013.6633325.

Nezammahalleh H., Ghanati F., Adams II T. A., Nosrati M., Shojaosadati S. A. Bioresource technology, 2016, vol. 218, pр. 700–711. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.018.

Smart K.A., Chambers K.M., Lambert I., Jenkins C., Smart C.A. Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, 1999, vol. 57, issue 1, pр. 18–23. DOI: 10.1094/ASBCJ-57-0018.

Shmigel' V.V., Flerova E.A., Bogdanova A.A., Suhovskij N.S., Figaro A.L., Kovaleva M.I. Mezhdunarodnyy tekhni-ko-ekonomicheskiy zhurnal, 2015. no. 1, pp. 64–68. (in Russ.)

Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists / ed. K. Helrich, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, 1990, vol. 1, 800 р.

Chevari S., Chaba I., Sekey Y. Laboratornoye delo, 1985, no. 11, pp. 678–680. (in Russ.)

Korolyuk M.A., Ivanova L.K., Mayorova I.G., Tokareva V.A. Klinicheskaya laboratornaya diagnostika, 1988, no. 4, pp. 44–47. (in Russ.)

Tapiero H., Tew K.D. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2003, vol. 57, issue 9, pp. 399–411. DOI: 10.1016/S0753-3322(03)00081-7.

Prashanth L., Kattapagari K.K., Chitturi R.T., Baddam V.R.R., Prasad L.K. Journal of Dr. NTR university of health sci-ences, 2015, vol. 4, issue 2, pр. 75–85. DOI: 10.4103/2277-8632.158577.

Kim S.J., Han D., Park M.H., Rhee J.S. Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry, 1994, vol. 58, issue 12, pр. 2263–2265. DOI: 10.1271/bbb.58.2263.

Martínez-Álvarez R.M., Morales A.E., Sanz A. Reviews in Fish Biology and fisheries, 2005, vol. 15, issue 1-2, pр. 75–88. DOI: 10.1007/s11160-005-7846-4.

Rodriguez C., Mayo J.C., Sainz R.M., Antolín I., Herrera F., Martín V., Reiter R.J. Journal of pineal research, 2004, vol. 36, issue 1, pр. 1–9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1600-079X.2003.00092.x.

Xue Y.F., Liu Z.P. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2008, vol. 55, issue 6, pр. 776–781. DOI: 10.1134/S102144370806006X.

Lv J.M., Cheng L.H., Xu X.H., Zhang L., Chen H.L. Bioresource technology, 2010, vol. 101, issue 17, pр. 6797–6804. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.03.120.

Yeh K.L., Chang J.S. Bioresource technology, 2012, vol. 105, pр. 120–127. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.11.103.

Mandalam R.K., Palsson B. Biotechnology and bioengineering, 1998, vol. 59, issue 5, pр. 605–611. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980905)59:5<605::AID-BIT11>3.0.CO;2-8.

Abou-El-Souod G.W., Hassan L.H., Morsy E.M. Journal of American Science, 2016, vol. 12, issue 6, pр. 86–95. DOI: 10.7537/marsjas120616.11.

Patent 2558300 (RU). 2015. (in Russ.)

Silve A., Leray I., Poignard C., Mir L.M. Scientific reports, 2016, vol. 6, no. 19957. DOI: 10.1038/srep19957.

Hunt R., Zavalin A., Bhatnagar A., Chinnasamy S., Das K. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2009, vol. 10, issue 10, pp. 4515–4558. DOI: 10.3390/ijms10104515.

Cha K.H., Lee J.Y., Song D.G., Kim S.M., Lee D.U., Jeon J.Y., Pan C.H. Journal of agricultural and food chemistry, 2011, vol. 59, issue 16, pр. 8670–8674. DOI: 10.1021/jf2019243.

Bamba B.S.B., Lozano P., Adjé F., Ouattara A., Vian M.A., Tranchant C., Lozano Y. Applied biochemistry and bio-technology, 2015, vol. 177, issue 2, pр. 389–406. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-015-1751-7.

Sreelatha S., Dinesh E., Uma C. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2012, vol. 13, issue 6, pр. 2775–2780. DOI: 10.7314 / APJCP.2012.13.6.2775.

Popov V., Antipina O., Trunova T. Scientific Works of the Lithuanian, Institute of Horticulture and Lithuanian Univer-sity of Agriculture Sodininkyste Ir Daržininkyste, 2008, vol. 27, issue 2, pр. 121–127.

Published
2019-12-27
How to Cite
1. Bogdanova A. A., Flerova E. A., Payuta A. A. THE EFFECT OF GROWING CONDITIONS ON THE QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE INDICATORS OF CHLORELLA VULGARIS // chemistry of plant raw material, 2019. № 4. P. 293-304. URL: http://journal.asu.ru/cw/article/view/5130.
Section
Biotechnology