THE STUDY OF SWEET POTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS (L.) LAM.) AND ITS PROCESSED PRODUCTS INTO STARCH

UDC 633.492

  • Vladimir Georgievich Goldstein All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2042-0681 Email: 6919486@mail.ru
  • Anastasia Vladimirovna Semenova All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0905-0111 Email: semnast97@mail.ru
  • Anastasia Alekseevna Morozova All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1937-3539 Email: iknowwhereibelong@gmail.com
  • Luybov Aleksandrovna Wasserman Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1337-3247 Email: lwasserma@mail.ru
Keywords: sweet potato, dry matter (DM), phosphorus, calcium, starch, reducing sugars, processing

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the chemical composition of sweet potatoes and the possibility of their processing. The qualitative characteristics of ten samples of sweet potato tubers grown in the Moscow region on the basis of Russian Potato Research Centre were studied by authors. The mass fraction of starch meets the criteria of industrial processing was determined only for three samples: Purple 1, Sukhumi and Japanese. These samples had the lowest mass fraction of reducing sugars (no more than 6% of the tuber mass). The starch extracted from their tubers contains more than 90% amylopectin. As a result of sweet potato processing, the highest starch yield (24.5%) was established for the sample Puprle 1. The samples LA, Manchurian and Vinnickiy pink with low starch content (5–8.5%) are especially interesting as table varieties. The samples Covington, LА, Pobeda-100 and Brazilian showed high values (more than 70 mg/100 g) for both phosphorus and calcium content. However, the optimal dietary ratio of these macroelements (1.5 : 1.0) was established for the samples Sukhumi and Japanese. The correlations between the mass fraction of dry matter and starch (r=0.96), dry matter and phosphorus (r=-0.87), starch and phosphorus (r=-0.80) in sweet potato were identified and mathematically expressed. The increase of the phosphorus content in tubers is accompanied by the decrease of the dry matter content and the starch content, and at the same time the increase of the reducing sugars content. The amylopectin starch is the most interesting sweet potato processing product, because it can be successfully used in the food industry as a thickener and stabilizer, and for obtaining of modified starches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Vladimir Georgievich Goldstein, All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre

candidate of Technical Sciences, Leading Researcher, Head of the Department of Deep Processing of Starch-Containing Raw Materials

Anastasia Vladimirovna Semenova, All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre

Researcher, Department of Deep Processing of Starch-Containing Raw Materials

Anastasia Alekseevna Morozova, All-Russian Research Institute of Starch and Starch-containing Raw Materials Processing – Branch of Russian Potato Research Centre

Junior Researcher, Department of Deep Processing of Starch-Containing Raw Materials

Luybov Aleksandrovna Wasserman, Emanuel Institute of Biochemical Physics of the Russian Academy of Sciences

PhD in Chemistry, Senior Researcher, Laboratory of Physical and Chemical Modification of Polymers

References

Li Y., Zhao L., Shi L., Lin L., Cao Q., Wei C. Molecules, 2022, vol. 27 (6), 1905. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27061905.

Laveriano-Santos E.P., López-Yerena A., Jaime-Rodríguez C., González-Coria J., Lamuela-Raventós R.M., Vallverdú-Queralt A., Romanyà J., Pérez M. Antioxidants, 2022, vol. 11 (9), 1648. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox11091648.

Amoanimaa-Dede H., Su C., Yeboah A., Chen C., Yang S., Zhu H., Chen M. Phyton-International Journal of Exper-imental Botany, 2020, vol. 89(4), pp. 805–833. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2020.011979.

Hayati M., Zakaria S., Efendi E., Anhar A. IOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, vol. 425 (1), 012055. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/425/1/012055.

Triasih D., Utami F.D. The 3-rd International Conference on Agricultural and Life Sciences. E3S Web of Conferences, 2020, vol. 142 (4), 01007. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202014201007.

Guo K., Liu T., Xu A., Zhang L., Bian X., Wei C. Food Hydrocolloids, 2019, vol. 89, pp. 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.11.058.

Rahman М.S.M., Wheatley C., Rakshit S.K. International Journal of Food Properties, 2003, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 419–430. https://doi.org/10.1081/JFP-120021333.

Ghoshal G., Kaur M. Food Chemistry Advances, 2023, vol. 3 (11), 100356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.focha.2023.100356.

Oke М.O., Workneh T.S. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2013, vol. 8(40), pp. 4990–5003. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2013.6841.

Diofanor Acevedo Correa D.A., Castillo P.M.M., Martelo R.J. Contemporary Engineering Sciences, 2018, vol. 11 (37), pp. 1845–1851. https://doi.org/10.12988/ces.2018.84167.

Fontes B.L.C., Oliveira F.G., Collares-Queiroz F.P. American Journal of Food Technology, 2011, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 348–361. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajft.2011.348.361.

Tsugkiyev B.G., Gagiyeva L.Ch., Dzantiyeva L.B. Pishchevaya promyshlennost', 2017, no. 9, pp. 26–27. (in Russ.).

Akoetey W., Britain M.M., Morawicki R.O. Ciеncia Rural, 2017, vol. 47. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20160610.

Krochmal-Marczak B., Sawicka B., Supski J., Cebulak T., Paradowska K. International Journal of Agricultural Re-search, 2014, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 169–178.

Nunes Jas.G.d.S., Leonel M., Fernandes A.M., Nunes Jes.G.d.S., Figueiredo R.T.d., Silva J.A.d., Menegucci N.C. Ciencia Rural, 2025, vol. 55. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20240046.

Cordeiro C.F., Fabio F.R., Batista G.D., Fernandes A.M. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Fgricola e Ambiental, 2023, vol. 27, no.6, pp. 487–495. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v27n6p487-495.

Oguezi V.U., Ibekwe F.C., Ngbede E.O. Journal of Chemical Society of Nigeria, 2022, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 171–178. https://doi.org/10.46602/jcsn.v47i1.711.

Sanoussi A.F., Adjatin A., Dansi A., Adebowale A., Sanni L.O., Sanni A. International Journal of Current Microbi-ology and Applied Sciences, 2016, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 103–115. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2016.501.009.

Kalashnikova Ye.A., Kirakosyan R.N., Sumin A.V., Abubakarov Kh.G., Temirbekova S.K. Biosfera, 2022, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 331–332. https://doi.org/10.24855/biosfera.v14i4.696. (in Russ.).

Lukin N.D., Kiryukhina I.I., Kostenko V.G. Obshchiye metody analiza v tekhnologicheskom kontrole proizvodst-va krakhmala i krakhmaloproduktov. [General methods of analysis in technological control of production of starch and starch products]. Moscow, 2007, 158 p. (in Russ.).

Barnett R.N. et al. Amer. J. Clin. Path., 1973, vol. 59, pp. 836–845.

Jaiswal A. Potato, Nutrition and Food Security, 2020, pp. 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7662-1_14.

Kaur M., Sandhu K.S. Tropical Roots and Tubers, 2020, pр. 479–506. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118992739.ch11a.

GOST ISO 6647-1-2015. Ris. Opredeleniye soderzhaniya amilozy. Chast' 1. Kontrol'nyy metod. [Rice. Determination of amylose content. Part 1. Reference method]. Moscow, 2019, 16 p. (in Russ.).

Semenova A.V., Gol'dshteyn V.G., Degtyarev V.A., Morozova A.A., Koroleva A.K. Agrarnaya nauka Yevro-Severo-Vostoka, 2022, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 841–851. https://doi.org/10.30766/2072-9081.2022.23.6.841-851. (in Russ.).

Hammett H.L., Constantin R.J., Jones L.G., Hernandez T.P. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 1982, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 119–122. https://doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.107.1.119.

Published
2026-03-08
How to Cite
1. Goldstein V. G., Semenova A. V., Morozova A. A., Wasserman L. A. THE STUDY OF SWEET POTATO (IPOMOEA BATATAS (L.) LAM.) AND ITS PROCESSED PRODUCTS INTO STARCH // Chemistry of plant raw material, 2026. № 1. P. Online First. URL: https://journal.asu.ru/cw/article/view/17074.
Section
Technology